Configuration :: Improving Performance Of Page In IIS?
Jun 14, 2010
In my webpage, the page uses lots of images and css. The time taken to load the initial home page is huge.What are the ways,which can be done in IIS 6.0 to improve the performance?I checked few results in google, which talked about File expiration policy and enabling http compression in IIS 6.0. In the Enable content expiration, what value should be ideally used?In the Custom Http header, what should be added to improve the performance.
I have a pretty big web site (asp.net web) and I have used JavaScript intensively (jquery,custom javascipt, etc) and also The theme and CSS. Right now I have a huge amount of js and css files in my system and I am thinking about minifying and smashing the js and css to improve the performance. So, please advice me the suitable tools and technologies to be used and please suggest me the best practices to be applied in these scenario.
I am working on a small project that requires gridview paging for upto 100k records. what are the ways i can improve the performance. I tried to page using sql server with Temp table but it still is a bit on the slower side.
We are using MSChart on an ASP.net 3.5 web application and noticing significant slowness from enabling tooltips. the performance of drawing a chart is increased by 1,000-2,000ms.The chart output is PNG, and contains in total 108 data points.
I have developed a gridview which has 7,000 records with some filtering. However, theuser is compaining that it is too slow. It seems to me that if the records were stored in memory it would be much faster. This is caching, I think. Is that the case? Can you updaterecords this way? Can you cache with an Access database or do you have to use SQL Server? Can you think of any other ways to improve
I have developed a website in asp.net framework 2 . This website is being hosted in two different servers without any change in code. My issue is about the performance of these 2 sites. One website is taking much time for inserting datas to the DB (SQL server 2005). 2 websites are having different DB server.
I think the issue is for the DB server. How can we rectify the DB performance while insertion and Is there any other cause for this permance issue?
I needed to test the performance of my site on a remote server (do not have IIS access). I am also using Visula Web Developer / Studio Professional 2008 (But not team system version).
I am creating a service oriented application where trying to have everything using services....however there is something I am not sure of , I am having a page that calls the database at the page load...so what would be better and faster?? to call database in pageload , or to call wcf service from javascript during javascript load ??btw , I am using a repeater in the page , but I have created somekind of an engine to create the suitable html so...I'll be creating the repeaters html using the wcf and resend it back to the page If I am using a wcf service at the start.
I should store application configuration data and default text values that will have the best performance overall. For example, I've been sticking stuff like default URL values and the default text for error messages or application instructions inside the web.config, but now I'm wondering if that will scale...
I just had to moved a site of mine from a hosting service here in the states to an offshore host located in Malaysia. My database is still located on the east coast of north america and I am wondering if the distance between the database and the file system might be to blame for slow load times or if moving my database as well would be a waste of time.
Would adding "X-UA-Compatible: IE=EmulateIE7" as an http header to trigger IE9 to render in compatibility mode negatively affect performance on the server? I made the change today, adding it, but now some areas of our site are behaving sluggishly, though we did have a large number of changes come in overnight. I know that we can't single out this as the problem, but my boss seems to think it is.
Please can any body provide me suggestions for standards that you feel are necessary or are areas where effciency/maintenance would improve through standardization.Like GUI,Controller,Repository.Any ideas reagrding ViewModels can be specified under the Controller section? if we place any good results?
I'm doing a timesheet program. In this timesheet program, I have a default button. If a person doing a same task everyday, they can just fill out the task description & click on default button, it will add that task for 5 days.my question is that my button click has to hit database 7 times. Is there anyway that I can improve this?
This is a continuation on this question:The problem is simple. I need to call methods from a REST web service which controls several tables. One table is a snapshot table which contains records with huge XML files. Each XML file is basically a backup from another database. This backup XML is then sent to customers who use the data as read-only information in another product. Basically, the data in the XML are lists of companies, products, business rules and whatever more. And no, those customers work offline most of the time, so they cannot get the data live.Walking through the list of snapshots is tricky: XMLData.Snapshots.Skip(N).Take(1).First(); but it works very nice. It's the answer of the previous Q.But there are three other lists of data that I need to walk through. These are called Changes, Errors and Messages. They contain (1) changes to the data, (2) errors that occurred during modifying the data and (3) generic messages. All of these records are linked to a snapshot record. Thus a single snapshot can contain multiple changes, errors and messages.
