Web Forms :: How To Fix Url Routing Different From The Basics That Is Builtin In The Framework
Feb 1, 2011
I need to fix url routing different from the basics that is builtin in the framework...Basically I need it to go unlimited levels deep the same as the product catalog can when using the parent relation for each category added. does anyone have a good sample for webforms of how I could do it...I want URL listings to look like this[URL] and details URL looking like this[URL]
I've been trying to setup the routing table for the urls on one of the website I'm moving across to the MVC framework.We are aiming to setup urls like:
www.site.com/sports/cycling - which is the topical page for cycling and listing all the cycling events
www.site.com/sports/cycling/road-race - which is details about the "road-race" cycling event.We have setup the following routes in global.asax:
routes.MapRoute(
"SportEvent", // Route name
"sports/{sport}/{sportevent}", // URL with parameters
[code]...
We have tried this and also run it through the Route Tester and only the second route table is pick matching.The first url (www.site.com/sports/cycling) is being matched correctly, but the second url (www.site.com/sports/cycling/road-race) does not match up correctly and doesn't match the sports event action.Have I missed an item that is required in the route table for this to work?Or is there changes that I need to make to the route table in global.asax to get this to match and work correctly?
I've been dynamically asigning master pages using code for a number of years as part of a skinning engine. Today however,I'm needing to do a 'simple' ASP.Net site that just uses the out of the box basics.I'm hitting a hurdle though and can't figure why.
[code]... Now - I want to add an <asp:placeholder> control inside the child page's <Content1> tags - however,the designer's intellisense doesn't show them. If I delete the MasterPageFile tag from the top of the child's page, then all of a sudden it works.Why can't I add a placeholder inside a child form?
What is the use of declaring the static class. I know that we cant create the object for the static class but i want to know that is the use of creating the class as static.
I've been handed some documentation about an API and been told to integrate it (the API uses SOAP). I'm familiar with web services and how they work, but I've never built a functional one. That is to say, I can create a basic web method in C# but I've never written anything to connect to an external system. I've read parts of books and I've not been able to find a good example about how to connect to and use a third-party API. I guess my question would be "how can I use this API with our systems?"
I'm trying to implement a small server/client web service to understand the fundamentals of WCF. I've created both the client and the server and so far have them communicating with each other through a very simple getter method. I've added in a database to the server and have a LINQ to SQL connection (I'm not sure if that's the proper terminology).
What I would like to know is, where can I learn the fundamentals now, for example: returning the number of rows into the client console window and using the basic CRUD functions from the client to update the database? I don't want to go to deep to soon, as I would like a bit of a foundation to work off before it starts to get really complex.
ASP.NET 3.5 SP1 with Web Forms Routing thru Global.asax (System.Web.Routing and RegisterRoutes)IIS 7
Everything is working fine in my local machine, but it gives the following error in my hosting environment:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Routing, Version=3.5.0.0, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I did everything inside my web.config file mentioned in the following link:
My task for today is to fully understand event-driven programming and how it works. Now there are several ways this can be achieved. The first one is to actually program a basic program that covers the key concepts, and the second approach is to watch a video that explains the key concepts in a way I can understand. Which approach do people recommend?
Does anyone have videos/program demos they found useful and could recommend to me? My major experiences are with ASP.NET MVC, so it would be best if the tutorial were with WebForms ASP.NET.
I have a Web application where i have added a reference to a RESTful WCF. I got the WCF url Routing to work in my webapplication by adding Inherits="RestService.Global" to the Web applications Global.asax.
But then i tried to create url Routing for the Web application and it does not work with the Inherits="RestService.Global" in the Global.asax. If i take it away it works fine. Is there a correct way to do this.
I'm trying to create my own CMS and I've gotten a little bit stuck at the stage of URL routing.
I want clean URLs without extensions and I'd like to be able to create and modify them in a web based interface without any messing around with IIS or actual files.
I've seen how to create a static route, but for that I need to go into my Global.asax file and manually add it.I would like to have all of these routes stored in a database so that I can easily modify them later.
Does anyone know how this can be achieved?
Just for extra information, I will be attempting to create a feature so that if a path exists, but is later changed, a 301 redirect is created to the new URL, is this also possible? (My first problem is the main issue, but thought I might ask this as well just in case it makes a difference)
How to handle asp.net mvc routing along with asp.net webform routing. I have merged my mvc app into my existing web application. In my web application i have implement routing as below:
routes.Add("View Product Details", new Route("Product/{City}/{Manufacturer}/{Name}/{ProductID}/{*ProductType}"));
Similarly i have implemented routing in mvc as below
I host a website that has recently been upgraded from .NET Framework 2.0 to .NET Framework 4.0. Within the website, I have an instance of BlogEngine which still requires .NET Framework 2.0. Each website is in it's own application pool. My issue is that when I browse to the blog portion of my website, I receive a 500.19 error with the following information...
The configuration section 'system.web.extensions' cannot be read because it is missing a section declaration The web.conf file that is listed in the error message is the config file that belongs to my root website which is running .NET Framework 4.0. How do I get the two websites to run together in the same website using different versions of the .NET Framework?
I have this cenario:One server (machine) that have framework 3.5. And one site (website) developed for framework 3.5.This site can not be modified (rebuild in other FW version, or others changes).
I'll developer a new webapplication (WAP) in framework 4.0 (using microsoft visual web developer 2010).
As I know, the new webaplication work in the server, if I install framework 4.0 in the server.
My question is: Can I install the framework 4.0 on the machine that already have framework 3.5. And continue have sites working with other frameworks version?Or, should I develop my new webapplication in framawork 3.5 ?If I can install the framework 4.0, do I need make some specify configuration during the installation?
We are developping with .net framework 2.0 on our dev station and we deploy on web server and client desktop a 3 tiers smart client app. what is the impact of ugrading to .net framework 2.0 sp2 on our web servers WITHOUT upgrading on dev station and compilation servers?
I am trying to implement Url routing in 4.0 by following example [URL]
Works fine..
Now the scenario is that i have gridview with object datasource which accepts "Name" as query string.
[Code]....
i tried this code. But i couldn't get the value in QueryString Field?? How to handle in this situation?? + How to implement (the link example in net 3.5)? because i don't "
[Code]....
" attribute in 3.5. i have few existing application in 3.5 so thought of implementing there too.
I have an old Web application which is using net framework 2.0(build with vs2005), now i need to move the old Web application to production server which has .net framwork 3.5 installed. Do I need recompile the web application with vs2008 or i can just go head move the the Web application without recompiling, it will automatically work?