I need to get notified about asynchronous requests in ASP.NET. I used the jQuery .ajaxSend global event but it does not trigger when using UpdatePanels.
Is there a multi-browser way to detect when a request is being made on a page?
i'm trying to intercept ajax requests with jquery, to display a waiting message like with using plugin BlockUI, but how can i intercept requests sended by the UpdatePanel provided from asp.net framework, is some way to take the trigger?
View 2 RepliesI have installed an HttpModule into my web app that will handle all requests with a given file extension.
I want ASP.NET to handle all requests with the extension, regardless of whether there is an underlying file on disk. So, when I added the extension to the 'Application Extension Mappings', I unchecked the 'Verify that file exists' checkbox.
However, this just transfers the file check to ASP.NET rather IIS, so I just get a different error page when requesting URLs with the file extension.
Is there a way to preempt this ASP.NET file checking and intercept the requests?
I have a aspx page to do asynchronous calls. The page gets data from the database(spends 30 seconds in the stored procedure) and then returns the results to the client. This is done through a jquery post.
The problem is that while it does the stored procedure for 30 seconds, the rest of my site can't make any requests.
I have <%@ Page Async="true" AsyncTimeout="600" Language="C#"... in the .aspx
My .aspx.cs contains:
[code]....
Javascript code:
$.ajaxSetup({
async: true
});[code]...
ASP.NET code on the logsomething page on the server:
Thread.Sleep(10000);
When I click a link I have to wait for a response from the server. In this case I have to wait 10 seconds before I am forwarded to the page I requested.Is it possible to prevent this?
I have a CRUD type page, where the user can modify an object
This page also has a JQuery Treeview (Async) , id like update part of the page depending on what the user clicks on the tree
Because its async, any postback will cause the tree to collapse - so ill like to have the ability to update the page partially
I have been moving my application to be more AJAX-based. Currently I have a web service call where I use jQuery to gather some textbox (string) and checkbox (boolean) results and pass it to a web service. Everything works really well, the response time is super quick. The only downside that I can see to this is
1) you need to use jQuery, which will add to the user's download time - this doesn't really affect my application too much because I am using jQuery throughout the site
2) users can see the code and potentially try to hack the web service because they know where it is
I am most concerned with #2. I've been reading a lot about .NET web service calls, using IAsyncResult,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2e08f6yc.aspx, and I am beginning to understand the 4 methods available in this article. However, is there extra bloat using this way compared to the jQuery web service call?If there isn't that much bloat or lag time using this method, I'd like to convert my application. Which one of these 4 methods is best in a scenario where I am just returning a small string value? The 4 methods in the article are to wait for EndInvoke itself, which from what I read is not recommended because this may block the first thread; and this should not be used on a service that affects the UI.Create a WaitHandle to wait for the 'OK' before EndInvoke is called Poll the IAsyncResult for .IsCompleted, using sleep() and a Do While until IAsyncResult.IsCompleted is true, then call EndInvoke Pass a delegate function to BeginInvoke to be called once the operation is complete.
I defined two webservices calls in ASP.NET:
1.BeginLengthyProcedure and EndLengthyProcedure (Asynchronous web method)
2.LengthProcedureSync
namespace ServiceDemo
{
[WebService(Namespace = "http://tempuri.org/")]
[WebServiceBinding(ConformsTo = WsiProfiles.BasicProfile1_1)]
[System.ComponentModel.ToolboxItem(false)]
[System.Web.Script.Services.ScriptService]
public class AsyncWebService : System.Web.Services.WebService
{
public delegate string LengthyProcedureAsyncStub(int milliseconds);......
This is a followup question to the one here
Here's briefly what I am trying to do. The File server creates a text file to indicate an end of the process. On a webpage on the Web Server, I loop every x seconds and make an ajax request to find out if the test file exists (ajax request to [URL]
I've tried the following approaches so far:
Trigger a web method from the client side that creates a HttpContext object to verify if the text file exists. But this is too strenous on the server and I started getting all kinds of exceptions in the Event Viewer.
i find a lot of websites that have some parts in the page that uses ajax much more faster than i used to see ajax requests
like changing views using tabs when i click a tab it changes content very fast than i used to in my web applications using Asp.Net and Ajax Control Toolkit
and also a very quick paging in repeaters or grids than i ever developed in my web apps
like this website [URL]
so i need to know which technology used to achieve this this website is developed using .net
but i need to know is this needs another technology to learn (from where can i learn it)
or is it just asp.net + ajax or whth other technology is it MVC
also i want to know if MVC is better than asp.net + ajax in concern with performance
I added a new asmx file, which start like this:
[Code]....
I have uncommented the ScriptService line to allow access from scripts.
What else do I need to set to make jquery connections?
Can I prevent access from outside my app? I only want to provide a service for signed-in users (web forms) via own webpage.
When I was reading the blog Using jQuery to Consume ASP.NET JSON Web Services
I have seen this argument:
"By using jQuery to call the web service directly, we've eliminated over 100 KB of JavaScript and three extra HTTP requests. "
Why does the ASP.NET AJAX call to a .NET Web-Service needs 3 extra HTTP requests? What are those requests? (I wonder how jQuery manages the call with lesser HTTP requests in this case).
Yesterday I upgraded to MVC 2 RC. I have several jquery ajax requests that worked fine prior to the upgrade. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.
