NHibernate Transaction Management In .NET MVC ?
Apr 5, 2010
I am writing a simple ASP.NET MVC using session per request and transaction per request patterns (custom HttpModule).It seems to work properly, but.. the performance is terrible (a simple page loads ~7 seconds). For every http request, graphical resources incuding (all images on the site) a transaction is created and that seems to delay the loading times (without the transactions loading times per one image are ~1-10 ms with transactions they are over 1 second).What is the proper way to manage transactions in ASP.NET MVC + NH stack?
When i've put all transactions into my repository methods, for some obscure reasons I got 'implicit transactions' warning in NHProf (the SQL statements were executed outside transaction, even that in code session.Save()/Update()/etc methods were invoked within transaction 'using' scope and before transaction.Commit() call) BTW are implicit transactions really bad?
View 3 Replies
Similar Messages:
Mar 22, 2011
I need to see an errorcode produced by a SqlException - however, I can't get one to fire. I use NHibernate and have a SQL UNIQUE CONSTRAINT setup on my table. When that constraint is violated, I need to catch the error code and produce a user-friendly message based off of that. Here is a sample of my try/catch:
using (var txn = NHibernateSession.Current.BeginTransaction()) {
try {
Session["Report"] = report;
_reportRepository.SaveOrUpdate(report);
txn.Commit();
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
Aug 6, 2010
There is a variations in time taken to execute the queries when we concider (setting) following options in a transactionsUsing the default connection Opening a Explicit connection Enable Pooling Disable Pooling
View 1 Replies
Jun 15, 2010
I've got all of my ASP.NET requests wrapped in a Session and a Transaction that gets commited only at the very end of the request. At some point during execution of the request, I would like to insert an object and make it visible to other potential threads - i.e. split the insertion into a new transaction, commit that transaction, and move on. The reason is that the request in question hits an API that then chain hits another one of my pages (near-synchronously) to let me know that it processed, and thus double submits a transaction record, because the original request had not yet finished, and thus not committed the transaction record.
So I've tried wrapping the insertion code with a new SessionScope, TransactionScope(TransactionMode.New), combination of both, flushing everything manually, etc. However, when I call Refresh on the object I'm still getting the old object state. Here's some code sample for what I'm seeing:
Post outsidePost = Post.Find(id); // status of this post is Status.Old
using (TransactionScope transaction = new TransactionScope(TransactionMode.New))
{
Post p = Post.Find(id);
p.Status = Status.New; // new status set here
p.Update();
SessionScope.Current.Flush();
transaction.Flush();
transaction.VoteCommit();
}
outsidePost.Refresh();
// refresh doesn't get the new status, status is still Status.Old
View 1 Replies
Jan 7, 2011
We can catch the error log information by use EXEC xp_readerrorlog. I am just wondering is SQL have other types of log for us to reference information
I didn't wrote trigger for my tables... one table was missing, would it possible to know when the table was be deleted by some kind of transaction log?
View 6 Replies
Feb 25, 2010
What is the best way to format a transaction id?Conditions Max 15 characters: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX -All transaction must be unique -Can contain both numerical and alphabetical characters -May contain Year, month, day
View 1 Replies
Jan 2, 2010
disconnected mode and transaction.it's give to me ERROR message
Quote.ExecuteReader requires the command to have a transaction when the connection assigned to the command is in a pending local transaction. The Transaction property of the command has not been initialized
PHP Code:
da.InsertCommand = cb.GetInsertCommand
my code is:
PHP Code:
Dim con As New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("DBCon").ConnectionString)
Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("insert into Customer (customer_id, customer_name, note) values (@cid, @cname, @note)", con)
Dim da As New SqlDataAdapter("select * from CustomerPhone", con)
| [code]....
View 7 Replies
Dec 10, 2010
table 1
[Code]....
Table 2
[Code]....
my stored procedure
[Code]....
when ever i m passing the wrong the value in second table while updating its not updating the table but the problem it is inserting the value in first table i want the whole trans should proceed if success if not rollback
View 2 Replies
Sep 23, 2010
I know these 2 commands
sp_who and sp_who2 → knowing who are updateing
DBCC log (DB_NAME,4) → I can't really understand these information..
just wondering does there exists a log file, so we can check who have updated database from it?
View 3 Replies
Feb 16, 2011
I want to know is there any method or any concept to save transactions before system crash or failure. I am doing project in C# and backend is sql server 2005.
View 1 Replies
Feb 23, 2011
[Code]....
Now,
1. If In transaction scope if 1st Transaction is commited, buting 2nd one exception occurs and it is rolled back
2. Any other exception occurs, after 1st transaction is completed/commited
Here, explicit transactions are used. In both cases does all transactions in the scope are revert back? What are the possiblities here?