I still cannot access the server code but since there's a REST service wrapped around an entity framework exposing most of the functionality, I can still use that service. (And that service is only accessible internally, on the Intranet. This is basically what I have to work with. And while the lists of changes, errors and messages are relatively small, the snapshots are still huge.
The problem is that I now want to generate a client-side report of the changes, errors and messages, but without grouping them by snapshot! They need to be grouped by date. But each record also needs to show the title of the snapshot, which causes me some incredible headaches...When walking through e.g. the Changes with the regular foreach instruction I can load the Snapshot data by using XMLData.LoadProperty(Change, "Snapshots"); but since the snapshot record itself is generally about 300 MB, this just slows the whole thing down to a crawl. (There are tens of thousands of these records in total!) So I need a faster solution, without having to modify the server code. Yeah, okay. Modifying the server would be the proper way but that's not possible. It's in production and this list isn't important enough to require an upgrade of the server. Basically, I'm not allowed to modify any server-code for now. (But they still want this list.)The application I'm working on is something that just needs to run once per week or per month. But with the current amount of records, I estimate it would take more than two days to finish. The data itself will be updated a few times every office day and snapshots are created every week or so on the server. Errors can always be generated when users start browsing the site which maintains the data but in general, there will be about 50 changes and 4 errors per week, plus a few messages when the server goes down and up again or when snapshots are generated.
I am not sure if this is the right forum. I can not find a forum for LINQ.
I am working on an application using LINQ. Application performance is not up to par and my tests show that it is LINQ queries that are slow. I was wondering if anybody can recommend where I can find an article about optimizing LINQ performance maybe by compilation or other methods.
I have a query that hit my mind when I was adding an asp.net web page in a project. Normally we place the server side code in the codebehind file. Could there be any improvement in the server side processing if we place both the code and the page design markup in the same page? I am referring to the practice like this:
[code]....
If we use separate codebehind file, we would do all these in the page load event and make div elements visible, invisible according to the test. We could even have only one div in the design page and set its inner text accordingly.
We have one page which is about 300 KB after compression of viewstate. It's loading very slow. We are using telerik tabstrip. There are 8 user controls being loaded for this tab. Is there anyway we can improve the performance of this page?
Every now and then (always after a long period of idle-time, e.g. overnight) when I access a site built using asp.net - it takes around 15 seconds to load the page (15 seconds before I see any progress whatsoever, then the page comes up fast).Further pages on that site, or refreshes, are quick as usual - they are also fast on other machines, only the first one seems to take the 'hit'.
Page tracing never through anything up (whole cycle was a fraction of a second) So my question is where else should I be looking? Perhaps IIS? Or could it still be my asp.net app and I'm just looking in the wrong place (the trace) for clues?As I don't have much control over the IIS server, anything I can check through asp.net would be more helpful, before I go ask that particular admin.
I have to test my asp.net web application for performance when there are simultaneous requests for the web site in my developer machine before deploy in production. How can I achieve this using Visual Studio?.(without using third party tools preferably Visual studio 2010 professional edition
I have a relatively simple page that will do most of its operations on the client side using Javascript or JQuery. However, initially I do need to retrieve some data from the DB server based on QueryString parameters.
I plan on passing this data in the form of a JSON string to the script by an old-fashioned ASP manner ( var severData = <%=MyPublicData %>) block where MyPublicData is defined in CodeBehind as:
Public string MyPublicData;
The question is, which event in the ASP.NET page lifecycle is the best for this? Page_Init ? Page_Load? Also, is it worth the effort to do this in ASP.NET MVC. I did look at this possiblity but it seemed a little too much for a simple page like this where I do more 90% of the work on the client.
I am having trouble with the performance of a web site... Some SQL queries are killing the server. But, as the title of this post mention, I looked at the OutputCache page directive to improve performance of the site. Although, I came across some questions regarding this directive:
1- If I have a web-user control that declares an OuputCache directive in a page that has one too, which one will "win"?
2- What's the best pratice regarding the duration ? I'd love to have a sliding window too.
