I have an asp.net website for a car dealership. I wanted to create an admin site where personel from the dealership can add and delete cars to the site. how do I get started? what shall I read up on? I've read some of the security knowledge to add login and user accounts and what not, but now I am after setting up the website to allow this. do I need a sub domain to allow this? is that the only way? the web hosting company I am using (discountasp.net) will make me pay more $5 a month to use sub domain
I'm working on a SharePoint portal site, while user should be redirected to it from SAP Portal, both of the two portal, user is going to be authenticated through Active Directory.So is there a way to have a single sign on for both of them, so user login to SAP portal and then be redirected to sharepoint portal without providing his login credentials again?
I want to put my website project and admin website under same project as I want to use session and authentication of the main site. Also I want to show the admin, the page, where he has made changes. But the problem is whenever I will change anything in admin pages, I've to build the entire website. I don't want to do that. Can I build that separately?
I don't want to choose the option of building all pages separately as well.
Is there any alternatives of doing that. Separate projects for admin and website will come up with many other challenges. So I would like to avoid that.
We have an SAP portal, which is not user friendly from clients point of view, we as ASP.NET developers suggest to use ASP.NET as a presentation layer for SAP backend system instead of SAP portal.We already integrated successfully to SAP backend for data insert and retrieval.So, we need to show ASP.NET power to SAP Team! How an ASP.NET portal will be much better than SAP portal.We though of AJAX functionality, look & feel of UI, and application mobility (cross browser).
So, what are the pros and cons of an ASP.NET portal compared to SAP portal? What are the issues SAP portal has, ASP.NET doesn't?Briefly, how to convince decision makers of ASP.NET over SAP from UI/Performance points of view?
How do you create your web site data admin for your customers. Do you do them programatically or do you use any specific tool?
I have been using AspMaker and is not a bad option but I'm sure there are a few more options out there. I've seen that MS has a Web Data Administrator but for me it looks more than an sql server web admin tool rather than a frontend that has the business logic.
I am planning to develop around 4 product catalogue websites. The functionality of all the websites would be same. however the design, images and css would be different.
All the 4 websites will use the same admin panel, forums and database(MS Access) also.
How should I create such a system.
I dont understand what kind of folder structure should I create.
I would like to create following kind of folder structure.
I am currently designing an ASP.Net web site where does not required any user login on the page. However, I do need to put an Admin page up along with this web page for my client use to manage the content on the page (e.g.: Change Pictures, Updating News). For security reason, I do not want to include a separate page sit reside in the site, so nobody can even try access to the page [URL]
I have a secure admin section in my website, only logged in users can gain access to this section, its controlled from the web.config file like this
[Code]....
This has all works perfectly well until now. Ive created a page that has an accordian control on it from the ajax control toolkit, as soon as I place this control on a page and run the web page, I get this error
i wanted to give an email option to the admin of a website where he can enter multiple email id's and a costamized text etc , and the sending message must be stored with the details of the timings and date and to whom in send.
I am currently developing a website for a friend of mine who is a dj. I have a login page, which works fine however i want to inplement a menu that only users with the Administrator role can view. I have done alot of research and i have found ways to stop a user from visiting a page, when they click on it it takes the to the login page. But i want to completely hide the menu from Non Admins.
I have a simple online store where there are products that can be put into a cart and purchased. There is a admin page that can be logged into so that new products can be added or existing products can be removed or edited. To get to the admin area I need to put a /admin/index after the main page loads up. If I want to give my friends (from any location) the ability to add new products should I create a link to the admin area on the main page (like at the bottom) of the main page or should I just tell them to type in /admin/index after they go to the webpage?
i have designed a website in that i have image tool but the image must change dynamically the changes is made in admin page.. by which tool we cn obtain that......
I have an Admin folder which contains 4-5 aspx pages. I want to that only user with role="admin" can view those files. What settings i need in web.config?
