I'm using a static Timer in my Global.asax to run a method at regular intervals. When the method throws an exception, my application is stopped. I have used an empty catch to prevent exceptions from stopping the application something like below code. Is there a disadvantage to use such an approach?
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
I even created a global.asax file and on the Application_Error event, I wrote a code that would email me the error (and i'm not getting an email regarding that error when I get the error shown above). I know for a fact that the thread is going inside the "try" statement because I send emails to myself whenever it finishes certain codes inside of it. So how come I'm getting that error in my browser instead of it being handled in my "catch" statement? I have two problems here, one, why is the exception not going to my "catch" statement, and two, why am I getting that error in the first place.
If I am just logging exception details in my web app, do I really need to put in exception handling logic for each tier? Why not just let them all bubble up the stack trace to the global.asax and log them there?
I'm trying to use the Global.asax file in the root application of the website to catch requests for pdf files in the root that don't exist any more. I've configured iis to send pdf requests to asp.net. The whole thing works perfectly on development. It also works on the live system with missing .aspx pages, but not .pdf. Instead an "Error Code 64: Host not available". I'm using the Global.asax file to avoid the web.config and child applications (1.1 & 2.0) inheriting settings.
Edit:
I configured IIS to send .pdf requests to asp.net using the Application Configuration dialog on the mappings tab and adding .pdf extension mapped to the aspnet_isapi.dll. "Verify that file exists" is turned off (although I've also tried it turned on).
So I handle all exceptions in my project within my Global.asax page. For example, on a random page I could have:
[code]....
So my question is in the Application_Error method, do I need the try/catch block when trying to write to the database? I'm thinking I would in case something goes wrong with the connection, etc. - but is this really necessary? Also, what would I do in the catch block if there is an error? At that point I would be catching the error of logging an error which is confusing in its own right.
Looking for best practice focused answers here with explanations.
Should the presentation layer of an ASP.Net app catch and handle exceptions thrown from the business layer, or should these be allowed to bubble out, where they can all be logged and handled uniformly in the Global.ascx's Application_Error handler?
i am almost finished up with a website and i have used this try catch block only in few places. now what i want is that i want to catch all the exception so that i can report the same through mail.. is it possible in any way to catch all the exception in one place and mail it cause now writing this block everywhere will be a kind of tedious process?
I have tried this on two different controller methods now, and both times, even if the linq2sql doesn't allow the data to be saved, the code never jumps into the catch block.
I've watched the noun object in the middle of the trace, and the isvalid property is false, but the modelstate isvalid is true. Either way, the code never jumps into the catch block.I'm pulling my hair out about this. I feel like it will be something really silly.
The code all works similar to nerd dinner.
NounRepository nounRepository = new NounRepository(); Noun noun = new Noun(); try[code]...
I'd rather not have to add code in this manner though, as it seems like an unnecessary duplication.
In Asp.net (c#),i'm not able to catch exception(FileNotFoundException) properly... i don't know the reason..Actually File s not there..But catch statement fails to catch the exception..here is the code..
public static List<Customer> GetCustomers(int maximumRows, int startRowIndex) { try { ... some select to database here... } catch (Exception ex) { Utils.LogError(ex); throw ex; } }
Now let's imagine that GetCustomers for some reason throws an exception. How could i catch this exception and handle it? I know i can use Application_Error, but i would like to catch this exception somehow on my page and show some friendly message to the user.
A developer has created a custom control in ASP.NET using VB.NET. The custom control uses a repeater. In certain scenarios, the rpt_ItemDataBound event is encountering a data error. My goal is rather than having the user see the yellow screen of death, give the user a friendlier error explaining exactly what the data error is. I figured I would be able to use a Try/Catch block as shown below throw the exception, however, it appears that the event has nowhere to be thrown to and stops executing at the "End Try" line.
