I want to create a method with optional parameters in my wcf service. I am doing it like this
[Code]....
When I try to use it in my client application and try to pass the values only for first two parameters it gives me an error that"Argument not sepecified for parameter Status"
I want to define a route that have 2 optional parameters in the middle of the URL the start an end parameters are digits
[Code].....
I have an MVC action on my abstract BaseControlller like this (and this action is common across all inheriting controllers):
//
// GET: /controller/RenderForm/{formType}
[Authorize(Roles = "Administrators")]
public ActionResult RenderForm(FormType formType, BaseContentObject contentObject)
[code]...
I have a controller method that is called with many different combinations of URL's. To overcome issue i am using optional parameters.here is my controller method signature...public ActionResult localMembersSearch(string Gender, string calling, [Optional]string Region, [Optional]string County, [Optional]string Town, [Optional]string queryvalues)the first two parameters are not optional but always expect
View 1 RepliesI want to add optional parameters in my routing table.For example I would like the users to browse a product catalog like this:http://www.domain.com/browse/by-category/electronics/1,2,3 etc
routes.MapPageRoute(
"ProductsBrowse",
"browse/{BrowseBy}/{Category}",
"~/Pages/Products/Browse.aspx"
I've already implemented URL routing in my app but there are cases where I may or may not get a paramter. In particular, I'm trying to come up with a good way to handle multi-language support. For example, if my regular URL is /SomeCategory/Friendly-Topic-URL, I want to have an optional language selector at the end but I'd like to be optional. So, if I get /SomeCategory/Friendly-Topic-URL/es, that should bring up the topic in Spanish but if get nothing, that should bring up English.
View 6 RepliesI'm trying to implement a search function on an incident logging page that is working fine. Currently I am only able to search against one criteria at a time, using the following route:
View 2 RepliesI'm using the iis7 URL Rewrite module and it's working fine, except for two things. Being new to this, I might be missing something obvious.
1) My URL gets converted from www.mysite.com/search.aspx?fName=John&sName=Smith to www.mysite.com/John/Smith. This works fine, but if I add a trailing / , a few images on the site disappear, wheras a few don't. (They're all in the same location). However, the search results are fine.
2) Is it possible to make cerain querystrings optional? Server side, this is implemented (i.e. if nothing is entered, then assume a default value). But how would this work with the URL rewrite module? e.g. www.mysite.com/John would search for John and use a default value for the sName parameter.
I have the following JSON class I am intending to use to perform management calls on my database asynchronously:
<script type="text/javascript">
var CalendarManager = {
defaultOptions: {
staffcode: 0, // required
date: 0, // required
[Code]....
Basically, my question is: how do I specify optional parameters to a WebMethod when providing JSON data?
I know I can reduce the parameters down to just the required values, and then use HttpContext.Request.Params to read the values of optional paramaters, but I would have thought the way I have tried here should have worked.
EDIT
The XMLHttpRequest.responseText value for the error is:
Invalid JSON primitive: staffcode.
This is throwing me even more off the scent of the problem :(
I have a GridView bound to an DataSource query with parameters tied to form controls.What is the standard / best-practices way to handle optional query parameters?
View 3 RepliesI get a 404 error when I navigate to the following URL using the route below:
http://localhost:53999/properties/
However, all the following are correctly routed to the List action in my controller:
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa/new-york/manhattan/12
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa/new-york/manhattan
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa/new-york
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa [Code]....
In PropertiesController.cs: [Code]....
It looks like it should just go to the default controller/action,
I'm creating a webpage with serveral web controls to set search parameters for querying an SQL table. My plan is to use a TableAdapter to hold the query. If the user decides not to use one, several, or any of the web controls to filter their search, I want the SELECT to execute without complaining that it doesn't have parameter values. Should my SQL query look like
[Code]....
I have a data grid with a lot of information on it - to easily filter the data, I would like to be able to pass parameters to it. My problem is that I do not want the parameters to be required. So if I just put 1 or 2 of them in the query string, I would like for it to return all of the data related to those two parameters.I am using a data grid & stored procedures:My Stored Procedure looks like this:
[Code]...
In my stored procedure I have declared some parameters as NULL values(Optional Parameters).
In my C#.NET code I didn't use the parameters to pass values to Stored Procedure's NULL
Parameters. So I am getting Exception.
I don't want to pass parameters from my code.Because I have declared 30 parameters in my
Stored Procedure as NULL values.
Is there any other way to execute Stored Procedure from Front End without passing values to
Optional Parameters in SQL stored procedure?
I was expecting a parameter will become a empty string value if the parameter is missing, but it turn out to be null. have I done it wrong for the optional parameter?
[Code]....
I mean can I do something like this:
[Code]....
and then implement it the same way as below
List<String> GetEmployees(String EmployeeId, String DepartmentID= "00")
{
}
I tried this, but it didn't work. Its always expecting DepartmentID when I tried to use invoke 'GetEmployees' using service reference.
so I have a web programming assignment for university where I'm building a website that uses an Access database but I have hit a brick wall with something.I'm using parameterized queries to query my database. For one of my queries, I want to be able to take a bunch of parameters that are optional, and if they aren't needed I'll pass in a value of null and I'd like the part of the where clause relevant to them to evaluate to true. This is straightforward in most databases, from my understanding you could do something like to make param1 an optional parameter.
