Web Forms :: Get People In The Textbox Before The Deletion
Oct 19, 2010checkboxlist textbox from a data transfer,I want those people in the textbox before the deletion.
obviously...
The second update, not deletion textbox
checkboxlist textbox from a data transfer,I want those people in the textbox before the deletion.
obviously...
The second update, not deletion textbox
I have a question.aspx page that allows "guests" and "admin" to use. If guest access the page, it says Submit, if admin access it, it says "Approve" on the button control.
My question is, when guest accesses that page, I don't care about their credentials, but when admin accesses that page, I want them to log in first. And the Admin users are the ones that work in our company with the same domain and such. Anyone that access outside would be "guest".. how can I prompt people in the same network when they try to access that page? I need that AD credentials to do some programming in code behind.
I'm working with a ListView and I have a problem: When I click the delete button, I need to know before deletion takes, the index of the item, because I have to do something before this event happen
View 2 Repliesam using asp.net3.5,C#. I am using this script in codebehind when mycheckboc is checked,now i want to give delte confirmation when checkbox is unchecked. so i need to catch whether it returns true/false for deletion in codebehind,,according to that i follow my steps.
I have written like this
[Code]....
I need to display other msg,functionality when it is checked n I need to do other msg,functionality when it is unchecked,,
I need to call a codebehind funtion if the confirmation returns true.how can i do this?
confirm row deletion of a GridView?
<asp:GridView ID="GridViewproject" runat="server" CellPadding="4" ForeColor="#333333"
I'm trying to add the code, programmatically, to ask the user if they want to delete a record that is being displayed in a DetailsView control. It is called Tutorial 22: Adding Client-Side Confirmation when Deleting by Scott Mitchell. how it could be done in a DetailsView. Here's some of the ASPX code:
[Code]....
And here's what I've got for my DetailsView1_DataBound() event code:
[Code]....
I have an .NET 4.0 / C# web application that contains pages with GridView controls on them. There is an Entity Data Model and EntityDataSource objects that allow for CRUD operations against the database. My questions are the following.
How can I setup the delete command in the GridView to delete recursively, given my setup? In otherwords, how do I cause it to delete the record selected as well as any records related to it, and any records related to those, and so on? Also, how do I incorporate verification of deletion before deleting? What I would ultimately like is a 3-button window to pop up. "Delete", "Delete Recursively" and "Cancel" would appear. I'm also open to other suggestions for a better way to do this.
I have a bound datagridview with the associated tableadapter, dataset and bindingsource. A different component in our application can add or delete rows displayed by the datagridview. When this happens, the underlying database edits are correct. The problem is that the datagridview seems to lose track of the data.
Currently, when we receive the event that our data has changed we do the following.
this.DataSet.Offers.Clear();
this.TableAdapter.Fill(this.DataSet.Offers);
this.BindingSource.ResetBindings(false);
this.DataGridView.Refresh();
If our example had something like 5 items displayed in the grid and a row was deleted, the grid refreshes with 3 items shown. If we manually refresh our grid through a button calling the exact same code, it displays the correct results. Is this an asynchronous call? Should we be refreshing the grid in a different area?
Is it possible in my code behind,to remove one specific item from a dropdown box that is bound from a sqldatasource? I've tried, but can't figure this out.
View 3 RepliesThe following is a note from Professional ASP.NET MVC 2 by Scott Hanselman ++
You might ask — why did we go through the effort of creating a <form> within our Delete Confi rmation screen? Why not just use a standard hyperlink to link to an action method that does the actual delete operation? The reason is because we want to be careful to guard against Web-crawlers and search engines discovering our URLs and inadvertently causing data to be deleted when they follow the links. HTTP-GET-based URLs are considered safe for them to access/crawl, and they are supposed to not follow HTTP-POST ones. A good rule is to make sure that you always put destructive or data-modifying operations behind HTTP-POST requests.
If web-crawlers and search engine have no access to the page containing deletion button, is it safe to use a standard hyperlink to link to an action method doing the actual delete operation?
Whenever I write lines like this:
<%: Html.LabelFor(model => model.AccountName) %>
And save the file, some lines (some, not all of them, haven't figured out the logic behind this yet) will be converted to this:
<%: Html.LabelFor(model => model.AccountName)%>
I have an sql table in which i have two columns enq_no and enq_serial.
for a particular enq_no, enq_serial should get incremented by one starting from 1.
What is the best approach to achieve this?
another issue is that after deletion enq_serial should get decremented by one.
How can i get this?
Is after delete trigger could be a good option?
If so? how can i get this with after delete trigger?
I have a gridview which has bound fields and a template field for checkbox.I wrote a code for deletion of records as per checking checkboxes.My problem is
HtmlInputCheckBox chk;
foreach(GridViewRow dr in dgvdetails.Rows)
{
chk = (HtmlInputCheckBox)dr.FindControl("ch"); [code]...
I have a problem of putting captcha code on my website and am also a novice on this. i do not want bots to be sent to the website. I want to make sure that people verifying results are humans and not automated scripts.
View 6 RepliesHow to send group of sms and email to many people at the time of error occurs in my application (vb.net) so the everyone get alert...
