if I serialize C# automatic properties with soap serialization, generated xml contains ugly element namesfor City property it is <_x003C_City_x003E_k__BackingField id="ref-6">I know that it is because it doesn`t serialize property but generated variable that may have such name.
View 4 RepliesWe have created a class to wrap the payload of web service response with common information as follows.
public class ItemResponse<T> : Response
{
/// <summary>
[code]...
I follow the code snippet to calculate Session size. Profile Memory Usage of Session State ASP.Net My problem is some properties of objects aren't marked as Serializable so I cannot apply the solution. Can I just bypass non-serializable properties?
View 1 RepliesASP.Net 2.0 Web Services automatically create both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 bindings. Our web service, however, has SOAP extensions and custom exception handling that make the assumption that only the SOAP 1.1 binding is used (for example, the SOAP extension uses the HTTP SOAPAction header to control behavior).
I am looking to correct the code that makes these assumptions and make it work with either SOAP 1.1 or SOAP 1.2 properly. I am running into a bit of a problem in the generation of elements for our SOAP faults.
Consider the following web method implementation:
[Code]....
The SOAP 1.2 response now has the wrong qualified name for the detail element. It should be <soap:Detail>, but instead is merely <detail>, same as the SOAP 1.1 response.
It seems that the ASP.Net 2.0 framework has done quite a bit to transform a SOAPException into the appropriate form for the SOAP version, but neglected to properly handle the detail element. Additionally, they don't seem to have exposed the correct SOAP 1.2 qualified name for the detail element as was done with the SoapException.DetailElementName property.
So, what is the correct way to add a detail element to a SOAP fault response that works for both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2? Do I need to detect the SOAP version myself and hard-code the SOAP 1.2 qualified name for the detail element?
I have a c# v3.5 framework site that I am doing some maintenance on. I wish to use Automatic Properties but whenever I try to add one, the compiler fails [as below]. I have added the System.Core.dll (and it is in the web.config ok) but still no joy.
Error 6 'XXX.Archive.TypeOfArchive.get' must declare a body because it is not marked abstract or extern
I have a new VS2010 .NET 4.0 Web project and the Properties Folder has gone wierd on me. It has lost teh "Open" under the right click. There is no way to get a Settings file created now.
I am unable to get to the Settings grid and no Settings file is created. I tried the help and it has the normal trip of select Properties, Open (right click), Settings Tab, etc. etc.
I'm trying to store some business objects in a SQLProfileProvider Profile property, however my business objects use public properties, not fields. This means I can't serialize as binary (correct?) so I'm serializing as XML. I've got the basic XML.Serialization attributes on the business objects, basically just XMLRoot and XMLElements with Type properties and an XMLArray attribute for a collection<T>. When I look at the data in the aspnet_Profile table, sure enough, it looks like an XML representation of my BOs:
[Code]....
Additionally, it works fine while the user is logged in.However, if the user logs out and logs back in, the profile property is a new instance of the BO, not what was saved in the profile. What am I missing here?
is it possible to use WCF classes with attributes (like [DataMember....) then you wouldnt need to do seralization on the client side (jquery) ?
View 1 RepliesI am using business objects that are accessed via webservices. These objects can be loaded via the webservice and serialized to my mvc app. The mvc app can get a web reference to the objects and they can be utilized in the mvc app. However, the business objects are where the classes are defined, and where the annotations are applied.
The mvc validation seems to have no idea that there are System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations attributes applied to this business object class.
1) Are DataAnnotations lost when objects are serialized / deserialized?
2) If in mvc I use a view model approach, and have nested objects (which themselves have public properties - decorated with DataAnnotations) can/will the mvc validation system traverse the entire object model, the model being used for my view? (so it can see DataAnnotations attributes of the nested object)?
I'm trying some WCF ajax.net 3.5 out for the first time, and I'm having some difficulties. I have a WCF Service which I have connected to in my aspx page using <asp:ScriptManager>. I have a custom object which has been decorated as a [DataContract]. I'm calling the object from javascript successfully, I can see the JSON response in FireBug, but Sys.Serialization.JavaScriptSerializer.deserialize() chokes on it. I'm sure I'm making a noob mistake, but I used up all my patience getting the Web.Config values right for running the WCF service.
Here's a mockup of what I'm doing.
[Code]....
Why this WCF 3.5 method
[ServiceContract]
[AspNetCompatibilityRequirements(RequirementsMode = AspNetCompatibilityRequirementsMode.Allowed)]
public class Json
{
[OperationContract]
[WebGet(ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)]
public string Upper(string text)
{
return text.ToUpper();
}
}
returns {"d":"TEXT"} ?
It should returns {"TEXT"}
I'm calling using jQuery.
$("#upper").click(function() {
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "/Json.svc/Upper?text="+$("#input1").val(),
success: function(data) {
$("#input1").val(data.d);
}
});
});
Below is XML response from my vendor.