I know the MVC team made changes to the framework to protect against Json Hijacking so that GET requests are not allowed (by default) and I have changed my jquery ajax code to use 'type: "POST",' and then adorned the Action Method with the POST verb.
Again, the odd thing about this is that it works sometimes and other times it doesn't. When it fails, there are no error details. The error code is 12030 or 12031.
What's the simplest and most effective way to selectively redirect HTTP requests to your ASP.NET page to its HTTPS equivalent? For example, if my page site URL is [URL], I want to redirect some (or all) page requests to [URL] What's the easiest way to do that?
View 2 Repliesany modal popup controls whereas I can interact with the controls, causing callbacks and asynchronous calls without losing the popup.
I tried with the modalpopupextender, but the popup will disappear with the call and re-rendering the popup like many people will cause massive flashes of the popup which i want to try and avoid.
I want to intercept any postbacks in the current page BEFORE it occurs . I want to do some custom manipulation before a postback is served. how to do that?
View 5 RepliesI have a control used in our CMS and we don't have the source code for it, what I would like to do is change the rendered output of this control.
Now, I could have a check in my base Page class that checks if the control is being used on the page and then change the html that needs to be altered, but that seems a bit excessive for just 1 usage.
So is there any other way of changing the behaviour of the control without the source code? I'm thinking not other than the way described above.
I am implementing HttpModule for compressing request.Below is the codee for HttpModule:
public class Global : IHttpModule
{
public void Init(HttpApplication app)
{[code]....
It's able to intercept and compress js and css in the development web server but when i run it from IIS 5.1 it is not able to compress js and css files.
I would like to generate a 401 page if the user does not have the right permission.
The user requests a url and is redirected to the login page (I have deny all anonymous in web.config). The user logs in successfully and is redirected to the original url. However, upon permission check, it is determined that the user does not have the required permission, so I would like to generate a 401. But Forms Authentication always handles 401 and redirects the user to the login page.
To me, this isn't correct. The user has already authenticated, the user just does not have the proper authorization.
In other scenarios, such as in ajax or REST service scenario, I definitely do not want the login page - I need the proper 401 page.
So far, I've tried custom Authorize filter to return ViewResult with 401 but didn't work. I then tried a normal Action Filter, overriding OnActionExecuting, which did not work either.
What I was able to do is handle an event in global.asax, PostRequestHandlerExecute, and check for the permission then write out directly to response:
if (permissionDenied)
{
Context.Response.StatusCode = 401;
Context.Response.Clear();
Context.Response.Write("Permission Denied");
Context.Response.Flush();
[code]....
First of all, I'm not even sure if that is the right event or the place in the pipeline to do that.
Second, I want the 401 page to have a little more content. Preferably, it should be an aspx page with possibly the same master page as the rest of the site. That way, anyone browsing the site can see that the permission is denied but with the same look and feel, etc. but the ajax or service user will get the proper status code to act on.
I am working on a tool which audits access to existing web application. Existing app does not have any hooks in place, but my plan is to inject an IHttpModule by modifying web.config and log whatever I need to log during EndRequest event.
What I'm struggling with right now is: I cannot intercept what is application writing to an output stream. I need to know what output does the application send to the client. Originally, I hoped I could run a code in BeginRequest to replace HttpContext.Response.OutputStream with a stream of my own, which would be flushed to original stream during EndRequest, but the stream only has a get accessor, so I cannot replace it.
I could of course use reflection to assign to private member of HttpContext.
n my A.aspx, I will call web method GetName in B.asmx
Is it possible, before my A.aspx call GetName in B.asmx, I inject or put some codes so when A.aspx try to call the method, it needs to go through my injected code without even changing the code in A.aspx and B.asmx?
Is custom HttpModule able to handle this scenario? If yes, how? Which HttpModule's event that occurred before the page actually called the web service?
I have user's who are losing their data because they sit on a page too long, then are asked to log back in. I want to do the following:
1) Instead of redirecting them to a login page, I want to cancel the current request and give the user a popup dialog box to login with.
2) When the login is successful, I want the user to be sent back to their form, with all data intact. (Even better if the request could go through without sending them back to that form, but this is optional).
How can I intercept these authentication requests, and present the user with a popup login?
I am using ASP.net forms authentication.
I wish to be able to place a System.Web.ActionFilterAttribute on an Action Method and override the OnActionExecuting method to insert business logic which determines if the Action should be fulfilled. Can the ActionExecutingContext be used to cancel the executing Action Method and do one of the following:
Send an HTTP Status Code (and the corresponding <customError> page).Execute a different Action Method within the same Controller.
i hava a gridview, with an sqldatasource control, if an update event goes to faili want intercept the error and manage ithow can i do? i cannot find the error event in gridview
View 2 RepliesI have a small 4-page application for my customers to work through. They fill out information. If they let it sit too long, and the Session timeout out, I want to pop up a javascript alert that their session has expired, and that they need to start over. At that point, then redirected to the beginning page of the application.
I'm getting some strange behavior. I'm stepping through code, forcing my Sessioni.IsNewSession to be true. At this point, I write out a call to Javascript to a Literal Control placed at the bottom of the . The javascript is called, and the redirection occurs.
However, what is happening is.. I am pressing a button which is more or less a "Next Page" button and triggering this code. The next page is being displayed, and then the Alert and redirection occurs. The result I was expecting was to stay on the same page I received the "Timeout", with the alert to pop-up over it, then redirection.
I'm checking for Session.IsNewSession in a BaseClass for these pages, overriding the OnInit event.