Protected Sub rpt_ItemDataBound(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeaterItemEventArgs) Handles rpt1.ItemDataBound, rpt2.ItemDataBound Try ProcessBadData... Catch ex As Exception Throw ex End Try End Sub
In VB.NET, I can find where the repeater's DataSource is being set, however, I can not find a DataBind event. how I can capture the exception in this ASCX control so I can report it to the user? Edit: The stack trace looks like this. There is another repeater within the repeater that is actually causing the error (rptOther) and I'm able to catch the error, but I can only throw it to the rpt_ItemDataBound. I can't figure out how rpt_ItemDataBound is getting called without a DataBind event.
at Company.WebForms.Control.rptOther_ItemDataBound(Object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.OnItemDataBound(RepeaterItemEventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.CreateItem(Int32 itemIndex, ListItemType itemType, Boolean dataBind, Object dataItem) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.CreateControlHierarchy(Boolean useDataSource) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.OnDataBinding(EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.DataBind() at Company.WebForms.Control.rpt_ItemDataBound(Object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
I need to create a small web application. The first thing I need to do is to develop the login, logout and user session management functionality. I wanted to use a masterpage and a usercontrol for this purpose. When a user open the page and IS LOGGED IN, the usercontrol should something like this: "Hello Username! <a>Logout</a>" And if he is NOT LOGGED IN, the Usercontrol should show something like this "Login | Logout"
When he clicks on the Login Button the Login-page should be opened. How can I build a Usercontrol which does the above thing. (I have never build a usercontrol and used it in a masterpage before!) The second problem is a little bit komplexer: What happens if the user idles some times and after that time (for example 30minutes) comes back to his pc and wants to execute an action in the web application. Normally he should get an session timeout asp.net exception. I don't want that the user sees this asp.net errorpage, I want to redirect him to the Login Page and he should relogin and gets an error message shown something like "You were timed out. Please login again".
Does [HandleError] attribute in MVC replaces the traditional try catch exception handling?
As I have seen codes in controllers where the top line of code is [HandleError] also I have not seen much of try catch in the code of the application I am working on.
while doing debugging i found a blue dotted corner around catch block, while hovering it is showing system.exception...what does it mean and what to do
i have the following code in my global.ascx and when i click a generate error button the code gets run but seems to fail on the insert error into the DB.
I want the error to be saved to the DB and redirect to default.aspx.
pretty standard stuff.
the error i get is: exe.Message = "Incorrect syntax near 'System'." (looks like somethign with the SQL objects used in global.asx)
void Application_Error(object sender, EventArgs e) { // Code that runs when an unhandled error occurs Exception ex = Server.GetLastError(); StringBuilder theBody = new StringBuilder(); theBody.Append("Error Message: " + ex.ToString() + "
i have a datagrid control which displays users created using sqlMembership..it has a row deleting event which is only accessed by administrators here is the code..
[Code]....
my problem here is to catch the securityexception and display in label
regarding one issue I am facing. I created a httpmodule for hadling the unhandled errors and I need to log those errors using log 4 net in database.Everting working fine but I am not getting any error information once the error was hadled and I need that info too. I want to make it as a centralize module which can trap all errors and log those errors.How call application_error event of httpmodule from catch block...so that I can log that info there and I no need log in every catch block..
I got this security warning ReviewVisibleEventHandlers(CA2109)for all event handler methods that are present in Global.asax.cs file(Application_Start,Session_Start,Application_BeginRequest,Application_EndRequest,Application_AuthenticateRequest,Application_Error,Session_End,Application_End.
I am trying to fix this warning by marking all event handler methods that are present in Global.asax.cs file as private. Does it result in any side effects in web application execution?
I have (pretty much) the following code in my protected void Application_Error(object sender, EventArgs e) method in Global.asax....
Exception ex = Server.GetLastError();
if (ex is System.Security.SecurityException)
Response.Redirect("Logon.aspx");
else
Response.Redirect("ErrorPage.aspx");
If I navigate to a page before I log on the exception is caught and I am redirected to Login.aspx as I would expect. However, this is only working when debugging using VS on my local machine.When uploaded to the live environment, the exception is not caught and the user is presented with "Security Exception - Request for principal permission failed."
I m having a datagrid and for client side events I m using Javascript. I have few other buttons in the same page.
when I click on datagrid and select, it is working fine. After that, if I click on any other button in the Page, It is directly going to global.asax and throwing exception.
If I click directly on other buttons, they are working fine. Once I click on Datagrid and try to click on other buttons, it is throwing that exception.
Here's my problem I have some code and I'm using it to send an e-mail with the last error details but all I want is the (Inner)Exception Message to be displayed in the email with the URL