DataSource Controls :: Version 661. This Server Supports Version 655
I have Visual Studio 2008 installed on this workstation with SQL 2000, 2005 Express, 2008 Express and I think 2008 R2 (not sure if that is a version itselve or not)
I will call that workstation HOME
I created some tables in SQLEXPRESS through VS2008.
I worked on this project on another workstation that I just installed VS2008 annd SQLEXPRESS 2008 and I know that was R2
Installed Visual Studio 2010 trial edition between the thiem I made the tables on HOME and tonight for the first time since that install
I am now getting the "cannot be opened becuase it is version Version 661. This Server supports version 655..."
What to do now?
I can opened SQLExpress 2008 management studio and it is running.
So is my SQL 2000. The problem seems to be that after the VS2010 install neither VS2008 or VS2010 can connect to the SQLExpress 2008
What do I do now?
I can't remove sql 2000 because it is tied to several 3+ gig databases that will not work in Express.
View 2 Replies (Posted: May 22, 2010 03:56 AM)
Sponsored Links:
Related Forum Messages For ASP.NET category:
DataSource Controls :: MS SQL Server ... Version / Installation And More Importantly Web Connection
I am having trouble installing SQL Server on my system ... it appears to install ok but when I try to connect it using Visual Web Developer Express 2008 it will not connect and mentions something about versions. I downloaded the Northwind database to carry on with the tutorials .. this also asked me to download the MS SQL 2000 version which I tried and this also did not work, other versions include 2005 and 2008. When I tried to open the program through the programs file from "Start Menu" only the configuration manager folder is there. I have also tried to install the trial version from the website but to no avail. Each time I have restored to factory settings on my laptop and it still fails to connect. I notice that when I restore to factory settings there are loads of icons where the uninstall window lists all of the programs and there is still SQL Server 2008, lots of Icons. I think that version 2008 came with the laptop as it is a business sony vaio sr vgn-sr46gd model with vista business.
Posted: Jan 05, 2011 07:32 PM
View 1 Replies!
View Related
DataSource Controls :: Can't Login When On The Server: SQL Server Version?
I'm trying to implement a regular ol' out of the box asp.net login system on SQL Server for the first time ever, and it's giving me way more grief than I ever imagined. Everything works great on my local asp.net testing server, but I can't get it working on the web server. I just get the generic- Server Error in '/' Application. A tech at my host mentioned that he thought that it was because I was using an ASPNETDB.MDF file created in SQL Express 2008 on a SQL Server 2005 server. I makes sense but I've seen a half dozen or more possible solutions in the many hours/days I've spent researching this but I hadn't heard of that one.
Posted: Apr 01, 2010 03:38 AM
View 7 Replies!
View Related
DataSource Controls :: The User Instance Login Flag Is Not Supported On This Version Of SQL Server
I have never created my own solution before now. I have always modified existing solutions and know how to do it. For some reason, this new solution isn't connecting to my SQL server correctly. I am using VWD 2008 Express Edition. I have MSSQL 2008 Developer Edition. I have used aspnet_regsql.exe to create the tables in my SQL DB. I have added the following to my webconfig: [Code].... But for some reason, when I try to use the Web Site Administration Tool it thinks it is not setup. What am I missing?
Posted: May 20, 2010 06:45 PM
View 1 Replies!
View Related
Firefox Version Wrong With Request.Browser.Version?
I'm try to get my site to detect what browser someone is using to ensure they're using one that is compliant with our site. Everything works, except Firefox seems to post the wrong version in the Request.Browser variables.I'm on Firefox 3.6.10, but Request.Browser shows Mozilla 1.9.2.10. It's correct in the HTTP_USER_AGENT string: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 YFF35 Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Is there a way to detect it better without having to parse through the HTTP_USER_AGENT string?
Posted: Sep 26, 2010 06:49 PM
View 3 Replies!
