In Asp.net Web forms why must a user control be partial? I tried to remove the partial keyword and it says: Missing partial modifier on declaration of type 'test'; another partial declaration of this type exists
Where is the other declaration?I am trying to pass a generic type with the user control how can I do that? I can't unless I change the other declaration too. I couldn't find it so I removed the partial keyword.Note:
you do have 3 files if your making WebApplication but if your making website you only get 2 files?
UserControl.ascx
UserControl.ascx.cs
so in website where is the other declaration?the reason i want generic is because im making a Grid User Control so i want to pass the type the datasource is going to have.
I have a class constructor which accepts a Listbox.
[Code]....
I need to be able to pass another control type and execute the exact same logic in one of the methods... Seems like a use for Generics... I'm not so sure about the syntax... The type of control that I will pass is a rad combo box which has many of the same properties of the listBox control. However, RadComboBox does not inherit from listBox or dropDown so I am unable to cast. When changing the signature of the constructor to As RadComboBox as well as the property and field the method works as expected. I am trying to avoid duplicating code here.
However, when I try to build the control I'm getting the error as shown in the subject. I've tried searching, and it seems the signature for the original function matches the one I have, and all other solutions I've seen uses the same signature.
Now i can populate my gridview trough code by this: //gvwDiensten.DataSource = new BindingList<diensten>(dataManager.GetList<diensten>().ToList());But i would like to use an objectdatasource, so i created this:
[Code]....
</asp:ObjectDataSource>
But when running the page i get:
ObjectDataSource 'dsDiensten' could not find a non-generic method 'GetList' that has no parameters.
I'm trying to create a validation layer that will contain methods to validate all my objects (in my Business Objects layer) .. but when I try to reference both the validation and business objects to each other I get a circular dependency error .. so I've decided to create a new layer (BLL) to validate the objects for me and I'll be able to reference both the validation and the object layers.
so I want to build some kind of class/interface -I don't know what fits more- to be like a generic type or a parent type that my method could accept it as a parameter and check for it's Name/ID property. Instead of defining a new method overload for each object type I have Simplification
I have a user control which has a Gridview and a listview, I want to make this control generic so that I can just pass the type of the class I want to edit, which would be a linq entity, and then it would automatically do the rest, so far I havent had any success and I was wondering if anybody knows a tutorial or some info about doing this?
Is there a generic control that can be added to all aspx pages that checks for silverlight plugin and the version.. I know there is javascript and the silverlighthost object tag that accomplishes this. Is there an existing ascx control that wraps this functionality ? I need to be able to set the path to the xap on each page (via a property on the ascx control).
if I use a Html.Hidden field in my view, when the value click to submit the form I would like to pass this data to the controller. This variable would contain int as key and string as value,
Dictionary<int, string> interestTable = new Dictionary<int, string>();
How can I specify the htmlAttribute fo this variable in my Html.Hidden code?
I am trying to set property value using reflection as below. I wanted to know if there is any generic way of finding the property type instead of doing it int he below way.
I have a class Trans, with properties siteID and TID. I have a generic list of this class, TransList = list(Of Trans).
Now I want to find the Trans in TransList where the siteID is 3 and the TID is T1. There will only be one record. I want to then update this Trans in the TransList (so I need a reference to the Trans). I am trying to do the following, but it doesnt like it.
I'm busy writing a handler to serve various documents for download or presentation in web forms pages. The documents range from various image formats, to PDF, to MS Office documents, to generic binaries. My basic draft of the download process is as below:
[code]....
However, I have some misgivings about lumping all documents together as application/octet-stream, and I would prefer, if feasible, to use a more specific content type per document type. I have a DB table for document types where I could store this. Am I going in the right direction, and if so, where can I find a suitable starting list of content types for document types?
I'm writing a formbuilder for our CMS which dynamically loads bespoke controls into panels within a repeater.
