I have a .swf file embedded in my asp.net webpage. It is slow to load although the size of the file is 1.60 mb. What might be the reason for the slowness? Is there a way I can speed it up in asp.net?
View 1 Replies
When we include Javascript files in our aspx files. either we write all the Javascript code in the Head section of aspx or we link to an external Javascript file.
So when the clinet makes a call to that page. Does that mean that all the Javascript will be loaded on the client side?
If that is the case then does not that mean that it will slow down the loading of page as all the Javascript has to be loaded on the client machine?
I know this is a bit like how long is a piece of string question, but I'm wondering how big some peoples ASP.NET Temporary Files folder, gets. I wish to move this folder to a RAM DISK so I'm trying to see how big this should be set, to.
eg. <compilation tempDirectory="R:ASP.Net Temporary Folder" debug="false">
This is only for my DEVELOPMENT Machine (to help speed up compiling -> temp crap goes to ram instead of the Disk).
Is 256MB big enough? What about file uploading? where do those files (temporarily) go?
when I load the web page the image's file size stays the same rather then reduce.
[Code]....
When I initially created my SQL Express 2008 database I vastly over-estimated the size of my database files. The problem is that now I have the correct field sizes and data actually in the database it does not require the max file sizes and growth that I had originally set.
This is a problem as I have a max database size of 500Mb with my web hosting provider and it appears that my database now has too large a footprint. This is after I have used the shrink database command in SQL Server Management and shrunk the database to a size of 6Mb so I can only presume that the problem lies with the fact that my original file size / growth settings are taking my database size to well over the 500Mb threshold I am permitted.
Is there anyway for me to change the max file size and growth options of my database without having to recreate the database from scratch?
My requirement is to get the file size in client side. there is no problem in FF but in IE you can't do that unless u r using an activeX object. So we thought of putting it in browser cache and reading the file size from there and when we post it to the server we will be taking it from the cache and send it to the server.
View 4 RepliesHow can I load an embedded resource as an ITemplate? The LoadTemplate() method only takes a string virtual path, and obviously this will not work for embedded resources.
View 2 RepliesDoes precompilation have any effect on XML files? i.e. can I obscure/protect xml files using precompilation? I assume that it has no effect as they aren't code.
If I use XML files as Embedded Resources, they appear in the DLL in a text editor as normal text. If the dll is edited and saved using a text editor, will it still work if it is unsigned?
I have a async file upload control and I am doing client side validation for Image."OnClientuploadstarted" I am doing the client side validation.My validation is working fine but my problem is that the file upload control text box goes green (i.e file is loaded on the server) even if the validation fails which is I dont want.What I want is when the client side validation fails the file does not gets loaded on the server and the Async file upload textbox does not goes green.I have goggled but have not found a suitable solution.
View 4 RepliesI'm writing a simple web site using codebehind for each page, however using the "codefile" directive, not "codebehind" as such, because I'm not precompiling. I'm just using a text editor to edit the aspx and codebehind files. Problem is, every time I make a change to the code or the aspx file, and refresh the page in the browser, it takes a 2 or 3 seconds to come up the first time, like it's doing an on-demand initial compile. I assume that's what it's doing, as after the initial load, the page refreshes without any delay at all.
This behaviour is quite frustrating when making small changes to the html or code. I'm coming from classic ASP, where you could edit-refresh-edit-refresh etc. all day without your "stride" being broken by waiting for a "compile", you know? So I'd love to know if there's a setting which prevents this initial delay. When I want to deploy, I can do a compile or something, but while making lots of small edits, I just need the page to run without that initial delay.
I've developed a web page Client.aspx that is used for editing a client. This application has been deployed and I made sure that debug='false'.Upon selecting a client from the dropdownlist, his/her information is retrieved for editing. This retrieving process is very slow( about 9 seconds).Except this DropDownList, all the other controls on this page are within the Update Panel. There are 2-3 other Update Panels within the main Update Panel.
When a client is selected from the DropDownList, the Client_ID (DataValueField) is used to retrive the informationSELECT * FROM CLIENTS WHERE Client_ID=1576
This method returns a dataset.In the calling method I'm assigning these values to the respective fields.Some JavaScript is used for validating Phone#.I also have a RadioButtonList on this page. When one of the ListItem is selected I need to disable a TextBox. Even this process is taking much time than expected.
So i'm new to AJAX and just installed the AJAX toolkit.
When i have tried to used any of the object there my page are really slow, it like the server is forever to compile the site and when that is done the browser shows it in a flash.
You can see here :
[URL]
This is not a problem when using only ASP.NET.
When i debug in VS2008 i can see that is looking for some random files when compiling like C:AjaxBuildAjaxServerAjaxControlToolkitToolkitScriptManagerToolkitScriptManager.cs and alot of other stuff, it goes through alot of setting there and i think that is the hold up, why it's so slow.
I have Sp1 installed, running Windows 7 64bit.
These pages are very small and standard. I basicly drag a toolkitscriptmanager, htmleditor, textbox and two buttons to the form. There isnt more.
This is the code for the first page :
[Code]....
The host has AJAX support and has installed SP1 for .NET.
I have a situation where I need to have close to 30 drop down lists on one form. The user also wants the autocomplete functionality. I decided to use the ASP.NET AJAX control. So that the page will load faster I hide them until they are needed. But, as more and more become visible the postback time is getting longer and longer.
I know this can be fixed, but I'm not sure how. Can anyone give me any advice, point me to some articles? Do you have a suggestion for another method of doing what I need? Maybe, I shouldn't even be using ComboBoxes for this?
my page contain a dropdownlist which binding many list of data with no categories. While refresh in one update panel is very slow.
