ASP.NET
When TextBox1.Enabled = false; it has a gray background in FF3, but no change in IE8 or Chrome. So it's harder to tell if it's disabled or not. Is there any more general way to make the disable textbox rendered more consistent on a top-level? So I don't need to change this for every page or every website?
I have a bookingwith credit card page in my application and users will enter their crdit card details inside the textboxes. but after they enter them and post it the browser cache the data and after that in the same textbox, it can be autocomplated.
View 1 Repliesi m using one disabled textbox in my page .it is looking disabled in mozilla firefox but looking like a simple textbox in IE. what to do to give it a disabled look in IE also.
View 2 Repliesi need to let the user to enter numbers only in the textboxand the code should be work in IE FF and major browsers
View 5 Repliesn a page with textbox control, lets say this textbox is disabled on server side page load.What would happen if a javascript tries to set visibility of the textbox to false ?dit:Can the textbox be hidden by javascript even though it's disabled ?
View 1 RepliesI have a repeater which viewstate is disabled, inside i have a textbox and a submit button. Before disabling viewstate i could get the text from the textbox in the submit buttons onClick event. But now it doesnt seem to work.
I dont want to enable viewstate on the repeater as my site get really heavy then. How can I get the value form the textbox when I click the submit button? using .net 3.5
I have a textbox that I am defining as
<%= Html.TextBox("Username", Model.Form.Username,
new { @class = "textbox", @disabled = "disabled" })%>
In my action
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public ActionResult EditLogin(LoginForm post) {
return View(model);
}
post.Username will be blank, all other properties bind correctly, but if I change @disabled="disabled to @readonly="readonly" the username binds properly and everything works. It looks like model binding ignores values in disabled fields. Is their a way around this? I still need the field's value to bind to the model. I can use readonly but would prefer to use disabled so it is visually apparent to the user that they cannot edit the value of the field.
I have a multi-line textBox disabled through vb.net :
myTxtA.enabled= false
The html it outputs :
<textarea name="myTxtA" rows="10" id="myTxtA" disabled="disabled" style="width:99%;">...
why the value of disabled TextBox does not submited to server?i have text box to input date(year, day, month), and decide to inforce the user to insert date throgh datepicker jQuery control, so i have disabled the textbox, but the value does not submitted till i have remove the disable attribute(i dont want to lit the user to insert the date manually then i have to do exception handling to the wrong input.. i can not gess what he/she input)
View 2 Repliesif booking closed column values is equal or more than textbox1 text then the book button in gridview will be disabled for each gridview item whose booking closed time is greater and equal to textbox1 time ..
View 1 RepliesHowever I need to make a javascript function that on page load clears all textboxes. then when a single textbox is clicked all other textboxes are disabled until the user has finished and hit the "save button", then all textboxes are enabled again.
View 1 RepliesI have a couple of textboxes (actually a set of pairs of textboxes) where users can either enter a value or a percentage of a value but cannot use both. So in any given time some of these textboxes are disabled depending on which option the user chose.
For the textboxes representing percentages, there is a range validator to make sure only values from 0 to 100 are entered. If user selectes to enter datanot in percentage form, the percentage textbox gets filled automatically based on the value user enters. So if the total is something like 8 and user enters 2, the corresponding percentage textbox gets filled with 25% (minus the % sign).
However, the vaidation fails as if there is nothing there, persumably because the textbox is disabled. How do I get around this?
[code]...
I am trying to make ONE thing work. The form currently have TWO Textboxes and ONE CustomValidator(connected to the first textbox). I simply want once I enter less than 4 characters in the first Textbox and tab out to the second Textbox and if Javascript is DISABLED then the server side code should stop me. I can achieve what I am trying to do if I use a button but I need to do it in the fashion I am trying decribing because if I have for example 20 textboxes on the form I want the user to see after each data entry that his validation was successful or not. Here is a sample of my code.
[code]....
When we disabled the viewstate in gridview its lose value but this case not true with Textbox control why?
View 1 RepliesAfter witnessing some strange behvior I'm confused about ViewState again :/
My understanding was a textbox needed to have "EnableViewState" set to true otherwise when the you postback the fields contents would disappear.
That's not happening, I created a textbox and button and a label.
The button was set to copy contents of text box into the label when I pressed it.
I did and the text was populated into the label and remained in the textbox?