View Related
C# - FormsAuthenticationTicket.Version Returns Invalid Version Number
Is there any limit on the size/numbers in the version number of the FormsAuthenticationTicket. I tried to create an ASP.NET cookie using forms authentication, with a large version number(ex: 1234567 need this number for identification purposes). But when I decrypt the cookie I get 135 as the version number. Initially the old forms authentication cookie was removed, in order to add new information. Response.Cookies.Remove(FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName); Following is the code I used to create the FormsAuthentication cookie. FormsAuthenticationTicket newAuthTicket = new FormsAuthenticationTicket(1234567, un, DateTime.Now, DateTime.Now.AddHours(5F), false, user_data); HttpCookie newauthCookie = new HttpCookie(FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName, FormsAuthentication.Encrypt(newAuthTicket)); Response.Cookies.Add(newauthCookie); After retrieving the cookie, the version number I got was 135. This number varies with different version numbers. string cookieName = FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName; HttpCookie authCookie = Context.Request.Cookies[cookieName]; if (authCookie == null) { return; } FormsAuthenticationTicket authTkt = null; authTkt = FormsAuthentication.Decrypt(authCookie.Value); if (authTkt == null) { return; } int versionID = authTkt.Version; Can someone let me know if it's a bad idea to use such big version numbers, or am I missing something in this.
Posted: Mar 8 at 22:58
View 1 Replies!
View Related
C# - How To Upgrade Ajaxcontroltoolkit Version From 3.0.20820.0 To Version 3.5.40412.2
i am working in webapplication in asp.net using c#.I have a problem that currently i am using ajaxcontroltoolkit version 3.0.20820.0 but in this toolkit i don't have Editor Ajax control so i want to upgrade it with new version ajaxcontroltoolkit version 3.5.40412.2 When i upgrade it then my old ajax control is not working like validatorcalloutextender and requiredfieldvalidator etc. so please tell me how can i upgrade ajaxcontroltoolkit version from 3.0.20820.0 to version 3.5.40412.2 i also use in web.config file but not successfull.
Posted: Jan 5 at 6:32
View 1 Replies!
View Related
DataSource Controls :: 'ASPNEDB.mdf' Cannot Be Opened Because It Is Version 655
i have a breand new laptop with only the OS installed. I have installed VS2008 and its updates I also installed VS2010 and its updates. I started to recieve the above error when I try to access SQLExpress through the VS interface. I deleted both version and all the SQL referances in the Install/Uninstall listing. I have reinstalled VS2008 and its updates and I still get this message... I find lots or solutions for this error when moving DB's from one machine to another. What am I supposed to do? Do I delete EVERYTHING (includein the OS) and start from scratch again!
Posted: Nov 26, 2010 04:08 PM
View 5 Replies!
View Related
AJAX :: The Requested Script Resource 'Common.Common.js' Requires Version 'ControlToolkit, Version=4?
I have a solution I'm working on in VS2010 Professional, using ASP.NET 4.0 with the AJAX Toolkit.This has been working fine, but when I started it up today, I got the runtime exception shown above. This exception occurs on any page with a control from the toolkit.Sometimes when I load a page, I get an exception "Could not load file or assembly 'System.Windows, Version=2.0.5.0, Culture=neutral, ublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified." If I then reload the page (without making any changes), I then get the exception shown in the subject line.I tried dragging an AJAX Toolkit control from the toolbox onto a page, and then deleting it, and that worked - once. The next time I tried the page (or any other), I got the exception again. Dragging a control out didn't help this time.
Posted: Aug 11, 2010 03:38 PM
View 5 Replies!
View Related
DataSource Controls :: The Provider Is Not Compatible With The Version Of Oracle Client?
I have a website in which code on the production server runs no problem. The same code on my local machine or test server produces the mess seen at the end. The exact same code. Additionally, upon trying to preview any of the table adapters in the dataset I get "DataSet1.thename could not be previewed. The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client" The app is SQL Server. It always has been. It has never used Oracle. Does anyone have any insight on how to fix this? As it is now I can't do anything with my dataset. I can't edit anything in there because of this complaint about Oracle. [Code]....
