Forms Data Controls :: Listview Dataset Tables[0] DefaultView Sort Not Working?
Jan 15, 2010
I have a Listview control that DataBind programatically... ie I am NOT using SqlDataSource or such... I am attempting to sort a column... clicking on a link button that fires the "Sorting" event. So, after cliking on the column heading... I end up in this routine, where I hardcoded the .Sort = values (just for testing). The code is executed... but the RESULT show via Listview remains the SAME. No change!
How to fix this? I've seen some other posts examples that uses this event (ListView1_Sorting) and then sort via LINQ. I am not ready to try that...
Just want to know why dsPaymentList.Tables[0].DefaultView.Sort does not work?
I populate a DataTable, then sort the DefaultView of that DataTable. When I set the DataTable as the source for my report, the sort doesn't work. here is the code (GetData returns a valid DataTable):
Dim dt As DataTable = a.GetData(Parm1, Parm2, Parm3) If rbtSortByField1.Checked Then dt.DefaultView.Sort = "Field1 ASC" ElseIf rbtSortByField2.Checked Then dt.DefaultView.Sort = "Field2 ASC" ElseIf rbtSortByField3.Checked Then dt.DefaultView.Sort = "Field3 ASC" End If rpt.SetDataSource(dt.DefaultView.Table) 'This also doesn't work 'rpt.SetDataSource(dt)
I'm looking for a way to sort the rows of a datatable without setting the DefaultView.Sort to a specific column. I have a datatable in session that users can add records to. I want them to be able to sort the data by clicking on a button. But new records added after that need to show up at the bottom of the list until the sort button is clicked again.
i would like to sort a listview. i don't have a datasourceID. i bind the datasource manually. i think of using jquery(tablesorter) but i don't know how to use it.
I have another 6-8 fields for the same listview. Due to the amount of fields, some of the field heads are wrapping and are not following the center alignment.
Is there a way I can center align the fields?Also, my listview does not sort. Is there something I am missing here?
I have a listivew that is assigned a datasource in the code behind based on query string options. From what i have found out, once there is no datasource assigned in listview html then the sort feature stops working automatically and you must put the code in the _Sorting event. I cannot find a good example of this logic.
I have a members section of a website where when they first register to become a member, they pick their top 5 sports personalities/stars. Then when they log in to the members area, I want to display members news which should show:
- at the top all new stories that have been their sportstar has been referenced to
- then all other news
(In the CMS, admins can edit a news story and they have 5 dropdowns of all the sportstars so they can for example have for a news story: Sportstar1=Tiger Woods, Sportstar2=David Beckham etc) So as a member, if I have selected David Beckham as one of my top 5s, then all news tagged with him via the CMS are displayed.
There may be a better way to approach it, but basically I am creating one DataSet, then firing off 5 SQL queries, each SQL query is like this:
[Code]....
Then in my Page Load I do this:
[Code]....
The problem is that my repeater is inl showing news for myStar1 i.e. it is nly showing the first table which will be called "News1".
So is there any easier way of doing this? Am I overcomplicating things?
i m trying to bind my both grid with two tables which are in dataset i m trying but when i m binding my gridview it's always binding the second table see code
[Code]....
i already tried to bind both the gv1 and gv2 they both are displaying same table i.e department
i have this xml file which i read using the DataSet.ReadXml( path ) method . The tables created from the Xml file is Related in such a maner that each product has many options. Product is in one table and Options are in another.Now all i want to do is display the related tables in One Gridview. For your reference below is the products Xml file,
[Code]....
Now this is what i have done in the Code behind , have a look below
[Code]....
Now the Grid works Great if i want to Display Individual tables out from Dataset but not when they are related . Please do shine your Knowledge on what should be done to display Child ~ Master relationship. By the way , its a definite NO for someone who would show me that link from msdn about displaying XML data using Xmldatasource and gridview [That's a lousy way to display data]
I'm a newbie to .NET, so the solution might be really trivial. I have a database, I have an Entity Data Model, I add in my Index.aspx page an EntitryDataSource and a GridView. I connect them and everything works fine (the data is displayed as expected). The problem is that clicking on the coulmn name or on the pagination lists doesnt do a thing... Although I did set the properties AllowSorting="True" and AllowPaging="True". I also tried with another datasource type (SqlDataSource) and the same problem.