View 7 Replies
Feb 2, 2011
i'm using the entity data model to insert data to my database. the thing is that when inserting data to more than one table i want to ensure that all actions completed correctly(or catch an exeption if not).
View 1 Replies
Dec 9, 2010
I was thinking of formatting it like this
TYYYYMMDDNNNNNNNNNNX
(1 character + 19 digits)
Where
T is type
YYYY is year
MM is month
DD is day
N is sequencial number
X is check digit
The problem is, how do I generate the sequencial number? since my primary key is not an auto increment integer value, if it was i would use that, but its not.
EDIT can I have the sequencial number resets itself after 1 day (24hours).
P201012080000000001X <-- first
transaction of 2010/12/08
P2010120810000000002X <--- second
transaction of 2010/12/08
P201012090000000001X <--- First
transaction of 2010/12/09
(X is the check digit)
View 6 Replies
Sep 23, 2010
Here is my code:
[Code]....
The problem is that the transaction is not working.For instance,now the code is correct so both sql statements are getting executed.However,yesterday the 'update' statement was incorrect but I could not realise that IT WAS NOT ALRIGHT, because the function was not throwing myTrans.Rollback().I had put a breakpoint and there was no rollback.Apparently, now the sql statements,above,are ok,so there is no issue at the moment,however if there was an error,still the function would execute as if the sql statements were successful.
I know that I can use a Stored procedure and finish with it.But i want to see it how the Transaction works using SQLtransaction class.
View 2 Replies
Mar 15, 2010
I have written several queries under one single transaction. When any of the query throws an error then the whole transaction should rollback. However, in some rare cases say 2% cases even after the error the next transaction is getting comitted.
note that all transaction processes (opening, committing and rollback) is done through .net.
I am using 64bit windows 2003 for data and application server. And website is configured for runapp32on64.
View 6 Replies
Mar 27, 2011
i have a Tag Table TagId TagName
Post Table PostId PostName
TagPost Table TagId PostId
How can i do a many to many insert into database in one transaction?
View 4 Replies
Jan 24, 2011
I have a multiple database operation, Have three tables (MSsql) and need to delete one row in each table in one operation, one after another. (Three functions, three rows of code). Everything is working as it should be, recently I was advised to use a transaction scope, which should guarantee the safety of deletion from all 3 tables together.
Here is my new code:
[Code]....
Locally all worked just fine, the transaction scope worked well, but when I have uploaded my application to my hosting server, I got an error of: The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8004D025).I talked with the host support, they tried to do something, then I got this error: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED)).
After a 2 days, They have contacted me, they said it is not possible to disable some restriction, that will allow an access to this operation, because I'm using shared hosting, and I need to upgrade my plan to VPS. VPS is a very expensive for me, and I can't afford it, What I'm looking is a some similar way of doing the same operation as transaction scope do, that may work at my hosting, At least I would like to try something else. Is there any additional way for the transaction scope?
View 1 Replies
Mar 5, 2010
i searched on google for a simple explanation of digest authentication but didn't find any good ones. How does it differ from Basic Authentication other than sending credentials as plain text?
give an example of the transaction.
View 2 Replies
Aug 13, 2010
i'm dealing with an ASP.NET 4.0 Web Forms Application in which the DAL is built with a combination of LINQ-SQL and classic ADO.NET (for auditing transactions, and bulk updates).
I have an admin page on the site which performs an update on a bunch of records (could be thousands), and not to mention there is T-SQL triggers in place on those records. Needless to say, its a killer of an update.
So of course, the page is timing out. The update transaction is performing with the following code:
db.ExecuteCommand("UPDATE [tblFoo] SET [IsFoo] = 0 WHERE [Bar] = {0}", bar.Id);
So it's a classic ADO.NET bulk update.
What i've tried to do is make the call to this method asynchronous, by firing off a thread on the button click on the form:
[code]...
The method OnMyAsyncMethod simply executes the above ADO.NET call.
This solved the UI problem, being the page now posts back and refreshes immediately. But then around 30 seconds lateri see that wonderful little flashing light on my Visual Studio toolbar - "an unhandled exception has occured, would you like to attach to process, etc".
So of course, now the actual call in the DAL is timing out.
Am i doing this wrong - is there a way i can perform the update transaction (db.ExecuteCommand) totally asynchrously?
Hopefully you see what im trying to do - i just need to fire off a killer of a T-SQL transaction. The only thing i need back from the call is the number of rows updated.
