ADO.NET :: Query Execution / Last Suppose 1000 Mails Queued Then 1000 Times Get Mail Queued?
Feb 15, 2011
i am using sql server inbuilt mail system for sending mail.and i made SP to call dbmail sp
now my problem is when i call sp it get executed fine but in last suppose 1000 mails queued then 1000 times i get mail queued.and that my connection time out .i extend connection time out limit but i get error msg like
"Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. Mail queued."
my mail get queued well proper but due to 1000 or 100000 mail queued its lost of msg make problem.
Me with C#.net and sqlserver 2005. In my application there is a need to insert 1000 products details into my sqlserve table. I am using a for loop to insert and its done using a stored procedure, but when this code executes it stops mostly after 80 iterations and showing the error "Object reference not set to an instance of an object". How can I over come this? How can I make a steady sqlconnection?
Let's say we are building some public service that grabs the setup of a user (what server, user and pwd he wants to perform the call), logs in into that server and do some processing...
the process takes about 15 seconds to complete each user has a different setup (server/user/pwd), so the process needs to run against each one
if 1000 users tells the system to run the method at 1:00PM
How can I insure that the method is processed in the next 15 minutes?
What should be the correct approach to this little problem?
I'm thinking that I need to do something Asynchronously, and parallel processing could speed up things, maybe throttling the processes, maybe execute 100 calls per each 30 seconds?
I never did something like this and would love to get your feedback on ideas and future problems just to spend 100 hours of work and realize that I took a wrong road
I have a data grid in which I have to display around 12,000 records. Even if I do paging it is difficult to display all the records. Is there any other control or something else so that I can display all these records. Even if I make these as alphabetical also, some times I have to load 1000 records in a page which is difficult.
If a user makes a second request to the same Web Service method while the first request is already running, is there a way to simply stop the execution of the first request and discard it immediately?
Usually what happens is users get impatient and click on a button 10 times when there's a performance blip in the system, which only makes things worse since the system now has to process 10 queued requests (the first 9 of which are now irrelevant) before any results are returned.
I am using Linq to SQL. I have a table with a uniqueidentifyer column.
I need to insert 1000 records, each with all the same values except for the uniqueid field.
I know the syntax to insert a single record for example where dc is a DataContext():
[Code]....
Does anyone know how if there is a way, other than looping 1000 times, to tell SQL to insert 1000 records generating different unique ids but assign the constant values to the other columns?
Let's say I am creating a image hosting website. My potential users will be somewhere around 1 Million, and every user potential has 10,000 images, and I need to serve over 1000 images per second.
So, I bought a diskarray, with 10T storage, SAS 15K SCSI drives.
The problem is: What is the best way to save those files on disk? How to organize the folder structure to make sure NTFS can find one file from a billion files under a huge tree folder quickly? I mean, serve 1000 images per second is non trivial issue. My current website is serving over 100 images per second, and I already see the performance problem: NTFS can't find the file fast enough! And of course, my folder structure is not good enough either.
I have a datagrid control which is bound to a table which containing more than 1000 records. And i want to show only 25 records once a time. I have used paging in datagrid. But each time the next page index is set, query is fired again. This takes lots of time. So what is the easiest way to bound data in this case to improve performance.
I'm using an online form at one of my web sites.Every mail sent from this form is coming in one mail even if the senders IP is different.But I want every single mail to be unique even if the content is same.What I need to do to the mails or which header I need to modify?
SmtpClient smtpClient = new SmtpClient(); MailMessage message = new MailMessage();
MailAddress fromAddress = new MailAddress("no-reply@toprakbasim.com", "NoReply");
The following question seems to be haunting me more consistently than most other questions recently. What kinds of things they look for when trying to debug "performance issues" like this?k, get this - running this in query analyzer takes < 1 second
I have this code up in a live windows 2003 sp2 server. I use Hmailserver as mail server and I am not sure if this cause the problem.I am able to send email consecutively 2 time no problem, but it is always the 3rd time after I would get this error: Unable to read data from the transport connection: net_io_connectionclosed. I wait for 30 minutes I am to send email again, but only the first 2 time works. Here is my code can someone please verify my code and see if anything is wrong with it.
