Upgrading A Regular .net Project To .net Mvc 3 (RC2) With Razor Syntax?
Dec 22, 2010
I'm upgrading a regular asp.net project to asp.net mvc 3 (RC2) with Razor syntax. I got stuck now trying to figure out some way to create nested master pages. My main "layout" page contains the default header & footer. I used
[Code]....
When I now try to make a view page use the AuthLayout as a "layout" page:
[Code]...
Then I receive this error: The "RenderBody" method has not been called for layout page "~/Views/Shared/_AuthLayout.cshtml".
Is there any tool out there which can upgrade an MVC project from MVC2 to MVC3 and at the same time upgrades to the ViewEngine Razor or must I do this work manually everytime a new MVC version is released?
For reporting we used report RDLCs and displayed using an ASPX form. We implemented using the route as shown below. This resulted in forcing us to use the page route below and also to use the hyperlink instead of the normal Action Link. The question is how do we convert the asp:hyperlink ASPX syntax to Razor syntax.
How does one create a .cshtml page in an ASP.NET web application? The option to choose Razor is obvious when using MVC - it appears when adding a view. But I can't seem to figure out how to accomplish this in a plain ASP.NET Web Application. Is it even possible?
In Windows Forms I can create a class file called 'Authentication.cs' with the following code:
public class Authentication { public string Name; internal bool Authenticate() { bool i = false; if (Name == "Jason") { i = true; } return i; } }
In WebMatrix, I can insert a new Class file, called 'Authentication.cs', and insert the above code. And in my default.cshtml file, I do this:.........................
I download and installed the latest version of MVC3 from this website [URL]. The MVC3 framework works but not the syntax highlighter for Razor or intellisense. Anyone knows how to make this work? Just for your information, I could not install the vs10-kb2483190-x86.exe.
Check out the following: <a href="/test?x=@if (Model.IsTest) { @(1) } else { @(4) }"></a> Is there a better way to write this instead of the @(1) and @(4)?
i created a web setup project for my asp.net application. am trying to create an upgrade MSI that will only replace some few files in my initial installation (very minor upgrade). right now, am not getting it right because the whole initial set of files is been replaced. i guess i only need to change the package code, but i cant do this in VS.NET 2008.
While it has gnerally been advocated to separate code from mark up and all that, with the razor syntax and webmatrix all that is not valid anymore, I think. WebMatrix encourages code and mark up in the same page! So what is the best practice as far as code and mark up is concerned.
It's great that Razor HTML encodes by default. However, many times I have HTML in a database and want to display it literally on a page. In WebForms 4, we can use <%= %> and <%: %> to choose between encoding options. Raven's syntax is currently @(new HtmlString(Model.Greeting)).
add a shorter syntax to Razor. Something like @=Model.Greeting or @@Model.Greeting, or something else.
This question appear when I worked with partial view (MVC3/Razor), but I am sure - it's clear Razor Syntax question, not related direct to partial view. So - I have partial view Menu.cshtml with full markup as:
@model IEnumerable<SportsStore.WebUI.Models.NavLink> @foreach(var link in Model) { @Html.RouteLink(link.Text, link.RouteValues); }
No problem - "parent" view call it @{Html.RenderAction("Menu", "Nav");} and all work as magic. But, if I will edit the Menu.cshtml as:
@model IEnumerable<SportsStore.WebUI.Models.NavLink> @foreach(var link in Model) { Html.RouteLink(link.Text, link.RouteValues); }
(see - NO '@' before Html.RouteLink!) all just broke: now @{Html.RenderAction("Menu", "Nav");} output is totally empty, no one HTML tag. Want to know - what is the difference between two piece of code? I assume @ before foreach also automatically "drop into" and apply to Html.RouteLink as well? So - am I wrong?
I downloaded some project from some site which is made in VS 2003. When I open its project file in Notepad I get following at first line Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 8.00. I don't have VS 2003 in my PC but I have VB 2005 and 2008 Express Edition. Now I wanted to upgrade that file but it is not doing.
I have an application which has been built in MVC 2.0. I need to upgrade it to MVC 3.0 and that too by using Razor CSHTML engine. All the information which I got on the net was for MVC 3.0 Webform engine but nothing much for migrating to Razor.
I have a project who build in MVC 1 and i make a new fresh project to migrate them in MVC 3. so it's work fine. but whenever it's come to done or complete we hear that not make changes in Admin panel.so i copy paste the model [logic module] from MVC 1 to MVC3 and now many of code was not worked. they used dll to use logic. when i try to use them in my project who is new version that's not worked.now i thing to migrate the MVC 1 project to MVC 3 and the taks and changes i do last days i integrated in old one.well tell me the way i can use to migrate the MVC 1 project to MVC 3 razor without making new project. means changes in old and make them work fine in razor.
I have a Visual Studio 2003 web service project that I have to upgrade to Visual Studio 2008. After I have run the conversion wizard, I get this message: You have completed the first step in converting your Visual Studio .NET 2003 web project. To complete the conversion, please select your projectin the Solution Explorer and choose the 'Convert to Web Application'context menu item.I got this message with another project, which was originally a "web site", rather than an ASP.NET "web application". It made sense to in that case (sort of). Why, however, would I not just want to have this project remain a web service project?Additionally, when I follow the instructions and select "Convert to Web Application" from the context menu, I don't get any feedback that anything has changed. Should it have?