For Each i need <ns1:PricedItinerary> Node there exists a <formdata> node and i need to get that formdata node datas alone and append to my next request..
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<soapenv:Body>
<ns1:OTA_AirLowFareSearchRS Version="2.001" xmlns="http://www.opentravel.org/OTA/2003/05" xmlns:ns1="http://www.opentravel.org/OTA/2003/05">
<ns1:Success />
[Code] ....
I had an interview Thursday and one questions that I was asked in the technical interview was a little confusing.
First, he asked me about Viewstate and I explained to him what all that entailed.
He then asked me what happens if the data you are putting into the Viewstate gets to big.
I told him you could then use Sessions or start storing things in the Database.
He said, what about Data Compression? I immediately responded by saying, yes you can use Serialization/Deserialization to store/retrieve the data (i'm using that in my open source project).
When he says "Data Compression", is he talking about "Serialization" or is this something different?
Code:
public class GroupInfo
{
private List<Structure> _sectors = new List<Structure>();
[XmlElement("Sector")]
public List<Structure> Sectors
{ get; set; }
[XmlElement("Person")]
public List<Users> Person
{ get; set; }
[code]...
I want users to be able to export data as an XML file. Of course I want them to be able to later on import that same XML file however they always could change it or it could be a different XML file. So I want to validate the XML file to check if it is in the format that I expect. So I guess I would need something like a schema to check just that it has to be through code. So if I expect
<Root>
<Something>
<SomethingElse> </SomethingElse>
</Something>
</Root>
I don't want some other format to be in the file other then the one I expect. Also how would I validate fields? Like say I require that there must be some text in between tags. If it is blank the file is not valid. So how could I do this?
I decided to use XML serialization so I know it will through an exception if it is the wrong format and ignore stuff that does not work. However I am not sure should I just go through it and C# to validate each of the records or should I try to make an xml schema to do it. If I would want to do it through an xml schema with xml serialization how would that work? Like Do I first do something like I seen in the responses then de serialize it? Or how would I do it?
what is means of serialization mode in LINQ to SQL?
what architecture does LINQ to SQL uses internally (connected or disconnected architecture)?
I am having a lot of trouble with WCF web service over SSL / HTTPS, so I was wondering if (as a quick fix) I could serialize the object, convert that to a byte array, encrypt the array, pass the encrypted array.
On the other side receive the encrypted array, decrypt the array, convert from the array and then deserialize the object.
I'm attempting to serialize an object but I would like to exclude one of the objects inside it. I've tried [NonSerialized] and it is still attempting to serialize it when I call XmlSerialize on a Cart object.
[Serializable]
[XmlRoot("Cart")]
public class Cart : ICart
{
// Public Properties
[DefaultValue("")]
public string ID { set; get; }
[XmlIgnore()]
[NonSerialized]
public CartSerializer Serializer = new CartSerializer(this);
}
in Json.net we can rename the property with [JsonPropertyAttribute("")] ,
public class Foo
{
// how can I rename the Foo1 property name to F1?!
public string Foo1 { set; get; }
public string Foo2 { set; get; }
}
and in the web service code behind :
[WebMethod]
public List<Foo> GetFoos()
{
List<Foo> post = new List<Foo>
{
new Foo(),
new Foo(),
new Foo()
};
return post;
}
What is the purpose of the PropertySpecified pattern used by XML Serialization ?
View 1 RepliesI have a class that contains an enum property, and upon serializing the object using JavaScriptSerializer, my json result contains the integer value of the enumeration rather than its string "name". Is there a way to get the enum as a string in my json without having to create a custom JavaScriptConverter? Perhaps there's an attribute that I could decorate the enum definition, or object property, with?As an example:
enum Gender { Male, Female }
class Person
{
[code]...
I have code :
[Code]....
Is it right?
I have been thinking of ways to optimize the out of state storage of sessions within SQL server and a few I ran across are:
Disable session state on pages that do not require the session. Also, use read-only on pages that are not writing to the session.
In ASP.NET 4.0 use gzip compression option.
Try to keep the amount of data stored in the session to a minimum.
Right now, I have a single object (a class called SessionObject) stored in the session. The good news is, is that it is completely serializable.
Optimizing using protobuf-net An additional way I thought might be a good way to optimize the storage of sessions would be to use protocol buffers (protobuf-net) serialization/deserialization instead of the standard BinaryFormatter. I understand I could have all of my objects inherit ISerializable, but I'd like to not create DTO's or clutter up my Domain layer with serialize/deserialize logic.
Thing is, when my service is providing result of type string my client .aspx page is working fine and it gives reference in my code. But now I changed my service to provide custom data type and I can't see service reference in my code, intellisense doesn't offer it at all. What am I missing here? WCFTestClient.exe is giving good results but I can't create my own in VS 2008
View 1 RepliesMy WCF service working fine when my dataset table contain less no rows...
When the DataSet tables contains large data then it gives error like this..