Select a from tbl_abc where id in ( select id from tbl_xyz where mainid = 12)
When I am executing this query, it is taking 1-2 seconds to execute, but when I am using the same query in stored procedure, the below query is taking more than 5 minute:
If(Select a from tbl_abc where id in ( select id from tbl_xyz where mainid = 12)) BEGIN -- CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE [Say: #temp1] #temp1 => Select a from tbl_abc where id in ( select id from tbl_xyz where mainid = 12) inserting the same value in the temp table drop #temp1 END
what could be the reason of this? and how can I resolve this? I am running the SP from asp.net
I need to find out the query execution time from the front end .Where should I insert the code for that.
I am using the bleow query:
OracleConnection con = new OracleConnection(ConnStr); con.Open(); OracleCommand cmd = new OracleCommand("Stored_Proc",con); cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; cmd.Parameters.Add(); .................... ................ OracleDataAdapter oda = new OracleDataAdapter (cmd);
when i am executing a simple query it is takeing 47 sec .... that is only for one table.. other then that remaing table perfromance is good... Help me out... and is there chance to get good perfomance through .net coding..
Can any one please provide link for flow of query exection in sql
For eg. FROM, [JOIN CONDITION, JOIN TABLE ...], WHERE, GROUP BY, HAVING, SELECT, DISTINCT, ORDER BY, TOP
Suppose when we write query, how that query will get execute behind. I would like to know about that. Can you please provide ariticles or link related to this
I'm executing one stored procedure from the '.net' code. Since there is a lot of data, it is taking too much time to execute. Is there any way to stop this execution from the c# code?
In other words, if we execute the query from database itself, there is a option to stop its execution but in the code is it possible?
i am using the transaction-per-request (session-in-view) pattern for an asp.net web application. I have a couple of points in the application where i want to Save an NHibernate managed entity and then do a couple of more inserts and updates using common sql. These inserts/updates depend on the ID that the NH saved entity will take.
The problem is that the generated id does not exist in the transactions' scope. If i force a flush/commit the id is persisted but if the inserts/updates fail i have to rollback but the flushed/committed entity will not. Currently I'm doing a manual insert for these cases but that is something i want to change. So, is there a way to execute the SQL statement (inside the already open transaction) after the Save() but without forcing a flush/commit?
EDIT: I'm adding a semi-pseudocode example, i got 4 wrong answers so i think people don't understand (how NHibernate works) At the Begin request i issue a
nhsession.BeginTransaction()
then at some point i do
FooClass fc = new FooClass("value"); nhsession.Save(fc); ITransaction trans = nhsession.Transaction; SqlCommand sc = new SqlCommand("some insert/update query that depends on fc's id", (SqlConnection)nhsession.Connection); sc.Parameters.Add("id", fc.Id); //NHibernate generates the id, note i'm using assigned/hi-lo so no round trip to the db takes place transaction.Enlist(sc); try { sc.ExecuteNonQuery(); } catch (SqlException ex){ transaction.RollBack(); nhsession.Close(); }
and at the end of the Request i issue a CommitTransaction() and nhsession.Close()
Now this will do absolutely nothing: the FooClass (fc) has not been flushed/commited to the database. The Save() operation that NH has done is up to that point in-memory. That means no sql command has been issued by nhibernate and that means that the SqlCommand (sc) that i fire afterwards will fail miserably as the id does not exist.
If i do a flush/commit between Save() and the SqlCommand the FooClass(fc) _cannot_be_rolled_back_ and that is a bad bad thing.Currently, for this to work i make vanila sql insert using an SqlCommand, and i want to change that. (Why? because i don't want to make vanilla inserts they are susceptible to errors due to schema/model changes, and i got the OR/M for that)
How? i want to notify NHibernate somehow to execute the SqlCommand to corresponds to the Save() insert (hell, it can do all the SqlCommands it has gathered) but without it commiting or flushing!.
Currently i'm also searching for the prepared sql statement that nhibernate produces when flushing/commiting a saved object. Maybe i can just take that string and run it in my SqlCommand that is enlisted in the Transaction.
I'm building an ASP.NET MVC site that uses LINQ to SQL. In my search method that has some required and some optional parameters, I want to build a LINQ query while testing for the existence of those optional parameters.
Here's what I'm currently thinking: using(var db = new DBDataContext()) { IQueryable<Listing> query = null; //Handle required parameter query = db.Listings.Where(l => l.Lat >= form.bounds.extent1.latitude && l.Lat <= form.bounds.extent2.latitude); //Handle optional parameter if (numStars != null) query = query.Where(l => l.Stars == (int)numStars); //Other parameters... //Execute query (does this happen here?) var result = query.ToList(); //Process query...
Will this implementation "bundle" the where clauses and then execute the bundled query? If not, how should I implement this feature?