Posted: Jan 21, 2011 12:35 AM
View 1 Replies!
View Related
DataSource Controls :: Difference In Performance Between The Workgroup And Standard Version?
I have been searching and reading a lots of information on the microsoft website about the different version of SQL server, but still can not make my decision. In term of performance, is there a real big difference between the workgroup and the standard version? The workgroup is limited to 3 GB of RAM while the standard is unlimited, would that really change the performance if my server has 16Gb or RAM? The price difference is pretty substantial so if could only have to buy the workgroup , it would be better. One more question, regarding the type of licence, my server has 2 processors, could I avoid buying 2 licences and get the Server plus CAL instead. I am using this server to host 4 web-application running on SQL server. Each database is about 15 MB.
Posted: Feb 19, 2008 01:28 PM
View 3 Replies!
View Related
DataSource Controls :: LINQ Version Number For Conflict Detection
I am a little confused by LINQ to SQL conflict detection. I know that in order to use the Attach(obj, true) method on a disconnected object, the table must have a 'timestamp/version' column. In our database we have an UpdateId column that is supposed to be incremented every time an update occurs. It is not an autonumber column. At present, this column is configured in DBML as UpdateCheck = Always Timestamp = false Auto Generated Value = false Auto-Sync = false and we have partial functions for each table where X is the table name) that look as follows to maually update the UpdateId: [Code].... When I tried the following settings for the UpdateId column, I got a conflict error due to my manual updating of the UpdateId UpdateCheck = Always Timestamp = true Auto Generated Value = true Auto-Sync = true so I removed the UpdateId += 1 line from the code. When I do this, I no longer get an error and when SubmitChanges is called on the DataContext everything updates correctly in the database EXCEPT the UpdateId which never gets changed. Is this a misunderstanding on my part or am I missing something vital in the setup / code which will make the UpdateId update whenever SubmitChanges() occurs?
Posted: Jan 09, 2009 02:10 AM
View 3 Replies!
View Related
SQL Server :: How To Get From Express To Full Version
I have recently got myself a hosting service which comes with SQL Server 2008 R1. My own machine currently runs SQL Server 2008 Express but I would also like to upgrade my own machine so that there are no compatibility issues/limitations going forward. I have access to the full version of SQL via my websitespark subscription, however having downloaded it, the installation process doesnt offer me any upgrade path or the ability to create a new instance. So how do I get from Express to full version?
Posted: Jan 02, 2011 03:17 PM
View 6 Replies!
View Related
SQL Server :: This Version Of Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Can Only Be Used To Connect To SQL Server?
I have SQL Server 2005 in my computer.I am using SQL Server 2005 for Development. I can connect to my local & "COMPAQSQLEXPRESS" Server. But while connecting to Remote Server i m getting the following error TITLE: Connect to Server ------------------------------ Cannot connect to x.x.xxx.xx. ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This version of Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio can only be used to connect to SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 servers. (ConnectionDlg) ------------------------------ BUTTONS:OK -----------------------------
Posted: Jan 20, 2011 08:06 AM
View 4 Replies!
View Related
NLB And Using MS Web Deploy To Push A New Version Of The Application To One Server
I have two webservers in a cluster serving a web application. Using MS Web Deploy to push a new version of the application to one server, and then again to synchronize the files to the other server in the cluster. It seems to be the most ordinary thing to do. But wouldn't there be a problemm, when one server is deployed with the new version, and the other is not yet finished. Will it not cause troubles, when a page loaded with the new version makes a webservice request and the balancer sends the request to the server with the old version? What's the best way to avoid this? I thought about scripting a drainstop of the server, that we deploy to, and make sure only one server is running at a time. But I can't find anyone else, who seems to have written about such a solution. And guess that it doesn't scale very well too. Another solution could be to shut down all servers when updating. But that doesn't seems very clever.