View 1 RepliesI have a system in which users can enter records into a database via ajax. Each user may hold many values in the database, with different pageId and itemId values. Each user is identified by a GUID set to a cookie. The system needs to prevent the user from entering two pieces of data with the same pageId and itemId, so I've created a script to do two database updates:
Firstly, all records are deleted from the database where the memberGUID, pageId and itemId fields match (i.e. they've already added this item).
Secondly, the record is then recreated.
It all works brilliantly, except when the GUID value is passed into the delete statement, then I just get a caught exception.
So this works:
[Code]....
But this doesn't:
[Code]....
The weird thing is that because the GUID value is being saved in the second database call, it is definitely there and is definitely the right data type etc. Even if I hard-code it into the delete procedure it still causes the whole thing to fail.
why it's failing when I add the GUID parameter in the deletion process?
For a certain project I need to be able to send the contents of a webpage to people who enter their e-mail address somewhere. For this I've scoured the internet and came upon a couple of possible sollutions. The first would be to use a scraper which would just look up the webpage and then mail the html contents to someone. The problem with this is that internet html (and more importantly css) and mail html might be completely different things when you look at outlook. This also takes the entire masterpage with it, while I pretty much just want the inner content.
Second sollution was completely rebuilding the pages in my mail function, based on a few given parameters. Seeing as there's many different types of pages that need to be sent, this would take ages to do...
Last sollution I came upon was manually calling rendercontrol. This actually seemed like a viable way of doing this, but of course, things go wrong. The structure of the website is as follows: Masterpage includes default.aspx, default.aspx has a placeholder which gets filled with a control I manually load (loadcontrol(path)) based on what page I need. This control is the one I need. My way of trying to render this control to send through mail is the following: first, I create a page, then I'll load the user control and finally I use UC.RenderControl(writer)
This does give me the basic html lay-out, but it seems that the Page_Load isn't being called, causing none of my variables to actually be filled in. Is there any way I can cause the control to be rendered just as if it were rendered inside a page's lifecycle?
There is a Gridview(say with 5 rows) in my web page with Delete button inside it.
I want that when I delete any row( say I deleted 5, 2, 3, 1) and then when I try to delete the last remaining row i.e., 4 then it should not get deleted.I want that remaining any last row(can be any) in Grid should not get delete.How to achieve that?
how can we count how many people are seeing our page?and how how can we count active users?
View 12 RepliesWe're debating on the architecture of this university database project. We can't decide if we should relate the tables as -> "one person to many addresses" or "many persons to many addresses". We understand that there will be duplication of some data in the "one_to_many" schema. How bad would that be. "many to many" is obviously more normalized. Are there any trade offs for either setup? We expect there to be 100,000+ people.
View 1 RepliesIn every organization there will be mail access project. I want to know the sample application. Can u please tell me the sample application. I know how to send the mails from asp.net page, by using one email id. means by setting the mailer host, username and password details in web.config file. But i need to send from different email id's to different id's.
View 3 Repliesso theoretically, i have multiple companies using my application, and each company has multiple users. Now data is stored in a sql database and certain parts of it are changed enough whereby it has to be "reselected" by every user after a specific amount of time. ill call this the "highly dynamic data." (I already sorted out the 'users by company' effeciently with a cluster index in the companyID column for the tables)
lets say that each session will "check" if it has to be updated every 15 seconds. How will it check? If someone submitted a change to the "highly dynamic data" in the sql database then they will also submit the "time of change" to an .xml database. Moreover, each session has a "last updated" session variable. The session that submitted the change will update his "last updated" session variable at the time of the sql update. However, all other sessions will have out dated "last updated" session variables. and every 15 seconds each session checks the xml database to see if their "last update" is current. If it is not current then it does the sql database update, else, it does nothing..is this a good mechanism for efficient updating? The goal is to keep the sql database as free as possible and reduce strain on the server?
edit: oh yeah, how would i implement the timing factor here? firstly, i assume the 15 second counter shouldnt be concurrent with all other users, otherwise the server would be a cluster-f*** every 15 seconds so how would i incorporate some randomness for each session?
AD : Get All people objects for each OU returned
[Code]....
Our code is in SVN. We develop using Visual Studio and the AnkhSVN plugin.Having used VSS before SVN I was used to the idea of locking files so other users know not to edit it while you are (in fact I thought this was the main point of source control, to prevent lost data from these conflicts).I've been told this rarely happens and cases where you can't work because another dev is locking you out are more frequent (which sounds like a principle that might only apply to a certain subset of dev projects). But anyway, SVN is better and we're using it.
So when I do edit a file, and go to check it in, and find out the other user has edited it too, what do I actually do?Surely there's a better way than saving a copy of my file, reverting changes,updating it from server,then merging my changes back in with winmerge? When I right-click the file and click 'merge' I'm told I should update first, so that's obviously not what I need.Update: partial answer OK, it sounds like I just hit update,then SVN merges non-conflicting changes automatically,and should let AnkhSVN know about any conflicting changes to allow some kind of resolution.Does anyone know how this works in AnkhSVN - what I'd actually do?
(if not I'll try it myself, accept the current top answer and update this question with the second half for posterity).
How to Host the Web Application on IIS 7.0 so that 100 people can be accessed locally.
Request you to provide steps on how to go ahead with it.