I fill a third-pard component variable in Global.Application_BeginRequest(). Everything is fine until I set IIS7 into the Integrated mode. In that case the method Application_BeginRequest() is not called (Application_Start is ok).May be some module is registered wrong?(I have found a same problem here on forum, but without a solution:[URL]
View 1 Replieswe are running a complex 64-bit ASP.NET 2.0 application on W2008 R2 Standard and stress tests done with VS2008 Team System have indicated that integrated pipeline mode is 30% slower than classic mode.
We have compared the application traces extensively and it appears that integrated mode is uniformly slower than classic. That is, there is no single point that causes delays in integrated mode.
This is quite the opposite to everything Microsoft says about the integrated pipeline, so it might be that there is something quite wrong with the configuration of the integrated mode or the server. But we have not found any settings that would have any effect on this. Some complaints that Sharepoint and reporting services are slower in integrated mode can be found, but our application does not use them so this is quite likely unrelated.
I just switched from Classic Mode to Integrated Mode and now HttpContext doesn't seem to exist in my ASP.NET application. I can't even add a Watch to HttpContext nor to HttpContext.Current.
I'm using FluorineFX where in the Web.config a HttpModule is defined. Apparently, in IIS7 Integrated Mode, these HttpModules need to be added to the Modules section in System.WebServer. I have done this, but now I'm having this HttpContext problem...
Code is in a simple service class being called by Flex (amf).
if (HttpContext.Current.User.Identity != null)
{
...
Web.Config (I don't know how to display this properly in Stack...):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
[Code]....
In IIS6 the scenario below is working perfectly.I have an HttpModule called URLRedirect which examines URLS and by using RegEx rewrites of applicable. An example is a URL "/doc47.pdf" gets redirected to docpdf.ashx?id=47 Then the docpdf.ashx used the id value and, using a database builds an application/pdf document and returns it. Since I need to validate that the user has access to the data, the first line of the ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) function is:if (context.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated) ..... This is where the problem occurs, but more details first.
On a webpage, access to which is restricted to lgged on users who meet certain criteria there is a link which allows the user to present the page as a PDF document. This is achieved by using javascript to open a popup window using the window.open("/doc47.pdf", ... ) function.This all works fine under IIS6 and under IIS7 if I change the mode to Classic. But, under IIS7 in integrated mode, the following happens.The line in doc.ashx described above raises an exception because context.User == null. But, and this is interesting, if instead of using the link that opens the popup window I instead type /doc.pdf?id=47 into the address bar, the PDF document displays correctly.So this indicates to me that the URLRedirect Module is somehow losing the logged on user information.
migrating my ASP.NET project from IIS 6 to IIS 7.5 I came across an issue with the Managed Pipeline Mode set to 'Integrated'.I have a Global.asax file in my web root to initialize some objects, gather data etc., however I am not able to hit breakpoints in the associated code-behind file (VS 2008). The code is executing very well (as I can tell from Eventlog), but I want to step into all that initializing there and need to have the debugger attached properly.Everything is working as expected in Classic pipeline mode. Since I'd like to benefit from Integrated Mode features in the future I wonder if I have to give up the ability to debug my Application start and error events...
View 1 Repliesam trying to write an HttpModule that will work in IIS7 with integrated pipeline mode AppPool. Within this module I need to access Session variables and to be able to capture the Session Start and End events. I have found a couple of articles on this topic that indicate the need to modify the behavior of the HttpHandler in PostAcquireRequestState to force the Session for the context to be initialized. The article I am using as a template is posted here:[URL]In my case I am getting the following error:
[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.] System.Web.PipelineModuleStepContainer.GetEventCount(RequestNotification notification, Boolean isPostEvent) +30 System.Web.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error) +1112
System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb) +113 System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context) +616
I believe that this error implies a problem with attempting to attach an event handler multiple times. I am aware that the modules Init function can be called more than once and have set a static initialization flag which ensures that I will only ever attach the event handler once.In the most condensed form my code is as follows:
public class HttpModule : IHttpModule, IRequiresSessionState
I am trying to export crystal report to pdf in asp.net, though the code is working well on localhost but on server I get error
HTTP Error 500.23 - Internal Server ErrorAn ASP.Net setting detected that does not apply in Integrated managed pipeline mode.
The crystal report is showing abnormal behaviors.I am using a CrystalReportViewer on which i have set the CrystalReportSource1 using the viewer Tasks.