WHERE ((@param1 = ARandomColumnName) OR (@param1 = null))
However this can't be done using Access, as all parameters in a query are represented by a ?. Every ? is assumed to refer to a different parameter, so if you want to use a parameter more than one (like the above code I wrote does) then you'd have to pass it twice. This seems hacky to meSo what do I do? I have spent *hours* googling and banging my head on the desk. I'll cry if I missed something really obvious
I created a WCF. The web.config is as follows,
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.web>
<compilation debug="true" />
</system.web>
<system.serviceModel>
</system.serviceModel>
<system.webServer>
<directoryBrowse enabled="true" />
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
The following can be seen in the service.svc file,
class AppServiceHostFactory : ServiceHostFactory
{
protected override ServiceHost CreateServiceHost(Type serviceType, Uri[] baseAddresses)
{
return new WebServiceHost2(serviceType, true, baseAddresses);
}
}
This is the method in the service.svc.cs,
[WebHelp(Comment="Sample description for GetData")]
[WebGet(UriTemplate="/GetData/param1/{i}/param2/{s}")]
[OperationContract]
public SampleResponseBody GetData(string i, string s)
{
// TODO: Change the sample implementation here
// if (i < 0) throw new WebProtocolException(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "param1 cannot be negative", null);
return new SampleResponseBody()
{
Value = String.Format("Sample GetData response: '{0}', '{1}'", i, s)
};
}
The following is the webservice url. It returns data if it's run through the asp.net engine but throws bad request when run from IIS. I added the following entry in the web.config but no use. it still fails.
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="1500000" executionTimeout="180"/>
[URL]-499,500~~~/param2/621100,621600,622100,611500,611600,611700,561300,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,621100,621600,622100,611500,611600,611700,561300,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,621100,621600,622100,611500,611600,611700,561300,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,,622100,611500,611600,611700,561300,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,622300,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,622300,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100,623100,623100,611100,611200,611300,611400,622200,622300,623100
i am working in the webservice project. I have one project when i run it then shows the text box for parameters and return the result after passing the parameters.
But another webservice does not allow me to enter the paramerters when execute then list of methods displayed and then show the soap xml when click at any method.
what difference found in both webserivces are Excuting-one that have the Text boxes: Test: "To test the operation using the HTTP POST protocol, click the 'Invoke' button."
2nd One Not provide the parameter text boxes: Test: "The test form is only available for methods with primitive types as parameters"
Dont know how to fix that. Because i want to debug the webservice and as i am unable to provide the parameter then how can i fix it.
how can i pass the parameters in the 2nd webservice as it has different information mentioned above.
I am creating a Web Service, which will be used by a client to send data to our Database.The client will be sending close to 30 fields that will be updated to our table. If I write a Web method, I will need to have all these 30 fields as parameters to that method. Is there a better way than sending all of them as parameters?
View 3 Repliesi have the following method, however i want to pass methods to it, i know how to do it the usual way, however when it comes to Webservices/API's what is the correct way to do it. Here is my method so far;
[Code]....
For example, we are going to consume web method GetEmployeeByQuery(ConnInfoXML, Query, RecordDetail), ConnInfoXML is login information in XML, Query is a SQL statement selecting records, RecordDetail is all records retrieved. All data are in XML format.
So how to write these parameters in XML to consume this web method and get all the information in XML, and then transfer XML to normal string format ?
I am consuming a web service in .aspx with a added web reference that links to http://www.webservicex.net/stockquote.asmx After this, I can get the result from
ebServiceX.StockQuote ws = new WebServiceX.StockQuote();String xmlString = s.GetQuote("XOM"); I am wondering how I can call the web service like GET, http://www.webservicex.net/stockquote.asmx/GetQuote?symbol=XOM+BAC
I have a fundamental question to ask about web services. I'm currently writing a service that has custom classes (lots of them). Let's say a car is one example. For some reason I was thinking that the service should expose these objects. However once I created a site to consume the service, it looks as though the classes are not meant to be exposed. It looks like the best practice is to take in a string which may be xml or not and convert that string into the object in the service code.(especially for error handling or input validation)
For example, if I had the web method:
[WebMethod]
public car getCar(int carId)
{
//code here to return car object
}
This will take a car ID and return a car object. It also shows all the elements in the SOAP request and response objects (as well as the WSDL) which can be to external developers. However, when trying to consume the service from a website (or reference it in my code), I then need access to the Car class (which implies i need to expose it through the services as well?).
I am a newbie to ASP.NET (but not to C#)I have a project I am developing that may seem unconventional at this point but it is a project that I hope to eventually expand and provide a new type of service on the internet. Currently the project makes use of an Excel spreadsheet that is generated by another application I wrote. Basically the spreadsheet is an index to a specific type of file that exists on a host computer and the files are directly linked from within the excel document. When the link is clicked it opens the file using the operating system default program which then processes the file (this takes some time).
This is fine and dandy but when I click on another file, the default program immediately stops processing one file and opens the latest submission and thus interrupting the previous job. To prevent this I am now writing a queuing application. Here is where ASP.NET comes in. I do not want the link to open the queuing application with the file to add into the queue as a parameter because that pops one or more nnoying/scary "you are opening an executable" dialogs and because I want to be able to access the queuing service from a remote computer, and possibily in the future over the web. Instead I am trying to use an ASP.NET service application that will accept the name of a file as a parameter, access the external queue class (defined in an external dll of which only one universal instance is allowed), and add the request to the queue. Whether or not the table is an excel table or on a web page, using a form in this instance is tedious, not only for me but for a user. I want the user to be able to simply click on an html link and have the file be queued without anything except maybe a confirmation page pop up saying that the file has been queued and it will take x amount of time before the file is finished processing.
My problem is I cannot for the life of me find a way to do this. I have searched the interenet for over a week now looking for a way to call a "WebMethod" using a link and I am getting the impression that it cannot be done. Even when I use a form and try to have the form pass a string (representing the file name) as its "action" it comes up with an application error saying that I am missing the parameter I am trying to pass. Here are some examples of what I have tried:Here an example method I would try to access:
[Code]....
Here is an example of how I tried to access directly by way of a link (which results in an application error: InvalidOperationException)"
[Code]....