Can someone tell me if its possible to run both a 64bit compiled web site and a 32bit compiled website on the same IIS7.5 machine. The core OS would be Windows 2008 R2 64bit. I looked around and can only find how to switch the appPools to 32 or 64. But the question I want answered is can you have one appPool 32bit and another 64bit?
View 1 RepliesMy asp.net 2005 old application was working on windows 2003 server. I have used asp.net hashcode method to store user password in database. Now I shifted my asp.net 2005 application on windows 2008 R2 server. But my Password hashcode logic is not working due to 64bit windows 2008 server architecture & 64 bit IIS 7. I dont want to set IIS on 32bit mode.
So How can I check my 32bit user password on windows 2008 64bit server with 64 bit IIS without changing hashcode logic?Â
I'm trying to deploy a site to a 64bit OS. I'm deploying to IIS6. The site was developed on a 32bit server. The site deployed correctly however it's trying to access a COM component and that is failing.
I believe the error is occurring because the COM component is a 64bit version on the 64bit OS. And IIS6 is running in 32bit mode on the 64bit server.
I'd like to confirm this but I can't seem to find a definitive way to check if IIS6 is in 32bit mode or 64bit mode.
Would someone know the best way to check if IIS6 is in 64bit or 32bit mode?
EDIT: I'm using IIS6
I would like to know whether there is a way to determine programatically if IIS is installed in 32bit or 64bit mode.
View 6 RepliesI'm trying to install a 32-bit ASP.NET application onto a 64-bit IIS server running on Windows Server 2008. This is a clean installation of the operating system with no other applications installed.As a prerequisite for our installation, we run the 32-bit version of aspnet_regiis -iIt fails with the following message: The error indicates that IIS is not installed on the machine. Please install IIS before using this tool.Additionally:IIS is definitely installed. The 64 bit version of aspnet_regiis runs cleanly without warnings.€œEnable 32 bit applications" is set to True in the DefaultAppPool's Advanced Settings.
The IIS Metabase and IIS 6 configuration compatibility" component is installed.We have a test VM where this error occurs as well as test VM where both the 32 bit and 64 bit versions of aspnet_regiis run without errors. We've had no luck distinguishing the differences between the two test VMs.We have struggled with this issue for several days to no avail.
I have a website designed using .net 1.1 and upgraded to 2.0. It works fine on Win NT. However, the same application is not working on Win 2003 64 bit server. I read some article on web. Everyone recommends that IIS should run on 32bit mode in win 2003 server if the app was orginated from 32bit. So, I made IIS to run on 32bit mode. The problem is now asp.net config tab is missing in IIS. Is it recommended to convert IIS to run on 32bit in Win 2003 64 bit edition? If so, how do I keep the asp.net configuration tab? Why cant the 32 bit app unable to run on 64bit? Any conversion tool available to upgrade from 32bit to 64bit?
View 2 RepliesI've got ASP.NET 4.0 application running on a 64bit OS. IIS is configured to run in 64bit mode (needs to be to support other ASP.NET applications). Is there any way to do this? Oracle doesn't provide a 64bit client as of this writing for .NET 4.0.
View 1 Repliesgetting a new laptop at work and I'm curious what, if any, issues I'm going to encounter when I move from my 32bit laptop to my 64bit laptop running Win7 64bit and VS 2008/2010 64bit.Many of the applications (web and windows) that I maintain are 32bit and are installed on 32bit servers
View 2 RepliesApologies if this is is in the wrong place but I'm not sure where this issue fits. My issue deals with setting up an ASP.NET 64bit website on IIS6 (W2003 R2) so it could be a compiling problem or an IIS setup issue - I've read so much now I'm all tied up in knots.I have a web app which has been written on top of my company's custom framework, both have been compiled in .Net 2.0 with the "AnyCPU" option and run quite happily on my laptop within Visual Studio 2008 (on a Windows 7 Enterprise 64bit laptop). All of the code is managed code with the exception of 1 3rd party dll that I think is still 32bit.