View 2 Replies
Oct 21, 2010
I have a deadlock problem that occurs every 5 minutes on SQL update. I get the following error randomly - means qurey failed one time every 200 calls. I'm using transaction scope to manage transaction.
code:
using(TransactionScope scope =
new
TransactionScope())
{
SELECT ... FROM TABLE1
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
scope.Complete();
}
error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Transaction (Process ID 51) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction
stack trace:
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, DbAsyncResult result)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()
at DAL.RunSQL(String query, SqlParameter[] parameters, Boolean openTransact) in C:prjDAL.cs:line 215
I took trace in SQL about deadlock and same SQL query is mentioned bu deadlock. I do not understand how to resolve this deadlock.
SQL log:
deadlock-list
deadlock victim=process5462718
process-list
process taskpriority=0 logused=0 waitresource=KEY: 20:72057597472604160 (ce004d0b917a) waittime=30 ownerId=5937428 transactionname=user_transaction lasttranstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.050 XDES=0x5d00280 lockMode=X schedulerid=2 kpid=2168 status=suspended
spid=65 sbid=0 ecid=0 priority=0 trancount=2 lastbatchstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.110 lastbatchcompleted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.110 clientapp=.Net SqlClient Data Provider hostname=IPTBEWKS017 hostpid=3112 loginname=iptuserjde isolationlevel=serializable (4) xactid=5937428
currentdb=20 lockTimeout=4294967295 clientoption1=671088672 clientoption2=128056
executionStack
frame procname=adhoc line=1 stmtstart=222 sqlhandle=0x0200000086adfa0c959ccbdd7ef0e31e854e3a987706ae38
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
frame procname=unknown line=1 sqlhandle=0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
unknown
inputbuf
(@UId nvarchar(9),@F1 nvarchar(9),@F2 nvarchar(9),@F3 int,@F4 int,@F5 datetime)UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
process taskpriority=0 logused=0 waitresource=KEY: 20:72057597472604160 (cc0078aef293) waittime=88 ownerId=5937412 transactionname=user_transaction lasttranstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04 XDES=0x2b028280 lockMode=X schedulerid=1 kpid=6788 status=suspended
spid=74 sbid=0 ecid=0 priority=0 trancount=2 lastbatchstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.050 lastbatchcompleted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.050 clientapp=.Net SqlClient Data Provider hostname=IPTBEWKS017 hostpid=3112 loginname=iptuserjde isolationlevel=serializable (4) xactid=5937412
currentdb=20 lockTimeout=4294967295 clientoption1=671088672 clientoption2=128056
executionStack
frame procname=adhoc line=1 stmtstart=222 sqlhandle=0x0200000086adfa0c959ccbdd7ef0e31e854e3a987706ae38
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
frame procname=unknown line=1 sqlhandle=0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
unknown
inputbuf
(@UId nvarchar(9),@F1 nvarchar(9),@F2 nvarchar(9),@F3 int,@F4 int,@F5 datetime)
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
resource-list
keylock hobtid=72057597472604160 dbid=20 objectname=dbipt_rc41_02.dbo.TABLE1 indexname=PK_TABLE1 mode=RangeS-U associatedObjectId=72057597472604160
owner-list
owner id=processdbbe40 mode=RangeS-S
waiter-list
waiter mode=X requestType=convert
keylock hobtid=72057597472604160 dbid=20 objectname=dbipt_rc41_02.dbo.TABLE1 indexname=PK_TABLE10 mode=RangeS-U associatedObjectId=72057597472604160
owner-list
owner mode=RangeS-S
waiter-list
waiter id=processdbbe40 mode=X requestType=convert
I have tried to analyse the trace with this post but unsuccessfully: [URL] UId is my primary key - I do select on F3 column just before in same transaction but i have also an index on F3 column.
->
Spid 65 is running this query (line 2 of proc [p1]):
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
Spid 74 is running this query (line 2 of proc [p2]):
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
View 5 Replies
Jan 20, 2011
I need a windows service. This service will start when userId insert on myDatabase.And after I want to handle this userId send
to my web service.If webservice return true I insert this userId another table on mydatabase. How can I write this?
View 5 Replies
May 20, 2010
Can I code to add transaction for some subs? If there is an error in any sub will roll back.For example, sub1 delete some tablessub2 insert data into tables which just be deletedsub3 send out confirmation emailsub4 make submit button disable
View 3 Replies
Jan 4, 2010
How can I do the reverse of a regular PayPal transaction. The only information I found in their documents was for the customer to pay us for things. What if we want to pay out the customer?
Is there a way to give a transaction type to reverse and pay out to the customer instead of them paying us?
Update: Turns out you can use Mass Payments to pay out to customers... just needed to look on StackOverflow a bit more [URL]
View 1 Replies
Sep 24, 2010
I need to run 5 different WCF methods but within a transaction. Is this possible in WCF? How can I do this in WCf, if it's possible?
The WCF methods will be called from the web service client, which could be an ASP.Net app or Winfoms app.
View 1 Replies
Aug 31, 2010
is there a way do something like this:
[Code]....
View 5 Replies