Posted: Apr 26 10 at 9:05
View 2 Replies!
View Related
Installation :: Can Multiple Version Of C# Hosting On Same Server
we have hosted .NEt 1.0, 2.0 web pages on the same windows server 2000 machine. Similar situations happens on another windows server 2003 machine. Now, we have new applications written in .NET 3.5 , if running this on windows server 2000, is it still possible? On the windows server 2003 machine, is it possible to run both .NET 1.1, 2.0, 3.5 asp.net web pages with different virtual directory at the same time?
Posted: Dec 07, 2009 06:48 AM
View 5 Replies!
View Related
SQL Server :: ISP Updated To SQL Version That VS 2008 Can't Handle ?
I have unexpectedly found that I cannot access my data tables from VS 2008. A window comes up saying "The server version is not supported. Only servers up to Microsoft SQL server 2005 are supported". Also, as a consequence I imagine, two web sites which refer to datatable have stopped working. Has my ISP updated to an SQL version that VS 2008 can't handle ?
Posted: Dec 04, 2010 07:11 PM
View 3 Replies!
View Related
JQuery Version Conflict Resolution With .NET Server Control
I am developing an ASP.NET server control that uses jQuery for some client side logic. I have embedded the jQuery file as a resource inside the control. don't want to restrict the application using the control to that specific version of jQuery and I want to keep using the version of jQuery that I have embedded.I know about the noconflict method but the problem that i see with that is that i have no control over the order of the script tags on the pag
Posted: Mar 16 at 5:56
View 2 Replies!
View Related
Cannot Show Excel Columns In Server Version Application
I my application , i need load all the columns of the excel sheet to show in the screen. when I run throug vs2008 everything is ok, the columns can show on the listbox, but when I publish to the server and run in the server version (though browse enter the web site), It did not show the columns in the listbox, but no error. I used Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application service to open the excel file. below is the relative codes protected void getExcelCols(string path, int page) { ApplicationClass app = [Code]....
Posted: May 26, 2009 03:38 PM
View 2 Replies!
View Related
SQL Server Connection Client Tried To Connect To An Unsupported Version?
We recently launched a new web site.there are roughly ~150 users active during peak hours.During peak hours,we are experiencing an issue every few minutes,the exception text is listed below. System.Web.HttpUnhandledException: Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpUnhandledException' was thrown. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The client was unable to establish a connection because of an error during connection initialization process before login. Possible causes include the following: the client tried to connect to an unsupported version of SQL Server; the server was too busy to accept new connections; or there was a resource limitation (insufficient memory or maximum allowed connections) on the server.(provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 0 - No process is on the other end of the pipe.) Our data access layer calls various DataTableAdapters using the following syntax. EDIT Yes, da is the name assigned to the DataTableAdapter. There is no connection.Open() because the DataTableAdapter takes care of all that, right? using(TheDataLayer.some.strongly.typedNameTableAdapters.suchAndSuchTableAdapter da [code]... The connection string looks something like: <add name="MyConnectionString" connectionString="Data Source=myDBServerName;Initial Catalog=MyDB;User ID=MyUserName;Password=MyPassword" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> I'm trying to rule the problem being in Code.Is there anything "simple" that can be done to minimize this issue?
Posted: Jul 21, 2010 06:03 PM
View 6 Replies!
View Related
Windows Server Version Requirements Needed When Contacting Web Hosting Provider?
We are trying to implment some forms written in ASP.NET 2.0 and I'm trying to understand what Windows server version requirements are needed when contacting a web hosting provider etc? I see there are many versions from 1.0, 2.0, 3.5 and 4.0 which appears to be the latest version, well as far as I can see. Therefore if we sign up for hosting services and the provider only have only version 4 will this be backward compatible to support our ASP.NET 2.0 forms?
Posted: Nov 30, 2010 12:48 PM
View 3 Replies!
View Related
|
TRACKER