Question 1: when running on my laptop in VS, is my web app running in 32bit or 64bit mode, given the OS is 64bit? I have both versions of .NET 2.0 installed.I have a new desktop that is to be our test server, and has been installed with Windows 2003 R2 and had IIS6 configured (same as the production environment). Again, both versions of .NET 2.0 are installed. When I copy my web app to the server and browse to the site, I get the dreaded "%1 is not a valid Win32 application", and sometimes (depending on what settings I've been playing with) "Service Unavailable" messages. If I register the .NET version to 32bit, and set the IIS 'Enable32bitAppOnWin64' to true, the app runs happliy the same as when on my laptop......but I don't want it to do that! I want to run IIS to run in 64bit mode with the 64bit .NET 2.0 Framework!Question 2: What does IIS see to make it think that my app is a Win32 app or am I interpreting that message wrong? Is the fact that I have 1 32bit dll in the in folder enough for IIS to say "32bit" and keel over?
My understanding of the "AnyCPU" option was that as long as the code is all managed code within the application, the bitness of the OS does not matter so I cannot understand why IIS6 cannot run the app in 64bit mode....and no, installing IIS7 is not an option.
I have created three basic websites using VS2010 and they are working fine when invidually run from visual studio. But in order to get the full functionality of the websites, they have to be run simultaneously. There are iframes inside one contaning pages from other website.
What is the way it can be done? Is hosting the only solution to it? If so please tell me how to host them in IIS7( i am currently running on windows 7 release candidate)
This may be obvious to many of you (hopefully!) I have a site under asp.net created using Visual Web Developer 2008 and MSSQL 2007 (all express editions)All ok so far.My PSP requires the addition of a couple of traditional ASP 'screens' to redirect payments to them. I cannot run this under VWD2008 development server as .asp are not allowed, so am looking to move to running it locally under IIS7 which is turned on.How do I alter the site to run on the IIS7 instance?
View 3 RepliesI want my .net2.0 webservice application to run on IIS7.0 under CLR4.0, Is this possible simply creating an apppool with Classic,.netframework 4.0 settings and pointing my app to this pool? I have tried this and it works fine, but want to confirm on right track?
View 2 RepliesI changed the maxAllowedContentLength to
<security>
<requestFiltering>
<requestLimits maxAllowedContentLength="5024000000" />
</requestFiltering>
</security>
In my web.config, but when running on IIS7 I get this error:
The 'maxAllowedContentLength' attribute is invalid. Not a valid unsigned integer
but when I run in the VS server it run normally without any errors.
How to config my website to allow upload files with 500MB size, without this problem on IIS7?
Is it possible to determine the managed pipeline IIS7 is running under in ASP.NET?
View 1 RepliesI am trying to port an existing ASP.Net 1.1 website to another web server that currently runs IIS7 and a number of websites that target either .Net 2.0, 3.5 or 4.0. All other sites continue to work perfectly. Unfortunately, I can only browse static files on the newly imported site. If I try to access any of the Features in IIS7 for the new sit
View 1 RepliesI'm using ASP.net 3.5 to run a .exe with Process.Start(). It works fine if I use the host that's built-in to VS2008, WinServer 2003 but if I use IIS7 it no longer runs. I am using the following code.
Process proc =
new
Process();
proc.StartInfo = psi;
proc.StartInfo.FileName = "cmd.exe";
proc.StartInfo.Arguments = args;
proc.Start();
I am deploying a public ASP.NET website on an IIS7 web farm.
The application runs on 3 web servers and is behind a firewall.
We want to create a single page on the website that is accessible only to internal users. It is primarily used for diagnostics, trigger cache expiry, etc.
/admin/somepage.aspx
What is the best way to control access to this page? We need to:
Prevent all external (public) users from accessing the URL. Permit specific internal users to access the page, only from certain IPs or networks.
Should this access control be done at the (a) network level, (b) application level, etc.?
Does anybody knows if it is possible to make URL routing in a ASP.Net webforms website that is running under the Classic .NET AppPool.