I'm developing a bilingual web site, and therefore, I'm changing the text of the headings and the select buttons of my gridviews. I just discovered that if I set some code like below in the rowdatabound event of the gridview, the "linkbuttonish" headings get replaced by unclickable text. In another thread, I was told to change
If Session("lang") = "en" Then If e.Row.RowType = DataControlRowType.Header Then e.Row.Cells("name").Text = "Given name"[cod]...
in the myGV_DataBound sub.This works well, but not everywhere. A few gridviews are populated from codebehind, and this is where things go wrong. What happens is that - nothing happens (it's still the original heading). I added a Watch, but once the HeaderText property changed, the Watch never yielded another result, but stayed with the new value.
Now I suspect that even though the HeaderText property has changed, this doesn't get reflected in the GV when populated from codebehind.
I guess that I should write something else than "e.Row.Cells("name").Text" to still have the click-behaviour, but I don't know what.
The same question arises for the select linkbutton in a cell of the gridview's datarows.
I'm developing a bilingual web site, and therefore, I'm changing the text of the headings and the select buttons of my gridviews. I just discovered that if I set some code like below in the rowdatabound event of the gridview, the "linkbuttonish" headings get replaced by unclickable text. Thus, sorting the gridview is suddenly not working. What should I write instead?
If Session("lang") = "en" Then If e.Row.RowType = DataControlRowType.Header Then e.Row.Cells("name").Text = "Given name" End If End If
I guess that I should write something else than "e.Row.Cells("name").Text" to still have the click-behaviour, but I don't know what. The same question arises for the select linkbutton in a cell of the gridview's datarows.
I have a listview that shows the user the details of the members who have sent friendship request. The table from which the data come has two fields namely, sender_id[id of the one who sends friendship request] and receiver_id[id of the one to whom the request is sent].
There will be two columns in the listview. The first would show the pic and the name of the user. The problem is that how am I going to show the pic and the name if the table from where the data come does not contain these info. I know that the sender_id can be used to fetch the pic and name of the sender, but how should it be done?
Earlier I would do something like <%#Eval("fieldName")%>. But in the above described scenario the field is not present in the current table but the other one.
I want to display data from one record in a ListView control. There are two other tables that could contain associated records. For each table, if there is an associated record, I want to display the data from a particular field. I'm only concerned with the item amd alternate templates
My Grid is bound to a collection type datasource. When I try to sort the Columns in the Grid I get Javascript error saying sorting event not implemented. Why is the default inbuilt sort functionality not working which worked fine when I directly used a sqlDataSource using smart tag. Do I have to write some code to achieve sorting ?
I am getting Resultset from SQL server2005.It contains 4 tables.
Dataset ds=new Dataset();
ds=BLogiclayer1.TestMethod1(a,b,c,d);. This normal Dataset ds contains Resultset. ( I am working with RDLC reports. I added a Typed dataset to my project. I am using Typed Dataset as report dataset.) I want to add normal Dataset all the table values to Typed Dataset table as rows i. e. only one table in Typed dataset.I am trying like below.
//Typed Dataset name that I have added is salesdata.
I have a report which is runnin fine as it is using singe table Dataset(.xsd) . I want to expand the report and use more tables in it to show more information .
How can I do so. I am attaching my present code with this.
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load Dim stdate, enddate As Date Dim sql As String start_date.Text = Session("startdate") end_date.Text = Session("endate") Dim dt As DateTime = DateTime.Parse(start_date.Text, System.Globalization.CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("en-gb"))
My dataset table data is from multiple tables (showing on a gridview),How to update the database tables using batch udpate on clicking submit, if the data is from a signle table, no problem, but I am not sure how to handle if the datais from mulitiple tables? If I have related tables, do I need put them in differet tables in the dataset?
I have a stored procedure that returns 3 tables within the single recordset it returns. If I set a SqlDataSource to get data from this procedure, it works, but it only returns the first table. I want to have a GridView display the data from the 2nd or 3rd table using a SqlDataSource, but I can't figure out how to specify a particular table.
While there are some posts discussing this out there, I can't get a definitive answer about whether or not this is even possible (?). In a worst-case scenario, I can create another SP that only returns the 3rd table - but that creates a little maintenance headache that I would prefer to avoid.
