I've been building a project for a customer in framework 4.0.What I didn't know was that he wanted the project built in fw 2.0.Now, my gridview is using a setting called ClientIDMode="Static" to setup a jQuery "tablesorter" function, which makes sorting possible using jQuery.But that settings is not available in 2.0, any ideas how to fix this? If I remove the ClientIDMode setting, the header won't be clickable and sortable.
View 2 RepliesI already wrote Phil Haack about this issue, but got no reply yet. I think he is deep into work and got enough to do. So for the sake that this problem does not disappear I wrote a small sample and perhaps anyone of the MVC 3 team members reads along to check for it. My scenario I was testing is very common. A multilanguage website with a datepicker in a form. I prepared two files, one having jquery.validate.js included an one without. In the version with jquery.validate.js included the datepicker fails. Line 211 throws an error source.replace is not a function. I fixed it with wrapping
if (typeof(source) == "string) { } around it. But none the less the formatting also fails. Instead of having the short date like "11/17/2010" I do have "Wed Nov 17 2010 00:00:00 GMT+0100" now, what actually means, the format function isn't working anymore, localization neither.[URL]
am using an asyncFileUpload in a DotNetNuke project developped with VS2010. I want to set ClientIDMode to AutoID but I get an error message: "ClientIDMode is not a member of asyncFileUpload".
View 2 RepliesWhat is the default for ClientIdMode ona) Pageb) Controlc) UserControl From what I have read it is Predictable, Inherit, Inherit. I expected the default on the Page to be AutoId. Wouldn't Predictable break things?
View 1 RepliesHow should we use ClientIDMode property that comes with asp.net 4.0?... When i should i use one over the other clientIdModes?
View 1 RepliesI would like to have the brand new ClientIDMode and the ClientID property on ASP.NET 3.5 controls, there is any way I can achieve that?I was thinking in replacing the default control compiler, this is possible or there is many changes to make this behavior available?
View 1 RepliesThe event is simply not firing, what am I missing?
Code for the button:
<input type="button" class="button hide" id="savetext" style="float:right;" value="Hello" runat="server" OnServerClick="savetext_Click"/>
And the code that is generated (i.e. when opened in a browser and the source is viewed) is this:
<input onclick="__doPostBack('ctl00$Main$savetext','')" name="ctl00$Main$savetext" type="button" id="savetext" style="float:right;" class="button hide" value="Save to text" />
I've got <pages clientIDMode="Static" /> in web.config but the name and generated onclick event are prefixed despite that. Server side code:
Protected Sub savetext_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs)
End Sub
To be clear, my goal is to register a click on a button server-side, not just client-side.
I wanted to make use of AJAX 4.0 new feature of ClientIDMode.I have a dropdownList inside updatePanel. I defined a unique ID for this control and set the ClientIDMode to be static.The problem is , when I select the dropdown list, the page jumps(postbacks). However this does not happen if I remove the Static setting for CleintIDMode. I have also downloaded a new ajax 4.0 dll from the codeplex library
View 1 RepliesWe have just updated our application from ASP.Net 2.0 to ASP.Net 4.0.We have included in the web.config in the system.web element:
<pages controlRenderingCompatibilityVersion="3.5" clientIDMode="AutoID" />
My understanding is that this is supposed to render the controls the same as .Net 2.0/3.5 would.However.
I have a GridView in an UpdatePanel. As long as the ClientIDMode of the GridView is
not Static, the updating behavior is what expected - any change of the GridView does not affect any area outside the UpdatePanel. As soon as the ClientIDMode of the GridView is changed to Static, the UpdatePanel behaves as if it did not exist - any of the GridView will refresh the entire page.
i have tired your demo
[URL]
but this is not working change your code
<asp:TextBox ID="txtProductDate" ClientIDMode="Static" runat="server" ReadOnly = "true"></asp:TextBox>
it is always updating values to first datepicker
Anyone have any suggestions for 3rd party controls that work entirely client side?By this I mean the following using the example of an invoice:An invoice is a master, with children.I have to be able to select properties on the invoice and add lines to the invoice via a grid to obviously have the customer like my invoice editing window because they don't want to have to enter the basics and then save and then add the line items.In a classic asp.net/mvc.net model the server does the processing. This requires that you either store your data objects in the view state (in this case EF) or you store it in the session.Neither scales worth crap.What I'm looking to do is be able to create an entire form that interacts in javascript using jquery and never posts back to the server to be persistant. It may pull data from the server to update lists and do lookups etc. but it will never have to have the server hold information to be persistant while it's being built (and thus only when the user clicks save will it actually post the data back.In a perfect world what would happen is that the EF object would be converted to javascript and then used and bound, and updated. Once I'm done I'd post back the javascript object and it would be automatically converted to the EF equivalent class which I could then attach and save to the database.By doing this I can eliminate all persistant memory usage and indeed essentially ALL use of the Session or viewstate which would be super powerful.
