I want to define a route that have 2 optional parameters in the middle of the URL the start an end parameters are digits
[Code].....
I get a 404 error when I navigate to the following URL using the route below:
http://localhost:53999/properties/
However, all the following are correctly routed to the List action in my controller:
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa/new-york/manhattan/12
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa/new-york/manhattan
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa/new-york
http://localhost:53999/properties/usa [Code]....
In PropertiesController.cs: [Code]....
It looks like it should just go to the default controller/action,
I have an MVC action on my abstract BaseControlller like this (and this action is common across all inheriting controllers):
//
// GET: /controller/RenderForm/{formType}
[Authorize(Roles = "Administrators")]
public ActionResult RenderForm(FormType formType, BaseContentObject contentObject)
[code]...
I want to create a method with optional parameters in my wcf service. I am doing it like this
[Code]....
When I try to use it in my client application and try to pass the values only for first two parameters it gives me an error that"Argument not sepecified for parameter Status"
I have a controller method that is called with many different combinations of URL's. To overcome issue i am using optional parameters.here is my controller method signature...public ActionResult localMembersSearch(string Gender, string calling, [Optional]string Region, [Optional]string County, [Optional]string Town, [Optional]string queryvalues)the first two parameters are not optional but always expect
View 1 RepliesI want to add optional parameters in my routing table.For example I would like the users to browse a product catalog like this:http://www.domain.com/browse/by-category/electronics/1,2,3 etc
routes.MapPageRoute(
"ProductsBrowse",
"browse/{BrowseBy}/{Category}",
"~/Pages/Products/Browse.aspx"
I've already implemented URL routing in my app but there are cases where I may or may not get a paramter. In particular, I'm trying to come up with a good way to handle multi-language support. For example, if my regular URL is /SomeCategory/Friendly-Topic-URL, I want to have an optional language selector at the end but I'd like to be optional. So, if I get /SomeCategory/Friendly-Topic-URL/es, that should bring up the topic in Spanish but if get nothing, that should bring up English.
View 6 RepliesI'm trying to implement a search function on an incident logging page that is working fine. Currently I am only able to search against one criteria at a time, using the following route:
View 2 RepliesI'm using the iis7 URL Rewrite module and it's working fine, except for two things. Being new to this, I might be missing something obvious.
1) My URL gets converted from www.mysite.com/search.aspx?fName=John&sName=Smith to www.mysite.com/John/Smith. This works fine, but if I add a trailing / , a few images on the site disappear, wheras a few don't. (They're all in the same location). However, the search results are fine.
2) Is it possible to make cerain querystrings optional? Server side, this is implemented (i.e. if nothing is entered, then assume a default value). But how would this work with the URL rewrite module? e.g. www.mysite.com/John would search for John and use a default value for the sName parameter.
I have the following JSON class I am intending to use to perform management calls on my database asynchronously:
<script type="text/javascript">
var CalendarManager = {
defaultOptions: {
staffcode: 0, // required
date: 0, // required
[Code]....
Basically, my question is: how do I specify optional parameters to a WebMethod when providing JSON data?
I know I can reduce the parameters down to just the required values, and then use HttpContext.Request.Params to read the values of optional paramaters, but I would have thought the way I have tried here should have worked.
EDIT
The XMLHttpRequest.responseText value for the error is:
Invalid JSON primitive: staffcode.
This is throwing me even more off the scent of the problem :(
I have a GridView bound to an DataSource query with parameters tied to form controls.What is the standard / best-practices way to handle optional query parameters?
View 3 RepliesI'm creating a webpage with serveral web controls to set search parameters for querying an SQL table. My plan is to use a TableAdapter to hold the query. If the user decides not to use one, several, or any of the web controls to filter their search, I want the SELECT to execute without complaining that it doesn't have parameter values. Should my SQL query look like
[Code]....
I have a data grid with a lot of information on it - to easily filter the data, I would like to be able to pass parameters to it. My problem is that I do not want the parameters to be required. So if I just put 1 or 2 of them in the query string, I would like for it to return all of the data related to those two parameters.I am using a data grid & stored procedures:My Stored Procedure looks like this:
[Code]...
I would like to create a route that looks something like this:
routes.Add(new Route("{*url}/{action}.do/{id}", new MvcRouteHandler())
Is this possible? It seems like the catchall has to be last?
In Area VIPUsers I have controller ProfileController and other controllers.
If I want every method in ProfileController to have parameter (id) and every method in other controllers to have parameter (userid and id) how would I map it?
Would it be
context.MapRoute("ProfileMapping", "VIPUsers/Profile/{action}/{id}",
new {controller="ManageUsers", id=""});
and then map a default one for all the controllers?
context.MapRoute("Default", "VIPUsers/{controller}/{action}/{userId}/{id}",
new {action="Index", userId="", id = ""});
If I go to a page on ProfileController and give it two parameters after {action} (VIPUsers/Profile/SomeAction/4/4/), it'd use the second mapped route. Is that correct?