The code on page load is :-
cn.Open();
DataSet ds = new DataSet();
string sql = "select * from Test";
OleDbDataAdapter da = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql, cn);
da.Fill(ds);
[Code].....
During the troubleshooting i encountered another unusual issue, where i tried a new crystal report with just simple report. That simple crystal report is not showing data & the toolbar images are not rendered. I googled on this but didn't found conclusive thing.
I've got some tracing statements with timestamps on an ASP.Net IIS application that gets a lot of traffic. I've got trace statements at the end of Application_BeginRequest and the beginning of Application_PreRequestHandlerExecute in my Global.asax. Occasionally there is a big delay between the end of BeginRequest and the start of PreRequestHandlerExecute, i.e. more than 5 seconds.
What is going on in the lifecycle of an HttpRequest between these two method calls that could be taking so long? This is IIS7 on Windows Server 2008.
I have a site with multiple domains pointing to it. I wanted to redirect all requests to main domain so I've created a method called RedirectToRealDomain("domain.com") to check and redirect all requests to my preferred domainAt the moment it lives on Session_Start but I am planing to move it to Application_BeginRequest event. As I understand Session_Start only raised when new session started but Application_BeginRequest raised on all requests. RedirectToRealDomain method doesn't do any DB lookups or anything expensive apart from comparing strings.
View 2 RepliesI am trying to create a 404 handling page but I am now stuck with the page only working for .aspx files, which isn't really what I need.I am running on IIS6.The site has a wildcard mapping,for extensionless URLs.All requests go through Application_BeginRequest in Global.asax but not all errors go through Application_Error.Is there a way where I can get the Application_Error to raise for non .aspx files?
This is the code inside the Application_Error
HttpException serverError = (HttpException)Server.GetLastError();
if (serverError != null) {
[code]...
I want to protect one file in a subdirectory with Global.asax. (I know that this isn't the conventional way of going about this) but it works on my computer and not on the server.I have a global.asax file in my root dir and Application_BeginRequest checks if the user is requesting a particular file. If they are logged in, it allows access. If they are not logged in they are redirected to the default page.My problem is this: My code works on my personal computer but does not work on the server. Do I have to configure a setting in the web.config or adjust something on the server? Code:
Sub Application_BeginRequest(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
Dim fullOrigionalpath As String = Request.Url.ToString.ToLower
'PROTECTED FILE
If fullOrigionalpath.Contains("/uploads/groups.xls") Then
If HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated = False Then Response.Redirect("~/login.aspx")
End If
End Sub
I am doing some redirecting of old url in global.asax's application_beginrequest. Redirecting works fine when getting the url's using an http get but not when using an http head request.
View 4 RepliesAfter some changes in web.config now IIS allows characters like ":" in URL but it makes some modifications. For example:
http://localhost/a///b => http://localhost/a/b (remove all slashes but one)
http://localhost/a => http://localhost/a/b (changes backslash with slash)
...
I want URL string from within a HttpHandler (I use Request.RawUrl) as it is without any change.
I have an application we bought that I need to integrate, and it uses jakarta connection to get to the application from IIS.So, the basic operation is
View 1 RepliesFirstly there's a great overview of the IIS7 HTTP request lifecycle and various settings that affect performance here:
ASP.NET Thread Usage on IIS 7.0 and 6.0
Very specifically though, in dotNet 4 the defaults for maxConcurrentRequestsPerCPU and requestsQueueLimit are set to 5000. E.g. equivalent to: (in aspnet.config):[code]....
Seems to me that on a multi-CPU/core server the requestQueueLimit here will always be invoked well berfore the 'perCPU' limit. Thus, if a max of 5000 requests per CPU is what you actually want then I would expect that the requestQueueLimit needs to be increased to 5000 * CPUCount or just disabled altogether.
Is my interpretation correct? If so can I disable requestQueueLimit? (set it to zero?). The documentation on this setting doesn't appear to address this question (so maybe I'm missing something or misreading?)
** side note from the above article: The requestQueueLimit is poorly named. It actually limits the maximum number of requests that can be serviced by ASP.NET concurrently. This includes both requests that are queued and requests that are executing. If the "Requests Current" performance counter exceeds requestQueueLimit, new incoming requests will be rejected with a 503 status code)
I am looking for code to upload to a shared web host that will return whether or not the web site is running in integrated pipeline mode.