I've a Gmail account, assume that me@gmail.com. Now I want to login (as admin) in my website through this account. I know I can use OpenID etc. for that purpose but I want to limit it for just me only. Can I do this? I don't let anyone else to know which service I used to login and what is my address and etc. (Note: My website contains just one and only one login form, for just me, only!)
I can't get past the "Test" link on the "Provider" tab in my Web Site Admin Tool (WSAT).
I'm running SQL Express (10.0.2531.0) and have created my "ASPNETDB" database using the version of aspnet_regsql that came with .Net 2.0. (When that work, I re-ran the version that came with 4.0.)
I have the following in my web.config:
[Code]....
And this:
[Code]....
When I go into the WSAT, to the Provider tab, I select "AspNetSqlProvider" and click test.
The error message I get is this:
Could not establish a connection to the database.
If you have not yet created the SQL Server database, exit the Web Site Administration tool, use the aspnet_regsql command-line utility to create and configure the database, and then return to this tool to set the provider.
I found a great answer on SO describing how to set up custom user roles, and I've done the same in my project. So in my Login service I have:
public ActionResult Login() { // password authentication stuff omitted here var roles = GetRoles(user.Type); // returns a string e.g. "admin,user" var authTicket = new FormsAuthenticationTicket( 1, userName, DateTime.Now, DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(20), // expiry false, roles, "/"); var cookie = new HttpCookie(FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName, FormsAuthentication.Encrypt(authTicket)); Response.Cookies.Add(cookie); return new XmlResult(xmlDoc); // don't worry so much about this - returns XML as ActionResult } And in Global.asax.cs, I have (copied verbatim from the other answer): protected void Application_AuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) { var authCookie = Context.Request.Cookies[FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName]; if (authCookie != null) { var authTicket = FormsAuthentication.Decrypt(authCookie.Value); var roles = authTicket.UserData.Split(new Char[] { ',' }); var userPrincipal = new GenericPrincipal(new GenericIdentity(authTicket.Name), roles); Context.User = userPrincipal; } } Then, in my ServicesController class, I have: [Authorize(Roles = "admin")] //[Authorize] public ActionResult DoAdminStuff() { ... }
I login as a user with the "admin" role, and that works. Then I call /services/doadminstuff - and I get access denied, even though when I put a breakpoint in Global.asax.cs, I can see that my roles do include "admin". If I comment out the first Authorize attribute (with roles) and just use a plain vanilla Authorize, then I can access the service.
I created a web application using visual studio 2010 (.NET framework 4.0). I am trying to add this website in IIS on a remote server. The remote server only has .NET Framework 2.0. I am getting an error:
Could not load file or assembly 'projectname' or one of its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded.
Is there any workaround for this, without added .net framework 4.0?
my requirement is i want to upload word documents and pdf documents into my website with security (i mean encryption) and i want to retrieve documents by giving password the document should visible(or the document should visible for only some people how to do it)
I have a website deeloped in ASP.NET and I want it to be accessed via local URL, for eg: http://localhost/website20I tried once but the CMS in my website started giving error "It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS."
I have many different websites under the same directory on my server. I want to know if there is a way I can register a dll for many websites once. That way, I won't have to go to each website and do reference -> add reference , etc.
We have a web site that sits on a DotNetNuke platform and all of our coded modules are written in VB.Net for consistency. However, we have been sent a web page that works as a link and it is written in C# and references a cs file in its App_Code folder. If we try and load this into our website we get an error saying that it is not written in VB we then tried converting the homepage to VB but the reference folder is very complex and written in C#. Can we load the reference file even though it is C# and reference it using VB code. The current all is OurRemService RemService = New OurRemService(); where OurRemService is a file in the App_Code folder in the web page folder. The only other way around this is for us to set it up in IIS as a virtual directory and reference it directly but we would prefer to integrate it into our website.
When I add a second website to my solution, it is putting it on a different port. My first website is running on port 50483, and my new website is running on port 55760. I was a little surprised, because I don't see the need to run them on different ports since they are seperate virtual directories.