View 4 RepliesEvery now and then (always after a long period of idle-time, e.g. overnight) when I access a site built using asp.net - it takes around 15 seconds to load the page (15 seconds before I see any progress whatsoever, then the page comes up fast).Further pages on that site, or refreshes, are quick as usual - they are also fast on other machines, only the first one seems to take the 'hit'.
Page tracing never through anything up (whole cycle was a fraction of a second) So my question is where else should I be looking? Perhaps IIS? Or could it still be my asp.net app and I'm just looking in the wrong place (the trace) for clues?As I don't have much control over the IIS server, anything I can check through asp.net would be more helpful, before I go ask that particular admin.
The first time that my page loads (this is after it has been deployed), it is terribly slow.
My guess is that it is still compiling dynamically, and not precompiling.When I publish through VS2008 I have "Allow this precompiled site to be updatable" unchecked and "Use fixed naming and single page assemblies" checked.Could I be missing something in my web.config file?
I can post the URL of the site if you would like to view it, but it takes 10+ seconds to load upon first visiting, and then less than 1 second to navigate the site.
I have a simple web application that loads very slow the very first time after i deploy it. I am using ASP.NET 3.5 SP1 / VS 2008 / Linq / Web forms to load the default.aspx home page. It is a very light page with nothing too fancy.Now to debug this load issue, I logged all the events in the global file and got the following log text:
2010-04-10 11:58:38,083 - Application_Start
2010-04-10 11:58:38,111 - Application_BeginRequest
2010-04-10 11:58:38,117 - Application_AuthenticateRequest
2010-04-10 11:58:52,321 - Session_Start
2010-04-10 11:58:52,454 - Page_Load
2010-04-10 11:58:53,951 - End Page_load
2010-04-10 11:58:53,981 - Application_EndRequest
Now my question is, between the Application_AuthenticateRequest and Session_Start functions, there is generally around 10 - 15 seconds - which i believe seems to be the problem.The thing, I am unsure why this is slow between these two functions.I am not using any forms authentication.Also, I am not doing anything fancy in the global file besides setting a session variable.
I am using some webrefernces for reporting services. The first time they load they are really really slow. Is there any way to reference the files locally?
View 2 RepliesI often Observed that pages developed in simple asp is being load most speedy then pages developed in asp.net ,
View 5 RepliesI have a MVC view using the following VM.
[Code]....
Currently the page load slow. I am thinking of using JQuery load and render List<A> and List<B> separately and asynchronously. Can I still use MVVM pattern? Or I had to create to controller methods returning List<A> and List<B> separately?]
We have an asp.net website running on IIS 6 Windows 2003. When ever we upload a class file to the App_Code folder our whole site goes down temporarily until, what I assume, compilation is complete. Has anyone else experienced this? Any other file we upload it does not do this only our class files.
View 1 RepliesWhenever I use ASP.NET AJAX it's calling Resource.asx files many times and it's affecting site performance. How can we avoid that?
View 3 RepliesI have an asp.net web page to serve large file downloads to users.
The page is hosted on IIS7, Windows Server 2008.
The strange thing is that users can download at good speeds (2MB/s) when I don't add a content-length response header but as soon as I add this header, download speed drops to somewhere around 35kbps/s.
This is the code:
[code]...
Of course I can leave the content-length out but the user will not know how big the file is and how long the download will take...which is annoying.
Over the last week I've been investigating an issue for one of our clients whereby the initial page load following a deployment of their website takes around 1 minute, resulting in unacceptable downtime for end users. This was happening not only for code deplyments (bin dll's and .config files) but also if there were large numbers of .aspx pages updated. For code deployments it's not an issue, but for aspx updates it is; in this particular scenario, we are making use of a 3rd party content management system (RedDot from OpenText) in which every page of the site is published out as a distinct .aspx page. This means that for this website there's somewhere in the region of 2,400 separate .aspx pages. I realise this isn't an ideal situation but we're working within the constraints of the CMS, and we managed to correlate the instances where the site was unresponsive with App pool restarts, which also corresponded to publications of of .aspx pages.
I found an article by Tess Ferandez [URL] which describes all the reasons why the app pool may restart, and it does seem that if more than 15 .aspx pages are changed then the app pool will recycle and the pages will be re-compiled. Another msdn article [URL] then gave me a few pointers on how to start addressing this problem, and for the moment I've set a flag on the compilation options to prevent batch compilation:
<compilation batch="false">
This means that the initial page load now takes around 6 seconds instead of 1 minute, which is a great improvement. However, I also used the "Compilations Total" performance counter to investigate the number of pages that have been compiled by ASP.NET for my site and was quite surprised that the total number of pages that get compiled peaks at 44, which is odd given that there are 2,400 aspx pages in the site. If the batch flag is set to false, the counter slowly increments by 1 page at a time as you click around on the site; if batch mode is true, the initial compilation takes the number straight to 44 over the course of ~60 seconds. What I'm really struggling to understand is why all 2,400 pages aren't compiled. Does anyone have any inside info on what might be going on as all the documentation I've read seems to indicate that all of the pages should be compiled and this counter should be much higher.
I have used [URL]....
above method to save and retreve files from sql server database. I have uploaded around 50-60 images as jpg. But it taking so much time to get display online. but it's working faster when accessing from local database.
There's the page where images are displaying [URL]....
Is the speed for images retreiving from sql database is slower as compared to retrieving images from folder..?
.vb code:
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
If Not Page.IsPostBack Then
scroll = fillbannerpics()
End If
End Sub
[CODE]..