View 1 RepliesI am using the following code for URL RewritePath
[code]....
but its giving the following error
CurrentNotification = 'System.Web.HttpContext.Current.CurrentNotification' threw an exception of type 'System.PlatformNotSupportedException'
base {System.NotSupportedException} = {"This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode."}
}
}
Is it possible to check if our code is executing in Integrated Pipeline Mode or not?
There are some ASP.NET class properties that only work in Integrated Pipeline Mode, and I want to avoid raising an exception if there is a way to test if our code is executing in that environment or not.
Generally we should have control of our AppPools and be able to force the Managed Pipeline Mode. In my case I don't have control and would like to implement the code behind code a little differently based on the Managed Pipeline Mode (Integrated vs Classic). I just don't know how to detect this. Is there a simple way to do it from within the code behind page?
View 1 RepliesUltimately, we need to know if version 8.0 of the .net Sql ReportViewer control is compatible with IIS7 running in Integrated Pipeline Mode.Regardless of the countless forum posts and articles we've read and suggestions we've tried, we've been unable to get this combination to work.
We're in the process of upgrading our websites. We're having trouble with using the 8.0 version of the ReportViewer control with IIS 7 in Integrated mode. Below is a summary of our previous setup and what we're attempting to upgrade/change to.
Our previous setup:IIS 7 Classic Pipeline Mode.Net Framework 3.5 ReportViewer 8.0 Local Mode (control used within websites - no separate Sql Reporting Server)
Attempting to upgrade to IIS 7 Integrated Pipeline Mode.Net Framework 4.0 ReportViewer 8.0 Local Mode - NO CHANGE
Our sites are all working fine except for the use of the ReportViewer control. We're not ready to upgrade our reports to version 10.0 so we wanted to continue using version 8.0.
Since we're now using the Integrated pipeline mode of IIS7, we changed our root level web.config files of our websites to contain the handler for the report viewer in the system.webServer/handlers section instead of the system.web/httpHandlers section.We're receiving the following error when attempting to access a page that contains the ReportViewer control,
Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ReportViewerHandlerNotRegisteredException: The Report Viewer Web Control HTTP Handler has not been registered in the application's web.config file. Add <add verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type
"Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler,
Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=8.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" /> to the system.web/httpHandlers section of the web.config file.We can't add the handler to the system.web/httpHandlers section of the web.config file since we're running in IIS7 Integrated Pipeline Mode.
We've tried both manually modifying the web.config file to include the handler in the system.webServer/handlers section as well as adding it via IIS. Both methods produce the same result.So, is version 8.0 of the ReportViewer control not compatible with IIS7 in Integrated Pipeline Mode? If it is compatible, what are we doing wrong? If it is not compatible, is version 9.0 of the ReportViewer control compatible?Here are the pertinent sections of our web.config files:
[Code]....
I try to install IIS 7 on my Win 7, whenever I check . Net Extensibility . AsP .net under Application Development Feature and run http://localhost I get http error 500.24. An asp .net setting has been detected that does not apply in Integrated managed pipeLine mode
View 1 RepliesI'm having a tough time implementing mixed-mode authentication (windows & forms based) for my application using IIS 7. Doing it in IIS6 is easy, but the process doesn't translate to 7/7.5 - and my research has led to me to conflicting answers, none of which.
I have redirect page called WindowsLogin.aspx, and a forms-based one called Login.aspx. I'm having difficulty enabling Windows authentication for just WindowsLogin.aspx.
I am trying to implement single sign on for users within our domain and if the are not then they get re-directed to the login screen to use forms authentication.
I have followed this tutorial below
however I get two issues firstly if I go to my forms authentication page no css or images now display and if i try to login i get an error.
If I go to the login page which should recognise me from the AD I get 401 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials. You do not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials that you supplied.
[URL].....
First, a little background. I have written a custom HTTP compression module for ASP.NET. My development machine has Windows 7 Ultimate, which comes with IIS7. My production environment uses IIS6.
The problem I'm having is, Resource Expert Droid (redbot.org) tells me that I need to add a header to my response to properly support compression: "Vary: Accept-Encoding"
On IIS7 in integrated mode, it works properly. However, in classic mode, which is how my application ultimately runs, I cannot get my code to output this header using any of Response.AppendHeader(), Response.Cache.SetVaryByCustom(), or Response.Cache.VaryByHeaders.
What should 4.0 app pool be running under? Integrated or Classic?
My button click events don't seem to fire under Integrated when I'm on the root, but if I change to Classic they do fire
So SHOULD it be classic for 4?