I have been working with this database for some time. Here is the situation...
I inherited a MS SQL database that has hundreds of tables with similar data. For instance:
FordTampa_customer is a table,
ChevyAtlanta_customer is a table, etc....
All of the columns are the same...just different tables with their own ID field. All I have done...Inside of another database id is created a table called 'Customer' and added an 'Dealer ID' column along with the rest of the other columns in the other tables...
So the combination of the 'Dealer ID' and the 'ID' field are unique.....I know...its not the best way to do things...but I cannot change the old data structure because I cannot have access to it. I am give back-ups on a weekly basis, so this is all I have to work with.
All right, on to the real point of my post...
Currently, I have an application that I use to select all of the data from the 'Ford_customers','Chevy_customers',etc... and inserts them into my new main 'Customer' table. I do this by selecting the table names, bind it to an arraylist, loop through the list and execute an insert statement.
I do this in VB.NET, but I would prefer to do it in a Stored procedure of some kind....I just am not sure how to accomplish it. I use this syntax to get my list of tables:
[Code]....
I am not sure how to take those names from the table and do another select based on that list of names.
In an asp.net 3.5 web app, I have a page with the following markup/code (this is the brief version, but I believe I got all the relevant info).
[Code]....
The form contains 2 different record types, accessed using the paging controls, depending on the ParentSR field; a parent SR will be something like '1234' while its sub-record will be something like '1234.1'. There are only a few differences in the fields used between the 2 different record types and that is why they are stored in the same table. However, the activity depends on the record type. When browsing from the parent record to the sub-record, the itemtemplate loads fine (notice in the formview's datasource query, that the sractivity_id field is being pulled along with the subquery value). But when going to edit the record, the page throws an error:
System.Web.HttpUnhandledException: Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpUnhandledException' was thrown. ---> System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: 'ddlActivity' has a SelectedValue which is invalid because it does not exist in the list of items.
If i click 'back' and retry, it may take 3 attempts, but then the edittemplate will load just fine. I should also point out that this error does not always occur. I've been trying to figure this out for a couple months and it is driving me nuts, mainly due to the fact that I can't reproduce the error in development--it seems to only occurr in production. Anyone with any thoughts on what is going on?
I have a sproc that will insert a new record into Table1. Next I need to Insert into another table the scope_identity of the inserted record. How do I incorporate the scope_identity value as the insert parameter in the second insert statement?
I know the following sproc is vulnerable to SQL injection:
[Code]....
I would like to write a call to this sproc that uses SQL injection to execute the additional command:
[Code]....
That way, I can demonstrate the vulnerability of the sproc to SQL injection and test any revised implementations of the sproc using the same test call.
Problem is, SQL injection is harder than I thought! I just can't seem to do it.
Can anyone provide me with text for the sproc call to execute the additional command?
I am trying to update a records by calling a SPROC throgh my SQLDataAdapter.Here is my code in this order :
[Code]....
I have looked for parms which are field names with the @ in front but I can't seem to locate them in my code.I could use the assistance of a fresh pair of eyes.
Is there a good way to change the aspnet_Users, aspnet_Membership, aspnet_Applications and other table names which are generated by the ASPNET SQL Server registration tool -
[URL]
and change the reference to them in web.config or machine.config without breaking the default login, profiles and roles functionality that is provided by those tables?
I've got a script below that uploads multiple files and works fine. I am trying to rename them as I upload them and I'm having some trouble figuring it out.
I have DropDownList displays all server present in my network I want to populate the databse names when i changed it into another dropdown I want a LINQ query to get this.
I am writing an app that has a bit of process flow to it. On the save of a record, I need to check some fields to make sure they are not null. If they are not null, I will update a 'SectionComplete' field to true.
The thing is, I would like to store my fields in the web.config. So, I would like to have a string in the appsettings section that has a list of field names that are required. Then in my method, I would call these fields out and check each one for the specific record id, and then update the database.
I would like to do this in the web.config so we could add/remove columns without having to redeploy.
For example: my required fields are name, id, and phone. For section one to be labeled complete, all of these fields would need to be not null.
I have a mssql table of names. This table contains names from A thru Z. However, I want to be able to display names by their beginning alphabet...Like first Display names A thru CThen Display Names D thru F and ..so on....and so forth....thru ZI using asp.net and have a grid view with paging enabled.....
I am writting a custom class with which I manipulate the data for my website. I was wondering if there is a way to connect to a database and retreive the column names for a given table with out sellecting any data in the table.
Currently I am using an sql select and connection string to create an SqlComman object. Then I use the command object to create a SqlDataAdapter object which I use to fill a DataSet. At the end of all that I am able to retrieve the column names but I have select data and retreived data.
I have a grid view that I want to dynamically change based on data in my page. Specifically I want to change one of the title items and I want to hide a column based on a certain condition.
I am writing a plugin to help with a current ERP system we have that I am not allowed to modify the data structure at all. The table I am dealing with has over 100 columns and I am wanting to set my linq object propertychanged event and submitchanges or do I really have list out each property and set it equal to the new one?Below is an example of what I am trying to do:
Like that I have large number of controls on my form. I have dought, if I assigned like this, db.usp_ATI_FetchPatientDetails(iPatientID).ElementAt(0).Last_Name.ToString(); to every control, then I have set of controls like,
My question is that, for each control the Stored Procedure called or not? If it is yes then it is time consuming and I need to use LINQ to DataSet or LINQ to Object rather than to call SP for each control. What is difference between LINQ to DataSet and LINQ to Object?
I am trying to populate table column names into a dropdown list . how can I query using Linq to SQL to just get the list of few Column names ? in a method in DAL which I can use to load in my UI page !!
I have a aspx where i have thumbails of pictures in listview, once i click on a picture, picture shows up as big next to list view. Now what i want to do is, have a red color border around the thumbail of picture which is show big at the center. check the Picture I just want to change the CSS class of the image selected in the listview. I get to know which image id is selected through query string PageNO or if <%#Eval("PageNo") %> is =2 then second image css class should be redBorder else imgBorder1 ASPX Page
I have a simple web form with a dropdownlist and a ReportViewer. I would like to dynamically change the report within the viewer when the user makes a selection in the dropdownlist. I think I need to alter the ObjectDataSource that the ReportViewer is using. I've tried a few things without success.