The bespoke controls all inherit from, lets say 5arx.FormBuilder.FormControl, a base class which defines abstract methods for initialising, validating, repopulating, gathering submitted data from them. Controls range from simple text fields to complex, composite client-side controls.
It all works very well, but I've noticed something I feel is anomalous. During the course of writing code to retrieve form controls. gather their data and persist it to my database I noticed that their type reverts to the way objects get typed if you write your code in the (v. irritating) VS 'website project' mode.
So, for example a control that is defined as living in a namespace and being of type
Getting the BaseType property will correctly retrieve the underlying class, but it is perplexing to me why this should be happening. Particularly as I spent much of the summer refactoring our app from its original form as VS Website project (complete with shared code in the App_Code folder and other nastiness) to the (IHMO) correct web application project + supporting claass libraries so that we would have control over our namespaces and not get everything compiled into the ASP.x namespace
EDIT: Modified the (hypothetical) example root namespace.
Is there a way to instantiate and use a usercontrol (.ascx) if given you have its Type (ie. typeof(MyUserControl))?With regular asp.net controls like a textbox or a dropdownlist you can just make a new instance and add it to a controls collection. This doesnt appear to work for User controls. While you can make a new instance and add it to a collection, and have all of its events fire, it will not actually render to the page. Typically you would call Page.LoadControl() with the path to the .ascxThis presents a problem if all you have is its type. How can you get the path to the .ascx to give to the LoadControl method. Ideally I would also like to not have to have a reference to the Page object
i am trying to make a pop-up messsage box, using popupControlExtender. Such extender will be inside a web user control but the target control will be outside the user control instead. Could anyone tell me how i can do it ?
I have one User Control ,which is added in to another user control.My First User control define propwerty to populate user control.It working fine if used in page.But now i have problem ,i have to add this control in to another user control. i have added that as we do to add user control ,but am not able to pass the value to that first control from my page.
I am using the below example code and have a problem where I can't pass the Request.RawUrl value into an object that extends the Control object (class Test below).When I use the line:
the string value "<%= Request.RawUrl %>" is passed to the Target property.I need to get the value of Request.RawUrl passed to the Target Property of my Test control object. Does anyone have any ideas where I am going wrong?Control:
I have several custom classes that derive from a common base class so they share several members in common. I would like to be able to pass objecs from any of these three classes to a function that will "look at" common properties. However, it seems there is a catch 22 -- When I try to access a member (.FirstName) of the passed object, the computer reports an error that it thinks the member doesn't exist.
It seems to be a sort of contradiction -- since I didn't declare the type, the computer can't confirm existence, but it seems that it should have to take it on faith since the generic character of the type is specified by the code. Possibly there is something I don't know about that would fix this. I'm showing VB code for what I have so far. I went ahead and hardcoded an instance to confirm that the object exists and has the needed property. I commented out the line that had the code that resulted in the computer reporting an error.
Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable' to 'hcgames.ObjectClasses.ShoppingCart.ShoppingCartCartAddon'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)
From this query
ShoppingCartItems items = Cart.GetAllItems(); ShoppingCartCartAddons addons = Cart.GetAllAddons(); var stuff = from x in items select new ShoppingCartItem() { ProductID = x.ProductID, Quantity = x.Quantity, Name = x.Name, Price = x.Price, Weight = x.Weight, Addons = (from y in addons where y.ShoppingCartItemID == x.ID select y) };
Basically I want to call a user control from a master page. However, I need to pass an object (a List of objects to be more specific), to the user control. I'm generating the list of objects in the Page_Load of the master page. Here's the line in my master page that calls the user control.
This user control has a parameter called CalendarItems that accepts the list of items. However, if I try to set this inside of the Page_Load method, my control executes before the Page_Load and throws an exception saying CalendarItems is null. Is there any way around this?
EDIT: I have a drop down list on this page that determines what the list of CalendarItems is so when I populate the CalendarItems list I need to be able to read the selected value from the drop down list.
