I try to sort a dictionary with no success
this code i wrote
var sortedDict = _GrandTotalUserDictionary.OrderBy(key => key.Value.Priority);
the dictionary looks like
"key1", new OrderItem(){title:'a', priority:1}
"key2", new OrderItem(){title:'b', priority:3}
"key3",
new OrderItem(){title:'c', priority:12}
How do you sort a dictionary object in C# 2.0 for asp.net or is their an alternative to Dictionay for sorting this is to sort a countries list alphabetically
View 3 RepliesI have an Entity class which has a Dictionary of fields called Data. Now I want to sort Entities by a field in Data. I was able to verify the Linq expression for using fields in a dictionary as e.Data["UserId"] as this seemed to work perfectly when I used LINQ to Objects. e.g. Entities.OrderBy(e => e.Data["UserId"])
However this same expression does not generate the correct NHibernate criteria and errors out finally with a NullReferenceException for propertyName at Hibernate.Loader.Criteria.CriteriaQueryTranslator.GetEntityName(ICriteria subcriteria, String propertyName)in CriteriaQueryTranslator.cs: line 541.
On debugging through NHibernate code, I figured that NHibernate.Linq.Visitors.MemberNameVisitor.GetMemberName(ICriteria rootCriteria, Expression expr) returns a null string in place of the field name after visiting expr using its visitor. This seems to be the cause of grief. I am using an older version of NHibernate (2.1). Are there any limitations in the NHibernate Linq visitor I should be aware of?
If I have a specific order that I want to sort my List by, how do I do that? For instance, I have a list of items (coming from a database), with ID's ... and they come in order, i.e 1, 2, 3, 4. After receiving this list, I'd like to reorder the list above based on a specific order, e.g. 2, 4, 1, 3. How do I do this without complicate it too much?
View 11 RepliesI have 2 tables with a relationship by EmployeeID (Employee, Cases)
The relationship name is Purchases (ie employee->Purchases), and iterating through it gives each row in order by date (entry order perhaps?).
There could be thousands of rows, so I want to present this collection in reverse date order.
Would I have to define a provider or repository to call instead of just Employee->Purchases?
I am wondering if the aspnet_Users table is always sorted (by UserName) even if I add new users which are alphabetically between two already existing users.
I've noticed that the method Membership.GetAllUsers() always seems to return a sorted collection of MembershipUsers.
Also when I look into SQL Server Management Studio and run a simple SQL query without ORDERBY clause...
SELECT [UserName]
FROM [MyDb].[dbo].[aspnet_Users]
...I get always a sorted result list.
I'm still very unfamiliar with SQL Server but I expected that when I add a new row to a table it is (physically) appended to the end of the table. And when I run a select statement without ORDERBY the rows will be selected in the order they were initially inserted into the database (so without any specific sort order).
I am wrong I guess. But how does it really work? Is it perhaps something special with the aspnet_Users table?
I am happy that the MemberShipUserCollection returned by GetAllUsers() is sorted but is it always guaranteed?
Update
I've just noticed that the database contains a stored procedure called aspnet_Membership_GetAllUsers. This procedure actually contains an ORDER BY clause by UserName. So if this stored procedure is indeed always called when I use Membership.GetAllUsers() in my code (at least if I am using the SqlMembershipProvider) it explains why the collection returned by Membership.GetAllUsers() is sorted by UserName.
Remains the question: Is Membership.GetAllUsers() actually based on this stored procedure?
How do I sort a data table based on a particular column which has integer values in ascending order?
I wrote this:
leadtable.DefaultView.Sort = "Id"
But it doesnt seem to work, it displays fine but when i get try to get the values of the sorted datatable in an array they dont come in an sorted ordere Datatble is defined as:view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
I am trying to correct the sort order of my ASP.NET drop down list.
The problem I have is that I need to select a distinct Serial number and have these numbers organised by DateTime Desc.
However I cannot ORDER BY DateTime if using DISTINCT without selecting the DateTime field in my query.
However if I select DateTime this selects every data value associated with a single Serial number and results in duplications.
The purpose of my page is to display data for ALL Serials, or data associated to one serial. When a new cycle begins (because it is a new production run) the Serial reverts to 1. So I cannot simply organise by serial number either.
When I use the following SQL statement the list box is in the order I require but after a period of time (usually a few hours) the order changes and appears to have no organised structure.
My webGrid is working perfectly fine. However, I would like the default sort order to be in the opposite direction. If it were SQL, I'd be adding a DESC somewhere. Here's my working line of code:
[Code]....
It correctly sorts on the UWDate column, but I would like it to sort the opposite sort order. Of course, once it is displayed, you can click on the title and it will resort at that time.
How to sort the dataset Values in Descending order , I have Followed the following way
decimal Length = 94;
decimal Width = 7;
decimal Height = 13;
DataTable dtCarton = new DataTable();
[Code]....
I have the following code for a gridview. When I click the Header, it can be sorted by ascending order. But if click the header again , it is still ordered by descending. What I want is that the sort order can be reversed when click the header again. How to do that?
protected void gvList_Sorting(object sender, GridViewSortEventArgs e)
{
DataTable m_DataTable = (DataTable) Session["gvListDatasource"] ;
if (m_DataTable != null)
{
[Code].....
Here's my gridview when it comes it it's sorts on Age. Sorting is available for all columns/headers. How do I make the sort order to change on the ddsrpt sort to desc order when it's clicked?
<asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False"
DataSourceID="SqlDataSource7" EnableModelValidation="True" Width="789px"
CaptionAlign="Top" Height="126px" BackColor="White" BorderColor="#DCBE68"
BorderStyle="Solid" BorderWidth="1px" CellPadding="4"
HorizontalAlign="Center" CellSpacing="2" Font-Names="Arial"
AllowSorting="True" EmptyDataText="No Records" DataKeyNames="FO,CLMSSN">
[Code] ....
I got this error message - Gridviewsortdirection is not declared
For our website, we have decided we would like to maintain our user passwords as encrypted binary data in our database. We are using ASP.NET 3.5 to host our site and SQL Server Express 2008 for the database, both running on the same server. When a user logs in and submits a username and password, there will need to be some sort of encryption or decryption in order to verify the credentials. To me, it would appear that there are 3 ways to do this:
1)[C# Encyrption] On User creation, perform encryption in the Web App and submit the encrypted password to the database. To verify credentials at Login, perform the same encryption on the submitted password and ensure that it matches the value stored in the database.
2)[SQL Encryption] On User creation, submit the plain-text password to the database and have it perform one of the SQL encryption variants during INSERT. To verify credentials at Login, have the database perform decryption on the password during the SELECT statement, and compare the plain-text submitted password to the one in the database.
3)[Mix] On User creation, submit the plain-text password to the database, and have it perform one of the SQL encryption variants during INSERT. To verify credentials at Login, perform the same encryption algorithm used by SQL on the submitted password ( is this possible? ), and ensure that it matches the value stored in the database.
Does anybody have an opinion as to which of these options is best? Number 1) is the most familiar to me, and would be the easiest to use with LINQ to SQL ( which is our current data model ), so I am leaning towards that. But if there are better options I would love to know about them.
I want to orderby the list. Today date is on the top and then next date and all dates but when today date is passed then it comes on the end of the list. Is there any formal query in linq or some other code is used to achieve this?
08/01/2015
09/01/2015
but when today is passed then it automatically go to end and next today date is on the top
How do I sort a data table based on a particular column which has integer values in ascending order?
I wrote this:
'Sort the datatable based on sequence id leadtable.DefaultView.Sort ="Id" But it doesnt seem to work Datatble is defined as:
[Code]....
I have a datatable,columns are(User_id,Name,Address,DOB)
values like(12,abc,delhi,22/2/2000)
(14,pqr,mumbai,13/3/1989)
(8,klm,banglore,17/5/2001)
(9,asd,pune,12/9/1999)
Now I want to sort these rows on DOB in descending order..how can i do so?
I have a class that maintains a static dictionary of cached lookup results from my domain controller - users' given names and e-mails.My code looks something like:
private static Dictionary<string, string> emailCache = new Dictionary<string, string>();
protected string GetUserEmail(string accountName)
{
if (emailCache.ContainsKey(accountName))
{
return(emailCache[accountName]);
}
lock(/* something */)
{
if (emailCache.ContainsKey(accountName))
[code]...
I want to create a Dictionary... where i can get Dictionary database or World lists (english to english , english to hindi)
View 1 RepliesI have a simple dynamic gridview with following code -
GV = new GridView();
Actually i want to ask which is the best for sorting in Asp.Net is it DataView.Sort Method or List<Object>.Sort() method.
View 1 RepliesI'm looking for a way to sort the rows of a datatable without setting the DefaultView.Sort to a specific column. I have a datatable in session that users can add records to. I want them to be able to sort the data by clicking on a button. But new records added after that need to show up at the bottom of the list until the sort button is clicked again.
View 2 RepliesI have 5 hard corded texboxes in a page in a sequence with sequence Number . Now i want to add re-order /re-arraning functionaly .. but i can't use ajax reorder list because i have 5 hard corded texbox. how can i maintain the order in Insert/Update cases. And also suggest me control that i can use, another than ajax re-order list. coz i not using any list items i have hard corded items on the page.
View 1 RepliesThe AjaxToolkit has a ReorderList. I'm searching for a jQuery solution that does the same and found this page. I would like to change the order of divs (vertically) and upload the new order to the database (ajax).
View 2 RepliesI have two table Order and Order Detail.
What i need is i need to bind last 10 Order in Gridview/details view with paging, and the same order detail also fetch from database and shown in another gridview.. if user click any oderNo in first Gridview/DetailView then i need to show Respective order detail in anther gridview..
without postback coz we already fetch 10 order with orderdetails from the database..and if user click next 10 orderNo using paging then again we need to load 10 orderNo with respective orderdeatils from database like this going on....as well as let me know how to take print of particular oder and order detail....?
From my testing, it appears that the order of parameters for the UpdateParameters must match both the order of the bound fields on the form (asp:Formview), and the order of the parameters in the UpdateCommand. Is that correct? If so, why do the parameters have names if all that matters is the order? I tried both asp:ControlParameter and asp:Parameter. Maybe the more relevant question is why aren't the names used instead of the order, particularly for the form order?
So, given I display the Identity field (CID), and need that for the update, I cannot get the update to work without including it in the UpdateCommand. Of course, since it is an autonumber field in Access, I cannot actually set it. So, I had to add another field to the db (lngUpdateCID) that I could set. That can't be how it has to be done, but I could not figure out another way to do this.
The relevant code is below:
[Code]....