I have a question. How do we define date output parameters for a stored procedure?
before you answer,I should mention that I am not referring to the sql syntax definition ,which is @mydate datetime output.
This is ok,what i am asking is HOW DO I SPECIFY IT IN LINQ WHEN I NEED TO CALL THE STORED PROCEDURE IN THE SERVER SIDE CODE. I am repeating that I do I am not referring to the sql definition .
In my stored procedure I have declared some parameters as NULL values(Optional Parameters).
In my C#.NET code I didn't use the parameters to pass values to Stored Procedure's NULL
Parameters. So I am getting Exception.
I don't want to pass parameters from my code.Because I have declared 30 parameters in my
Stored Procedure as NULL values.
Is there any other way to execute Stored Procedure from Front End without passing values to
Optional Parameters in SQL stored procedure?
I am using a third party service that does an async callback to a URL I provide to them. So I tell them to use [URL] This must obviously map to an Incoming() method on my StatusController.
However, what I don't have control over is the format of the parameters they call my URL with. E.g. They will do a callback such as: [URL] I want to map this to the parameters of my action method: Incoming(string param1, string param2, int param3)
How do I do this?
I trying to create routes for a resource with an array of homogeneous parameters.
URL would look like this:
products/category/{categoryId1}/{categoryId2}/.../brand/{brandID1}/{brandID2}/...
And would like an action method would look like this:
public ActionResult GetProducts(IList categoryID, ILIsts brandID)
{...}
where category and brand are independent filters.
I found a solution for similiar task:
[URL]
And wonder if there is no more beautiful solution that allow to use this prototype public ActionResult GetProducts(IList categoryID)
instead of public ActionResult myAction(string url)for action method to avoid splitting the string and casting?
[Code]....
here PublisherId is one parameter , i need to pass another parameter like Type in above line. I have tired but json fucntion wont call
Does outputcaching VaryByParams in webforms understand route parameters? Such that if I have a route similar to "Content/{filename}/{more}" that I could do VaryByParams="filename" and have it return cached results based on filename and ignore any values in the more?
View 1 RepliesI have a details page containing a form field named UserId. On the same page i have another search form with a field also named UserId.
I am using Html.LabelFor(vm > vm.UserId) and Html.TextBoxFor(sm > sm.UserId) on the two different view models, vm being the view model and sm being the search model. (Yes, the UserId property on the two models has identical names - because they are the same domain property.
When i navigate to the page, the populated UserId on the vm is inserted into BOTH form fields named UserId by MVC. Even the sm.UserId are empty.
That is my initial problem. There are a few ways ti avoid that. My solution was to use the Prefix flag for the sm.
[code]...
My problem is that MVC can't map the Search.UserId (because of the .) to fit the UserId (prefixed with Search) in the action shown above.
So it seems like MVC has a prefix-feature, that are actually nok fully supported through the Route-handler.
Ofcourse i could rename the Search.UserId to Search_UserId, but then the name dosent match the name MVC expects in the recieving action above. (expects Search.UserId) Renaming The UserId property of the search model would fix the issue, but since it is the same value in the domain, this seems like a workaround.
so I have a web programming assignment for university where I'm building a website that uses an Access database but I have hit a brick wall with something.I'm using parameterized queries to query my database. For one of my queries, I want to be able to take a bunch of parameters that are optional, and if they aren't needed I'll pass in a value of null and I'd like the part of the where clause relevant to them to evaluate to true. This is straightforward in most databases, from my understanding you could do something like to make param1 an optional parameter.
WHERE ((@param1 = ARandomColumnName) OR (@param1 = null))
However this can't be done using Access, as all parameters in a query are represented by a ?. Every ? is assumed to refer to a different parameter, so if you want to use a parameter more than one (like the above code I wrote does) then you'd have to pass it twice. This seems hacky to meSo what do I do? I have spent *hours* googling and banging my head on the desk. I'll cry if I missed something really obvious
[Code]....
When I want to get the output values its okay but I also want returning a table as a result data.But Datareader has no rows.is it possible if I want a returning query result and multiple output values togather ?I wrote a test above.I can get output values as sqlparameters. But Datareader attached to a Gridview is empty.can you detect whats wrong here and it doesnt return a query result.So stored procedure is not standart or ı am doing something wrong.this doesnt raise any exception.but not returning any data.
[code]....
Since ASP.NET MVC3 RC2 I encounter a bug when posting values to a controller method of which one of the parameter is a nullable int. Steps to reproduce:
I've created a test method
[code]....
In MVC3 RC1 this was working without any problems with the nullable int
Update:
I don't seem to have the problem with a newly created MVC3 website. What could I have in my project that influence model binding to nullable int's? And why would there be a difference between RC1 and RC2?