I've tried a few things here, but it just works when I switch from Classic AppPool to Default AppPool.
** the web site MUST run under Classic AppPool.
I have a need to run an application in classic mode for backwards compatibility with a specific application, and am trying to understand what kind of impact that will have on the performance of an MVC application that is running on the site. If we put a few static file maps (for .js, .css, .png, etc) above the ASP.NET wildcard map to reduce the amount of processing by the ASP.NET handler, will we be approaching the integrated mode in terms of performance?
The thing i'm primarily concerned with is any effect this might have on output caching. I understand that integrated mode might (?) allow for the output cache to handle non ASP.NET content, but that isn't really a concern. We're more interested in ensuring that the MVC application has full use of the output cache. Empirically i've found that the two configurations operate on par when things go well, but if the page references resources that are not available, the integrated mode tends to fail much more quickly than the classic mode (e.g. 500 ms vs 10 seconds), reducing 'hang time' on the page load.
i have one problem in executing the ssrs reports..
i've developed one project for that project there are some SSRS reports which are deployed
in path ( "http://localhost/reports/") it is working fine...
when i run through the project and press F5 ( i.e execute) the reports
are displaying correct with full of content in that...
now i want to host that project.. so i've created one virtual folder named as proj in IIS7..
and i've assigned the project to that..
when i execute from IE7 and type the path http://localhost/proj then the main page is displayed
and when i click the button print then it is showing the empyt report with only the toolbar above
no content are there in reports ...
but when the run the project i.e F5 then the report is displayed with full of content...
I have created an entity model and linked service which works fine when testing from within VStudio 2010 but when I publish and browse to svc I get an HTTP 500 error. Thought this might be linked to db credentials (anonymouss access) so set this to fixed sa login as test , no success. Also have set all IIS app pool to use v4.0 of .net. Using IIS7 running under Windows 7, svc entityaccessrule set to "*".
View 1 RepliesI've written a small MVC application and am having trouble deploying it to localhost. I use the publish feature when I browse http://localhost this is what I get: HTTP Error 403.14 - Forbidden The Web server is configured to not list the contents of this dir A sample aspx page is rendered correctly.
I've tried the aspnet_regiis -r I've made sure ASP.NET is installed in Windows Features. The web platform installer tells me MVC 2.0 is installed. I did install VS2010 first and then IIS so I suspect that maybe causing problems but in the past aspnet_regiis -r has fixed that.
the account we use to copy/publish websites to our web server is not allowing us access to push websites. I've added this account to the permissions in the links listed in the below link, but i don't have success when trying to push remotely. When the account is in the local admins account, everything works flawlessly, but we are not allowed to have it in there. http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vssetup/thread/31be047e-4716-4974-b8a1-be0111b50199 I've googled and searched a lot for this particular error, but am not finding an answer that helps. We get this error, 'Unable to create the Web 'http://edea01/test/planning'. You are not authorized to perform the current operation', and the above link is the scenario that matches mine the most. I don't do develompment work, but am asked to figure out this connection problem.
View 3 RepliesI've gone through the process of installing the environment of a large project which I'm involved with, on a new machine with Win7 32bit and Visual Studio 2008.I HAVE to install ASP.NET Ajax Extensions but being so old at it is, it requires .Net Framework 2.0 or 3.0 instaled. The installers of 2.0 or 3.0 will not install and I just get a massage that I need to install them (2.0 or 3.0) through the Windows Components dialog ("Turn Windows features on and of" dialog). This is not possible because the only framework available there is 3.5.1 which is no good for the Ajax Extensions.Removing the 3.5.1 in order to install 2.0 or 3.0 doesn't work either and result in the same massage.Since Microsoft haven't yet come up with some new extension package (as far as know), I'm stuck in a dead end. What do I do?
View 6 RepliesTrying to get my server updated with 64bit versions of .net 3.0 sp1, 3.0 sp2, and 3.5 sp1 before instaling 4.0. However. ASP.NET Download page only gives me one option - download and install windows platform installer with 4.0 and it doesn't seem to even realize that I am running 64bit.