I have an several controllers where I want every ActionResult to return the same viewdata. In this case, I know I will always need basic product and employee information.
Right now I've been doing something like this:
[code]....
This is just pseudo-code so forgive any obvious errors, is there a better way to be doing this? I thought of having my controller inherit a class that pretty much does the same thing you see here, but I didn't see any great advantages to that. It feels like what I'm doing is wrong and unmaintable, what's the best way to go about this?
I have a small question and I think this is asked before but I can't seem to find it...I have 2 pages:
/Default.aspx /Profile/Default.aspx
The resource file for the /Default.aspx is in /App_LocalResources/Default.aspx.resx but where do I place the Default.aspx.resx for the /Profile/Default.aspx? When I place it in /App_LocalResources/Profile/Default.aspx.resx it keeps telling me the resource isn't found...I access the resources like this: <%$ Resources:lblHeader.Text %>
Usually I use this code to read a file from beginning to end into a List<> and then I write to a file with the code I have above.It seems that StreamReader/StreamWriter is not possible to use in Global.asax.I simply might wonder how I can convert this code for Global.asax?
I'm working on a new C# web application in Visual Studio 2010, and am having problems reading a value in Web.Debug.Config from the GLobal.asax.cs file.
In the Application_Start event I've got the following code:
When running in debugger, I've got a break-point in the Application_Start event in Global.asax.cs. It hits the break point, but in all cases the value coming back from ConfigurationManager is coming back null. What am I doing wrong?
Currently in my personal website I'm building I'm using a global static Config class to hold everything configurable I might need to change that is semi-global. So right now it looks about like this:
[code]....
Is using a global config class like this an anti-pattern of some sort? Also, I prefer for my connection strings to be outside of web.config. I like my web.config to be as minimal as possible.
I used ModalPopup Control on this link, [URL]How should I write the code that to close pop up by click the area outside the pop up panel?I use AjaxControlToolkit-Framework3.5SP1
I have a .NET 3.5, C#, Silverlight 3, and LINQ Solution. My issue is this:
When a User goes to login I want to set a global class User; it has the properties of UserName and SecurityLevelId.
Then allow them access rights depending on SecurityLevelId. The real problem occurs because this project loads App page which calls the Shell page which calls the Navigation class. On Navigation instantiation it actually instantiates 6 other pages BEFORE you even get to the Login page.
So how in the World am I supposed to set and check all this if the page is loaded before I even go to it?
I have a property on my Global.asax.cs class that I need to access from a business class, i.e. using HttpContext.Current. How do I do this? Global.asax.cs (in a web project)
public partial class Global : System.Web.HttpApplication { public static ProxyGenerator Generator = new ProxyGenerator(); Business class (in a separate business project) var generator = ((Sei.Osp.Web.Global)HttpContext.Current.ApplicationInstance)
This obviously doesn't work and I don't want to reference the whole web project in the business project as it will create a circular reference (the business project is already referenced in the web project)
UPDATE:
To clarify - the property I'm creating holds an instance of the Castle Dynamic Proxy Generator class. I've read that you shouldn't just create this all over the place. So I thought I'd create it in my Global.asax.cs and then just use that instance wherever I need to create a proxy class (I'm using it to do AOP) Is there a better way of doing this?
I have added global.asax file in my webservice project. in webservice project i have one class file name as 'Class1.vb' in this class contain some methods() , i want to access those methods from 'class1.vb' in global.asax.vb file. any body knows how to access those methods in global.asax.vb. file
am currently working on a web application, whereby I want to add code to the Application_BeginRequest method of the Global.asax file, without adding code to the Global.asax file, which sounds a little crazy, let me explain a bit more.If anyone has ever developed in sitecore before, they would have seen that the Global.asax file has empty methods, however it has 'using Sitecore;' and the global.asax file provided does not inherit from System.Web.HttpApplication.
I need to keep a global variable throughout the whole time the user is at my site, but do I use Application or a static class? The string variable should store a region name and my site makes a few changes depending on which region that has been set.
I read that Application was mainly for classic ASP, but I also read that a static class cannot be instantiated at runtime (e.g. when the user has logged in).
So, have I got something wrong here and which solution do I use?
I know there is a couple answered questions on here regarding "request scoped" globals, but I want to nit-pick on something specifically and maybe squeeze some extra enlightenment out of one or two of you.I have an ASP.NET C# Website and a static Dictionary of objects (loaded from DB once on Application start). Each page request will need to do a lookup in the Dictionary (based on a key derived from the request url/etc) and get the appropriate object.The issue is I'm trying to maximize efficiency by reducing the lookups to the Dictionary per Request. Doing just a single lookup within a Page itself is easy enough and I can pass the object to sub controls, etc too.. but global.asax is separate from the Page and it also needs to use the object (in Application_BeginRequest and Session_Start).
So is doing a Dictionary lookup once in Application_BeginRequest, once (when necessary) in Session_Start and once in the Page negligible speed wise, even if there are many requests coming in every second?I would like it if I could just have a Request scoped global variable that I can easily call upon.. the only one I see available though is HttpContext.Current.Items and that is a Dictionary itself.Am I beingridiculously nit-picky with my concern over efficiency? or will these milliseconds (nanoseconds?) get me in the long run when more and more requests are being made?
PS. I currently only have around 100 objects in the Dictionary although this may increase in the future.
Possible Duplicate: How we can add write access to a directory programmaticaly in C#? When I make a Directory with Directory class in C#, it is read only. what is the problem? How we can change this attribute programmatically?
My routes work in the Global.asax, but I created an Area called Dashboard and while it works with the default route, it doesn't when I implement the T4MVC route.
Here's my Dashboard Area Registration class:
[Code]....
If I view this in a browser with the above settings, any Html.ActionLinks render as empty strings, no routing at all.Here's the rendered HTML from the route.
I've an Admin area and I want only Admins to enter the area. I considered adding the Authorized attribute to every controller in the Admin area. Isn't there an elegant solution or is this feature not there in the framework itself?
EDIT:
I should to have mentioned this before. I'm using a custom AuthorizedAttribute derived from AuthorizeAttribute.
On a pager I use on my MVC site I create the page links as follows:
[Code]....
On a MVC 2 web site I have an area named CMS.For example, on "cms/article/list" the pager works fine.However, on my root views, for example in "article/index" the page 1 link become:[URL]On my Global.Asax I have the following:
[Code]....
I have been going around with this and I can't find a way to solve this problem.
Sure this is something obvious, but I can't see it.I have an area in my project, UserAdministration. Whenever I call anything in the area I get a 404 error.The AreaRegistration class contains:
[Code]....
The AdminController contains a method for Index.RouteDebug shows the route is to the correct controller (Admin) and action (Index).
I have moved AccountController to area named 'Backend', but when I adding [Authorize] attribute to any action and then come to this website, it redirects me to error page: