I am getting problem in URL rewrite rules. I am used UrlRewritingNet.UrlRewriter Dll for Url rewriting in asp.net website.I used rules name as "Advanced"& Other rule name as DefaultRule that is used for any user profile page(ie. any user's profile page).When I entered username as "AdvancedMachinesTools". That Rules as below:-
I'm trying to redirect any non-www prefixed traffic to the www prefixed domain. I'm using Umbraco as the CMS and have added the following code into the urlrewritingnet config file:
I was wondering it is possible to turn off the canonical hostname URL Rewrite rule from the URL Rewrite 2.0 IIS 7.5 Module.
I'm locally developing on a IIS 7.5. The setting of this URL Rewrite rule is set in the web.config.
This is how I deploy: I'm using Webdeploy to publish my web application. The new web.config transforms, which was introduced with VS 2010, is no option for me, because it is bugged:
[URL] and will not be fixed until the release of VS2010 SP1. I'm also not using web deployment projects anymore, because Webdeploy does not seem working with web deployment projects. As a result, I manually switch on the rewrite rule in the web.config before deploying.
If I now want to locally debug something, I manually need to turn off the rule.
I have the following url which i want to write a helicon RewriteRule rule it should check the pattern startat=/mypage.asp and then only executeOriginal urlhttp://www.test.com/welcome.asp?tartat=/mypage.asp&value1=23&value2=3434&value3=1&value4=someothervaluethe new url http://www.test.com/mynewpage.hcx?startat=/mypage.asp&value1=23&value2=3434&value3=1&value4=someothervalue
if the ASP.NET session problems with FF 4 are solved?I have recently installed the new version of FF and I have done some test with my site, the problems that I have had with the previouse version of FF seem solved, but I would like to be sure.
I'm just trying to teach myself a bit of CSS and it's pretty straight forward but I am getting something odd.
I built a css file, tried out various rules, all good.
Now I edit the css file. Everything compiles ok but it's still using the rules as they were before I edited them. I've even removed some of them from the css file and they're still being used. I tried removing the reference to the css file and the rules all stop being used (as I'd expect) but when I add the reference back in and the old rules reappear but not the new ones.
I'm guessing there's some 'built' version of the css file and that's what's actually being used. But rebuilding the website isn't causing the built css to refresh itself so my edits aren't being picked up.
edit> forget it, I was hitting f5 not ctrl f5. Just a bit of cuture shock switching from desktop dev.
Trying to extract the timezone data from all the time zones using the timezoneinfo class but I have run into a problem. For those timezones that have Daylight savings times I am seeing all kinds of different numbers of adjustmentrules and I have no idea how to determien which rule I shoudl be using for a given timezone. Some have 1 rule, but I see timezones with multiple rules some as high as 11 rules. How do I know which rule I chould be usuing to get the correct DaylightTransitionSart and stop values?
Im using Intelligencia UrlRewriter for url rewriting. I have wrote a set of rules in the web.config file I have two sets pages, Static pages whose name is static but content is CMS based Dynamic pages (actually this is not simply a dynamic page its a category which have description and sub categories) Here both pages are being rewritten from the config file. For instance home page, about us page etc tis is being rewritten as
rewrite url="~/Home" to="~/Default.aspx"
The category page is being the same kind of url its being rewritten as
I have given the rules for the static pages first and then the category url but all the urls are being rewritten to grouphome, even if I have given the rule for home page, about us page etc before the category rule. I have tried even the ollowing still its directing to Group home,
I am considering using the following rules for a casual website. 8-20 chars long valid chars include letters, digits, and symbols case sensitive that's all. My question is, beside white space, is there other symbol that I should consider as "illegal"? Please keep in mind that it is a casual website so I don't need any password policy that is very restricted.
I have 2 projects. A data project, which contains my database and my Entity Framework model. I have table called 'User', and then have a generated EF class for user. I am trying to add a partial class:
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Data.Linq; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace Data { public partial class user { public bool isValid { get { return (GetRuleViolations().Count()==0); } } public IEnumerable<RuleViolation> GetRuleViolations() { yield break; } partialvoid OnValidate(ChangeAction action) { if (isValid) throw new ApplicationException("Rule violation prevents saving"); } } public class RuleViolation { public string ErrorMessage { get; private set; } public string PropertyName { get; private set; } public RuleViolation (string errorMessage) { ErrorMessage = errorMessage; } public RuleViolation(string errorMessage, string propertyName) { ErrorMessage = errorMessage; PropertyName = propertyName; } } }
This is following the MVC 1.0 NerdDinner example. However, I am getting a design time error on the OnValidate method:
partial void OnValidate(ChangeAction action) { if (isValid) throw new ApplicationException("Rule violation prevents saving"); }
No definining declaration found for implimenting declaration of partial method 'void OnValidate(ChangeAction action)' What am I doing wrong?
I sell products throgh my website. Recently we've been given a list of rules that need to be checked against each order, to make sure it's not fraudulent. So this list of rules/fraud indicators will change and grow so I want to make sure it's easily maintainable and really solid. I'm thinking I have an abstract class rule that each of the rules implements.
abstract class Rule { public string Message; public bool Success; public void CheckOrder(OrderItem currentOrder); } class FakeCreditCardNumberRule : Rule { public string Message = "Fake CC Number Rule"; public void CheckOrder(OrderItem currentOrder) { currentOrder.CreditCardNumber = "1234-5678-9012-3456"; Success = false; } } class ReallyLargeOrderRule : Rule { public string Message = "Really Large Order Rule"; public void CheckOrder(OrderItem currentOrder) { currentOrder.ItemsOrder.Count > 100; Success = false; } }
Then I'm thinking of having a class that accepts an Order object in it's costructor and checks though the list of rules. Something like:
class FraudChecker { List<Rule> rules; public FraudChecker(OrderItem currentOrder) { foreach(var rule in rules) { rule.CheckOrder(currentOrder); } } }
So I was trying to think of the best place/best way to populate the FraudChecker.Rules list and started thinking there might be some nice design pattern that does something like what I'm doing. Has anyone seen a design pattern I should use here? Or can anyone think of a good place to populate this list?
I want to use wild card after first slash("/") in my url rewriting but i want other pages to redirect on particular page for e.g. if i use this
<rewrite url="~/(.+)" to="~/default.aspx" />
Then it will redirect all pages to to xyz.com/default.aspx
But i want this will fire last if i use some rule before that if will fire to that page not use this url rewriting like in MVC but i want it in through url rewriting e.g.
Is it possible for an ASP.NET Validation Rule to belong to multiple groups? I'd like to validate the same control in different ways based on what mode the form is in using a single Validator. For the purposes of this question, the modes are Simple, which requires fewer fields, or Complex, which requires more fields. I know I can write CustomValidators (which I have done in the past), but I'd like a simpler solution.
I am having some trouble when I use ASP .Net 4's URL Rewrite feature while Authorization rules configured.
Global.asax
[Code]....
{Root}Web.Config
[Code]....
{Root}RestrictedWeb.config
[Code]....
The problem I am facing is: When I try to visit [URL]- because of my dashboard rule in Global.asax, instead of being redirected to [URL] I am actually getting the content of [URL] when I try to visit [URL] I do get redirected to [URL] which is a good sign.
After pre-compiled a ASP.NET web site, I got many files with the names like
App_Web_accountbalance.aspx.dfa151d5.dll
Do you know the rule for the random chars (in bold) above? Can we fix the random chars? The reason to fix it is that if we modify AccountBalance.aspx file later and re-compile the web site, can we just replace App_Web_accountbalance.aspx.dfa151d5.dll.
How do i create access rule using code in web conf.
for example i have folder named secured and some rootdirectories under it e.g forum, account, members e.t.c so that anoynimous user shall be redirect to login page.
Its working but i have default.aspx page on which i have taken one link button and written event like this
Protected Sub LinkButton1_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles LinkButton1.Click Response.Write("Testing Canonical Issue") End Sub
When i click that linkbutton nothing happens only page get refreshed.
Actually i dont want to display default.aspx page along with my website thats why i have written second rule.
I want domain name with no default.aspx page
if some body writes like this www.abc.com/default.aspx then it must be 301 redirect to www.abc.com
Due to certain reasons, in our ASP.NET web application, it is not recommended to use Response.Redirect("something", True). It should be used with False for the endResponse parameter. We want to enforce this with a custom FxCop rule. I've managed to find the usages of Response.Redirect, but now I want to find the value of the endResponse argument. How can I do this?
We're using the following code:
[Code]....
I've used Introspector and thought the endResponse parameter was an integer behind the scenes, but I'm not so sure anymore. Anyway, there don't seem to be any booleans in the methodCall.Operands.
need to check the actual value of a parameter that's passed to a method?
I have a SQL Server 2000 table with 7 columns and would like to add a constraint that prevents a row being added with the same value for both Col2 and Col3.
So, for example, if Col2 = 205 and Col3 = 5, then the constraint should prevent inserting another row with the values for Col2 = 205 and Col3 = 5.
The following is an example of what I would like to prevent:
I recently added a URL rewrite rule to my website so that all URLs that contain upper case letters are 301 redirected to the same URL, but replaced with lower case letters. [URL] redirect to [URL]. After running the IIS SEO toolkit, it's complaining about unnecessary redirects because of this rule whenever a link containing uppercase letters, like <a href="www.asp.com/MyPage.aspx">click</a>, is within my website. Since it's doing a 301 redirect, does it really hurt to leave the upper case letters in tact in the links, or am I going to have to go through hundreds, possibly thousands of links and manually switch the casing to all lowercase?
