I don't know if this has to do with how FindControl works or how scope works. But my base class is having a hard time seeing the fields of child classes. Currently I'm planning have the derived class set a property in the base class, but there are a lot of derived classes, so that isn't a very attractive solution.
[code]....
MSAJAX: overrides of toString() and other Object methods do not propagate to derived classes
View 1 RepliesI am trying to setup a base product class that will be inherited by a more specific class later. Here is my scenario. I have a table called ProductBase, it contains three fields, BaseProductId(PK), CatalogNum, and ListPrice. Every product in the system will share these attributes. Next, I have a table called Shirt, with three fields BaseProductId(PK, FK), Color, and Size.
I then setup an Entity Data Model that pulled in both of these tables, and created to classes BaseProduct and Shirt.
So, in my model, I want to do something like this:
[Code]....
The problem I have with this approach, is that I cannot force the properties for the Shirt. What if I make a change to the BaseProduct? What happens when I have multiple product types, will I have to repeat this code?
I got loads of website, that share one of two baseclasses. I need the two baseclasses to be able to share part of the same code. I dont want to have to duplicate the shared code per baseclass.
so.. I got a page.aspx that inherits the baseclass and that inhertis 'sub' baseclass that inherits the web.ui.page class. So far so good :-)
In my baseclass I got a Public (at the top of the class not in any method- not sure of the proper term) Varable that is constructed from a structure in the BO class.
it Public PageDetails AS CoreDomainSetupBO.GetStartUpDetails = {database method}
I need the pagedetails to be available in the sub baseclass but it cant be defined there as the page details value is defined differently in the different base classes.
I hope that makes sense, I need to sub base class to be able to use a property that is defined at baseclass level.
I have a BasePage class that all of my content pages inherit from. In my BasePage, I have many Import Statements. It seems as though they carry over into the derived class as one would expect. However, if you were to try and access code in the client aspx design page, as you would in the code-behind, you run into problems.
For instance, in my BasePage i have a Public Enum named ThemedSites. It's just an enumerator that lists the 5 different themes my site could be skinned as. I, at times, need to do different things in code, and in design, depending on what theme I'm currently in. I have a Public Property named CurrentSite (might have been more appropriate to say CurrentTheme, but that's besides the point). CurrentSite's return type is ThemedSites. So in code, one would say something like:
[Code]....
This works great in any page that inherits the BasePage class. This falters when that very same logic is used in the design page like:
[Code]....
Now, it works if you fully qualify both sides of the condition, but that's not my question. My question is: why isn't the Imported NameSpace in the BasePage recognized in the client-side server tag, as one would think it would be, according to how it IS recognized in the server-side code-behind?
I am new to LINQ. when we drag tables we get a dbml file and designer file.
For example DataClasses1.dbml and DataClasses1.designer.cs.
Once we have them then we can start using our LINQ Queries.
In my company project I do not see this designer files and instead there are .tt files which were used as templates to greate ABC.generated.cs files. Is this same as designer class?
I am following the Nerd Dinner tutorial as I'm learning ASP.NET MVC, and I am currently on Step 3: Building the Model. One part of this section discusses how to integrate validation and business rule logic with the model classes. All this makes perfect sense. However, in the case of this source code, the author only validates one class: Dinner.
What I am wondering is, say I have multiple classes that need validation (Dinner, Guest, etc). It doesn't seem smart to me to repeatedly write these two methods in the partial class:
[code]....
This doesn't "feel" right, but I wanted to check with SO to get opinions of individuals smarter than me on this. I also tested it out, and it seems that the partial keyword on the OnValidate method is causing problems (understandably so). This doesn't seem possible to fix (but I could very well be wrong).
I am having a problem mapping a many-to-one relationship from an abstract base class mapping to a concrete union-subclass. Example:
public abstract class Entity
{
public virtual Guid ID {get; set;}
public virtual string Name {get;set;}
public virtual User OwnerUser {get; set;}
}
public class User : Entity
{
public virtual string UserName {get; set;}
}
I have a base abstract class for all of my database objects. I am mapping these classes with the Entity class as the abstract mapping class and the User as a union-subclass. When creating the configuration object, no errors are thrown and the Schema exports just fine. However, the field to the OwnerUser just won't show up in the database for all of the concrete classes. Here is an example of how the mapping looks
<class entity-name="Entity" name="Entity" abstract="true">
<id name="ID" type="guid">
<generator class="guid.comb"/>
</id>
<property name="Name" />
<many-to-one name="OwnerUser" column="ID" entity-name="User" />........
I am also using an Oracle XE instance as the database backend. If this isn't enough information to properly answer the question, let me know and I will add what I can.
I am Confused about the TextReader Class,that how it fetched data ?And from where it fetches data?
Is this the base class of all other Reader type classes?
Can I use VB and C# classes together in the same asp.net 3.5 project?
View 3 RepliesDo we have to do something special to have ASP.NET partial classes aware of controls that are declared in our user control's base classes? The partial classes keep generating declarations for controls in the base class which mean the controls in the base class get hidden and are null.
View 1 RepliesI'm curious as to what people consider better practice, between duplicating model structure in the view model and using a mapping tool to move data between the two, or aggregate the model inside the view model, i.e. have a property on the view model class that is a reference to the actual model. Which is considered a better approach in general?