View 8 RepliesI have a button that uses a ui framework icon on a content page as shown below. I would like it to change state if hover so that the user will know it's clickable. I see there is a.ui-state-hoverclass. How do I apply this to the button?
[Code]....
I host a website that has recently been upgraded from .NET Framework 2.0 to .NET Framework 4.0. Within the website, I have an instance of BlogEngine which still requires .NET Framework 2.0. Each website is in it's own application pool. My issue is that when I browse to the blog portion of my website, I receive a 500.19 error with the following information...
The configuration section 'system.web.extensions' cannot be read because it is missing a section declaration The web.conf file that is listed in the error message is the config file that belongs to my root website which is running .NET Framework 4.0. How do I get the two websites to run together in the same website using different versions of the .NET Framework?
I have this cenario:One server (machine) that have framework 3.5. And one site (website) developed for framework 3.5.This site can not be modified (rebuild in other FW version, or others changes).
I'll developer a new webapplication (WAP) in framework 4.0 (using microsoft visual web developer 2010).
As I know, the new webaplication work in the server, if I install framework 4.0 in the server.
My question is: Can I install the framework 4.0 on the machine that already have framework 3.5. And continue have sites working with other frameworks version?Or, should I develop my new webapplication in framawork 3.5 ?If I can install the framework 4.0, do I need make some specify configuration during the installation?
what is Features added in Framework 2.0 over the framework 1.1? i want in Details?
View 2 RepliesDifference between .net framework 2.0 and .net framework 2.0 with service pack 2
View 4 RepliesWe are developping with .net framework 2.0 on our dev station and we deploy on web server and client desktop a 3 tiers smart client app. what is the impact of ugrading to .net framework 2.0 sp2 on our web servers WITHOUT upgrading on dev station and compilation servers?
View 2 RepliesI recently I have upgraded my web application from 1.1 to 3.5.
Now the problem is support DLLs used in this application still in 1.1 only.
There is no way to change it. While accessing from 3.5 it is not showing any error msg.
But not giving expected results.
Is there any way to run this particular assembly in 1.1 and other in 3.5 ?
I have an old Web application which is using net framework 2.0(build with vs2005), now i need to move the old Web application to production server which has .net framwork 3.5 installed. Do I need recompile the web application with vs2008 or i can just go head move the the Web application without recompiling, it will automatically work?
View 4 RepliesIs there a way to export a EF 4.0 Data Model to EF 3.5?
I looked around and found that we are not able to access EF 4.0 from a ASP.Net 3.5 project here: [URL]
Our project is the 1st to go to .Net 4.0 using Entity Framework and we (the team) were wondering if there was a way for the other projects that "might" need to access our data that are still using the .Net 3.5 framework.
I have two questions, could anybody please answer to those:1) Do I need to install Dotnet framework 2.0 if dotnet framework 3.5 is already installed on the same server?2) Also do I need to install "ASP.NET 2.0 AJAX Extensions 1.0" if higher version is installed on the same server?
View 8 Repliesi have an app runs on framework 1.1 but now i have to move to framework 2.0 ... because i need to update dropdownlist with autocompleate mode but ajax control toolkit just work with .net 2.0 ... the problem is they ask me that i have to be done asap i have problem to convert my app to .net 2.0 and if i have lot of problem how can i handle the dropdownlist wiht autocomplete mode without ajax control tool kit
View 2 Repliesi just wanted to know whether microsoft is offering ASP .net framework as a part of .net 3.5 Framework or is it an add on.
Does 3.5 .net provide support for nHibernate? Is nHibernate part of .net 3.5(I think it is not, but just confirming)
which is the best way to learn Jquery....and what all topics I need to cover to learn Jquery in full...so I could code like a pro.
View 2 Replies