This was inside an UpdatePanel and the page itself has a MasterPage, so that might have something to do with it, but I have about 50 textboxes on this page all with viewstate=true on, so I would really like to know what controls need to have enableViewstate=true in order o function properly.
If a control is disabled (enabled = false), will the validator controls associated with it automatically know not to carry out validation?i have a checkbox and a textbox, if the checkbox is checked, the textbox is enabled, and has to have a value, where i used a required field validator.but if the checkbox is not checked, textbox is then disabled, however, the validator controls still seem to be trying to validate the disabled textbox.so is there a way to disable validator according to textbox's state? such as textbox.enable = true? seems like causevalidation method requires multiple button, owever i only need one...
View 7 RepliesI have 10 text box in a page like txt1,txt2...etc
In text box onchange i call the javascript function
for calculating txt5 value
i.e.
in javascript method,
txt5.value = parseFloat(txt1.value) + parseFloat(txt2.value) + parseFloat(txt3.value) + parseFloat(txt4.value);
and
text box txt5 enabled=false,autopostback is true
protected void txt5_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { // here based on txt5 value i getting records from database and doing some calculation and display those value in txt6,txt7
}
The problem is the textbox txt5 can;t post back when text change from JavaScript function.
How can I do postback when text box value bind from JavaScript function and enabled=false.
I have textbox in my page that I put this attribute for it TextMode="MultiLine"..here user can change width and hight of textbox with mouse..I couldn't find any attribute for textbox that din't allow users to change width and hight of textbox.
View 1 RepliesI have a field called WATER METER READING(Right now its a textbox to take 6 numbers) on my HTml page, but I need to change its format to display as [][][][][][] (6 separate small (single digit forms)).... all 6 fields required and all need to be a number. finally it should look like this.Water Meter Reading:* [][][][][][]
View 4 RepliesI have a view with a textbox in it and want to specify that the textbox is readonly and style='width:255px;' what i have is:
[Code]....
how do i do that in a one-liner? there is not CSS attribute for read-only in a text-area and after i do this textbox i will move on and want to do the same on the text-areas.
I am trying to set the style of an asp:TextBox in codebehind, the textbox is style is set initially to style="display:none" when I set the dispaly to block in codebehind the textbox appears for a moment and then it's gone. I don't know what this problem is, when it's done in javascript it works fine
Here is the code:
asp.net code:
<asp:TextBox ID="txtError" style="display:none" runat="server" ReadOnly="True" Width="95%"></asp:TextBox>
codebehind:
txtError.Style["display"] = "block";
I have a price field with some simple regex.
@"^(d*(.d{1,4})?)$"
It should allow positive numbers with an optional decimal, and 1-4 digits after.
So values like
2
22
2.2
2.222
.2
.56
0.64
If I use that regex with Regex.IsMatch, it works as I expect. However if use it as a RegularExpressionAttribute data annotation, It will not accept .2, as being valid. It will accept 0.2, and it will 2, 2.22, etc but it will not allow me to lead with a decimal place. I can hack around it by applying a javascript onkeydown event to add a 0 to front if you lead with a decimal.... Am I missing something here? Does the .net double type it backs into not support leading with .2 or is the jquery validation broken or what???
I am doing a md5 hash, and just want to make sure the result of:
md5.ComputeHash(bytePassword);
Is consistent regardless of the server?
e.g. windows 2003/2008 and 32/64 bit etc.
I have a textbox on my page for users to enter input. If they were to type text outside of the box, and then copy it into the textbox, how can I make the textbox able to preserve the style of the text copied into it: italics, bold-faced, etc.?
It currently will convert anything copied into it as plain text.
I have NHibernate sessions cached in the ASP.NET session.
I came across a situation where a user edited an object so it's in their first level cache in the ISession. Another user then edited the same object.
At this point User1 still sees their original version of their edits where as User2 sees the correct state of the object?
What is the correct way to handle this without manually calling session.Refresh(myObj) explicitly for every single object all the time?
I also have a 2nd level cache enabled. For NHibernate Long Session should I just disable the first level cache entirely?
Edit: Adding some more terminology to what I'm looking to achieve from 10.4.1. Long session with automatic versioning the end of this section concludes with
As the ISession is also the (mandatory) first-level cache and contains all loaded objects, we can propably use this strategy only for a few request/response cycles. This is indeed recommended, as the ISession will soon also have stale data.
I'm not sure what kind of documentation this is for it to include both probably and then immediately say the session will have stale data (which is what I'm seeing).