View 1 RepliesIn a recent post, I expressed a need to access the properties for the body using declarative syntax, see
Contentplaceholder for replacing attributes?
But, the syntax confuses the editor which is not acceptable.
My hypothesis for a workable solution is to make the change in code. To derive a class from System.Web.UI.Page with extended functionality. However, I want for the designer to be able to still use declarative syntax to set the body tag.
I do not want to have to change any code in my aspx web pages except that they derive from base I want to be able to set these properties using declarative syntax, merely by adding a tag in the derived page I'm not immediately sure how to go about doing this because it doesn't exactly fit the OOP paradigm and I'm not sure where the changes need to be made.
I can use a findcontrol in the base to see if the placeholder has been added. But, not sure exactly at what point in the page processing lifecycle that I can use this findcontrol. I need to set the body before it renders but also be able to grab something from the declarative code.
Is it possible for a derived controls to inherit his base control skin.
Say I am deriving a control from TextBox, is it possible for the derived control to inherit the skin settings for Textbox or do they need to be defined again?
I am applying the default skins to all controls through the styleSheetTheme Page property I am using the Devexpress asp.net controls if that makes any difference.
Since we can access the private data member of base class in the derived class with the help of friend function. How can we do the same in C# asp.net? I mean whats the alternative of friend function in C# asp.net
View 2 Replieshave code that's using session variables; it's both in the master page code behind and in the code behind of some aspx files. I wanted to put this code in a function that's in a different file but when I did that, the statement Session["VariableName"] became underlined in red on the word session. What am I missing?
View 1 RepliesI copied this sample class and posted it inside of a website in a folder called APP_Code. The page is called class1.vb.I donot understand Classes at all.How do I use this on a webpage (like the index.aspx page)?
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Imports System.Data
Imports System.Data.SqlClient[code]......
I found datetimepicker class in one project . i.e C# project , in this project he/she created one class named as datetimeextensions.cs.
so then he/she imported in to one view and used like this .
[Code]....
i added this class in to my project and i tried to import but it doesn't appear in extensions?
1) I'd like to make use of the built in membership system. Easy enough by itself. However, I wonder if I should still be building an entity around the User and Role classes since they aren't part of the custom database. As such, they aren't part of the domain's aggregate chains either.2) My entities contain the better part of my business logic. For example, my Category entity has the following method: AddForum(User user, Forum forum). All logic tests are performed there and applied, or not, to the private forums collection. What I am wondering about here is the appriateness of service classes. In the traditional mvc style, a service class operates between the controller and repository to perform business logic. With domain design, we do it in the entities. Should I still be using these, now superfluous service classes? Or should I save them for when something is really needed that isn't part of the domain itself, such as an EmailService
View 2 RepliesI'm using Entity Framework to create my data objects. Here's what my designer.cs file looks like:
[code]....
But my validations aren't loaded. If I try to submit the form with no value for Name, I get an error message saying The value '' is invalid. instead of my error message.
I'm implementing n-tier structure in the current app I'm working on. Because DataBinding a list of my Objects to a Repeater was far too slow I need to databind a DataTable to the Repeater. Should I still DataBind to a Function (that returns a DataTable) in the BLL that calls a Function in the DAL that returns a DataTable?
View 2 RepliesI'm trying to learn ASP.NET programming and here's my first big issue I need to solve:- I like to keep code separate from presentation so I've decided to use code-behing model - I've created default.aspx + default.aspx.cs and everything works nicely- Inside default.aspx.cs, in
[Code]....
I want to instantiate an object where its class is declared in a separate file and is part of a separate namespace. This is a simple PDF generation class that I wish to develop and use in other web and also desktop projects, that's why all these separation.- As a web developer I tend to avoid all kind of IDEs, as a result of this I am independant and I know every line of code in details. Do you think it is possible to bypass VisualStudio and code all the projects by hand? I believe this is quite possible with pure C# code but what about the problem I've described above? Can somebody please write the minimum directive(s) to include an external class or file. (I know about VS 'Add class...', etc. )
In ASP.NET I have a form that has a Textbox named txtOutput and a button. In the main file.aspx.vb I can call a function from the button handler and in that function I can have
txtOutput.Text = "Some Message"
with no problem. I have a bunch of functions in several other classes. For instance I have a class named AbleCommerce that does some database functions. These functions are called from my main class. In those functions, however, I have no visibility of txtOutput. All of my classes are, unfortunately, in the default namespace which I understand is not optimal but didn't seem to impact this issue.
I know this is an easy one I've just not understood properly but it has me stumped. My gut says that I probably need to pass the Textbox object to my "other class" but can't for the life of me figure how.
i am wondering if i got a label that works out a price in default.aspx and then i want to show it on an invoice Invoice.aspx with Button.Attributes.add("onclick","popup(this)"); with java popup to show my invoice on button click how i am gonna get that label that works out the price to invoice.aspx?
here is my code sample,
[code]....
I am working on a class library using C#. I have designed 3 main classes to model our data. They are designed such that class A contains a list of class B instances, and class B contains a reference to a class C instance, ie:
[code]....
I feel like the class design works well for modeling the data and our business rules, but it does create a few limitations like the above situation. I liked the separation of the PolicyTerm and Billing for the ability to allow that code to be modified and tested independently. Also, I feel like it keeps each section smaller and simpler.