C# - Is Normal To Push Data Into The Stream Before Click "Save"

I'm making tests with ASP.NET HttpHandler for download a file writting directly on the response stream, and I'm not pretty sure about the way I'm doing it. This is a example method, in the future the file could be stored in a BLOB in the database:

public void GetFile(HttpResponse response)
{
String fileName = "example.iso";
response.ClearHeaders();
response.ClearContent();
response.ContentType = "application/octet-stream";
response.AppendHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=" + fileName);
using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(Path.Combine(HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data"), fileName), FileMode.Open))
{
Byte[] buffer = new Byte[4096];
Int32 readed = 0;
while ((readed = fs.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
{
response.OutputStream.Write(buffer, 0, readed);
response.Flush();
}
}
}

When I open the url with the browser, appears the "Save File" dialog... but it seems like the server has started already to push data into the stream before I click "Save", is that normal? If I remove the line"response.Flush()", when I open the url with the browser, ... I see how the web server is pushing data but the "Save File" dialog doesn't come up, (or at least not in a reasonable time fashion) why?

When I open the url with a WebRequest object, I see that the HttpResponse.ContentLength is "-1", although I can read the stream and get the file. What is the meaning of -1? When is HttpResponse.ContentLength going to show the length of the response? For example, I have a method that retrieves a big xml compresed with deflate as a binary stream, but in that case... when I access it with a WebRequest, in the HttpResponse I can actually see the ContentLength with the length of the stream, why? What is the optimal length for the Byte[] array that I use as buffer for optimal performance in a web server? I've read that is between 4K and 8K... but which factors should I consider to make the correct decision. Does this method bloat the IIS or client memory usage? or is it actually buffering the transference correctly?